It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by US Monitor
Another poster who depends on hyperbole and rhetoric instead of actually looking at the facts.
I suggest you take a closer look at Africa and the ME.
Just an FYI, the ME has been a turbulent place since long before the US was ever conceived.
I notice you ignored my statement involving Darfur.
And you are comparing thieves in the US to the Pirates off Somalia?
Yeah that is the same......I guess you can say Zimbabwe is a peaceful place too right?
Wow. I mean just wow. Talk about revisionist history.
Lets tackle that assertion about the US putting Saddam in power.
So we used Afghans to kill Soviets?
Let me guess, the US told the USSR to invade Afghanistan as well right?
Why solar and wind power aren't the focal points for energy in these areas I don't understand.
Originally posted by DJMessiah
reply to post by US Monitor
Iraq, Afghanistan, Japan, Hawaii (prior to being forced to be a US state), Vietnam, Philippine Islands, Thailand (1962), Haiti, Spain, Honduras, Korea, Cambodia, Loas (Operation Commando Hunt).
Should I keep going?
So tell me, has placing a label on me helped your argument any?
I don't know how much of a closer "look" one can get, than actually visiting there, rather than reading about it on the news.
Everywhere in the world has been, but thanks to US and the UN helping to create the borders in the Middle East (not to mention in Africa as well), we can attribute much of the causes of wars there to this.
I didn't comment on Darfur, because Darfur is not seeking nuclear energy. Darfur is going through a food/water shortage, not a nuclear energy concern.
Both steal, do they not? Both are capable of murder, kidnapping, or blackmail. Only difference is that one group uses boats, the other can use cars.
Before or after the UN placed sanctions on it?
Lets do. So you're saying that the US didn't put Saddam in power? The CIA did not help kill off Qasim's party and its followers in 1963, and place Saddam's Ba'ath party in power? Is this not Rumsfield shaking hands with Saddam?
The CIA has no problem assassinating key political figures. Look up the "Phoenix Program" of Vietnam, just as an example.
Where did the Mujahadeen get its weapons, military training, and money from? Being from Afghanistan, I know its history very well.
Ever watch the movie Charlie Wilson's war? Though the movie is a Hollywood telling of what happened, it gets many of the key facts right.
Incorrect. I suppose one would say something like this to change the subject or try to put words in my mouth.
[edit on 28-4-2008 by DJMessiah]
Originally posted by DJMessiah
reply to post by US Monitor
Wikipedia is not a credible source, when anyone can edit it. Where did the name "United Nations" come from? So we weren't listed under the "Declaration by United Nations"?
The United Nations Charter was drawn up by the representatives of 50 countries at the United Nations Conference on International Organization, which met at San Francisco from 25 April to 26 June 1945. Those delegates deliberated on the basis of proposals worked out by the representatives of China, the Soviet Union, the United Kingdom and the United States at Dumbarton Oaks in August-October 1944. The Charter was signed on 26 June 1945 by the representatives of the 50 countries. Poland, which was not represented at the Conference, signed it later and became one of the original 51 Member States.
The United Nations officially came into existence on 24 October 1945, when the Charter had been ratified by China, France, the Soviet Union, the United Kingdom, the United States and by a majority of other signatories. United Nations Day is celebrated on 24 October each year.
The earliest concrete plan for the formation of a new world organization was begun under the aegis of the U.S. State Department late in 1939. The name United Nations was coined by President Franklin Delano Roosevelt in 1941 to describe the countries fighting against the Axis. It was first used officially on Jan. 1, 1942, when 26 states joined in the Declaration by the United Nations, pledging themselves to continue their joint war effort and not to make peace separately. The need for an international organization to replace the League of Nations was first stated officially on Oct. 30, 1943, in the Moscow Declaration, issued by China, Great Britain, the United States, and the USSR.
At the Dumbarton Oaks Conference (Aug.–Oct., 1944), those four countries drafted specific proposals for a charter for the new organization, and at the Yalta Conference (Feb., 1945) further agreement was reached. All the states that had ultimately adhered to the 1942 declaration and had declared war on Germany or Japan by Mar. 1, 1945, were called to the founding conference held in San Francisco (Apr. 25–June 26, 1945). Drafted at San Francisco, the UN charter was signed on June 26 and ratified by the required number of states on Oct. 24 (officially United Nations Day). The General Assembly first met in London on Jan. 10, 1946.
Originally posted by US Monitor
Provide some links that show the US is guilty of what you are trying to say.
Afghanistan is a legit war. They harbored the 9/11 terrorists.
On September 27, 2001 the FBI released photos of the 19 hijackers, along with information about many of their possible nationalities and aliases.[13] All the suspected hijackers were from Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, Lebanon or Egypt. wiki
Philippine's huh? Yeah sure ok....
But in the purchase, the United States also had received control over ancient Muslim sultanates still angry about the Spanish takeover centuries earlier. More urgently, it confronted a separate Catholic nationalist rebel movement, led by Emilio Aguinaldo. War soon erupted between the nationalists and the American troops stationed in the islands. The outgunned Filipinos adopted guerilla tactics; the U.S. army responded by rounding peasants into "reconcentration camps" and declaring entire areas battle zones, in which no distinctions were made between combatants and civilians. At least 4,200 American and 16,000 Filipino soldiers are thought to have been killed in the fighting. Historians have debated the scale of civilian deaths, with estimates ranging from 200,000 to almost 1 million. source
Spain? Yeah it was just last year that US troops left there right?
An act of Congress, passed in April 1898, just
prior to the U.S. declaration of war against Spain, explicitly declared Cuba to be
independent of Spain, demanded that Spain withdraw its military forces from the island,
and authorized the President to use U.S. military force to achieve these ends, if necessary.3
Spain rejected these demands, and an exchange of declarations of war by both countries
soon followed thereafter.4 .pdf source
Go on post some links, I look forward to reading them....
Originally posted by US Monitor
www.infoplease.com...
The earliest concrete plan for the formation of a new world organization was begun under the aegis of the U.S. State Department late in 1939. The name United Nations was coined by President Franklin Delano Roosevelt in 1941 to describe the countries fighting against the Axis. It was first used officially on Jan. 1, 1942, when 26 states joined in the Declaration by the United Nations, pledging themselves to continue their joint war effort and not to make peace separately.
Again, I don't see anywhere where it says that the US created the UN. Maybe you were confused because the US was ONE of MANY countries behind the creation of the UN.
Originally posted by US Monitor
I would love to hear what borders the US set in Africa. Next you will tell me they were US Colonies there too right? You do know that the UN is made up of more then just the US right? And that the US did not create the UN right?
So you are really going to use a picture of Rumsfeld with Saddam as the focus of your argument? I will stand by my link that actually explains things and doesn't leave it up to someone's imagination.
No, the US did not make the Soviets invade Afghanistan did they? But I am sure you will try to spin that into making it the fault of the US too.
I notice that you didn't provide any links to refute the links I posted. As for my wiki link, if what it said about the UN is false, then prove it wrong.
The earliest concrete plan for the formation of a new world organization was begun under the aegis of the U.S. State Department late in 1939. The name United Nations was coined by President Franklin Delano Roosevelt in 1941 to describe the countries fighting against the Axis. It was first used officially on Jan. 1, 1942, when 26 states joined in the Declaration by the United Nations, pledging themselves to continue their joint war effort and not to make peace separately. source
The terrorists were born in SA, where were they trained? Where were there camps located? That's right, Afghanistan.
The US is the dominant figurehead of the United Nations whether you want to admit to it or not. We go through the formality of bringing issues up for a vote to be approved by the whole, but we obviously have shown that we will go in unilaterally and accomplish our own ends. If the US was not the dominant player in the UN, do you really believe that everything would be allowed to go on as it does?
That has to be the most ridiculous thing I have read in quite a while. So you will not take the evidence of a photograph that clearly shows one of the top ranking US officials shaking hands with the person that we helped get into power? And you don't believe the CIA would do such a thing? I am absolutely speechless. Completely.
No, but we sure made a hell of a lot of money over it!
No one can show you reality except for yourself. As far as your UN link for wiki and the other links you provided. I still stand by my statement that you obviously either did not read what you sourced, or you simply did not understand it.
[edit on 4/28/08 by niteboy82]
Originally posted by US Monitor
I am amazed that a picture of Rumsfeld with Saddam means that the US put Saddam in power. Amazing leap there. Hey if I find a picture of FDR with Stalin does that mean I can say FDR and the US created the USSR? That we put them in power? Refute the link I posted and I will read it. But to use a picture and then create a story, not gonna fly.
But did we make the Soviets invade? And if the Soviets hadn't invaded would any money have ever gone to Afghanistan? NO.
Oh that's right, there weren't any terrorist camps in Afghanistan right? OBL wasn't there?
Again, the US did not create the UN by itself. Unless you are trying to tell me that. Are you?
Originally posted by US Monitor
I am amazed that a picture of Rumsfeld with Saddam means that the US put Saddam in power.
The picture of Donald Rumsfeld was taken in either 1983 or 1984 when he met as part of a presidential envoy with Saddam Hussein in which he let Hussein know that while the US was publicly protesting the use of chemical weapons in Iraq, America's goal of improving relations with Iraq was not going to be lessened in any way.
What do the Soviets invading Afghanistan have to do with our funding of the Mujahideen? You are taking the cause of a war, and using it to somehow negate the fact that the CIA helped support the group that would break off to become our modern day Al Qaeda.
If we knew were OBL was we would have either have caught him by now, or we would have let him be to help keep the American citizenry in fear of terror. I see it is obviously working for the latter ends, so I will take that one as the more probable story. I never said there were no camps in Afghanistan either, you are the one making up fallacious statements out of things that are not said and twisting them to fit your argument. Nice try.
I told you I wasn't explaining this anymore, and I'm not.
[edit on 4/28/08 by niteboy82]
Originally posted by US Monitor
reply to post by DJMessiah
Of course one big drawback to nuclear power is disposing of the waste. Something that isn't so very easy for any country.
Why solar and wind power aren't the focal points for energy in these areas I don't understand. I understand why they aren't in the west cause then Oil companies wouldn't make there money gouging us.