It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by johnsky
Bwahahahaha,
Thats the one constant with the Christian faith...
If you have a problem... blame someone else!
Don't try to solve the problem, just point the finger somewhere else, anywhere but at yourself.
I thought that the leader of this Christian religion might be able to hold himself above bigotry but... looks like he's just like the rest.
Pope Benedict XVI's Questionable Qualifications. If Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger's involvement with the Hitler Youth and his stonewalling of the pedophile priests' scandal aren't enough to disqualify him from becoming pope, what would?
By Bill Berkowitz
Pope Benedict XVI's Questionable Qualifications. If Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger's involvement with the Hitler Youth and his stonewalling of the pedophile priests' scandal aren't enough to disqualify him from becoming pope, what would?
Originally posted by Equinox99
reply to post by The Nighthawk
Well there is actually a difference between following the Pope, and following the bible. A true Christian follows the teachings of Christ. A Catholic follows the teachings that the Pope tells them to follow. Big difference.
I don't need a Gucci wearing "holy man" telling me how to believe in my faith.
Originally posted by Rockpuck
So why force the priest to be celibate?
Originally posted by dreamsnatcher
Why are the priests that molested children not going to jail?
BBC
Crimen solicitationis is indicative of a worldwide policy of absolute secrecy and control of all cases of sexual abuse by the clergy. You've got a written policy that says that the Vatican will control these situations and you also have I think clear written evidence of the fact that all they are concerned about is containing and controlling the problem.
Nowhere in any of these documents does it say anything about helping the victims.
The only thing it does is say that they can impose fear on the victims and punish the victims for discussing or disclosing what happened to them.
It's all controlled by the Vatican and at the top of the Vatican is the Pope so Joseph Ratzinger was in the middle of this for most of the years that Crimens was enforced he created the successor to Crimen and now he is the Pope this all says that the policy and systematic approach has not changed.
Cardinal Ratzinger, now as Pope, could tomorrow get up and say: 'Here's the policy: full disclosure to the civil authorities, absolute isolation and dismissal of any accused and proven and convicted clerics, complete openness and transparency, complete openness of all financial situations, stop all barriers to the legal process and completely co-operate with the civil authorities everywhere.'
Originally posted by dreamsnatcher
reply to post by Rockpuck
Thanks I don't really follow the on going saga it just seemed that no one was going to jail. It looked as if they just paid off the people and no one went to jail. Kinda like Michael Jackson. I didn't do anything but here is 20 million. The catholic church here in San Diego actually tried to go BK and not pay anyone.
Priest and the ordained are subject to Vatican Law and most countries try to allow that legal system to work before imposing its own local laws.
Many hold a dual citizenship in the Catholic 'national' structure - the Vatican, and the countries of their birth.
who often see an accused clergyman 'whisked' away and never heard from again - so they can't verify that any punitive actions were taken (that's why priests accused of pedophilia were often 'moved' to different parishes (far away mostly) after they did whatever Vatican Law told them to do for penance (be it retreat in prayer, or whatever they do for punishment).
our legal system often (not always) 'yields' to the church's traditional legal system
whereas the Catholic Church relies on Vatican Law which must, by its own precepts, have faith in the power of 'forgiveness'. The two approaches are obviously not very mutually compatible.
Originally posted by Comsence2075
Originally posted by Equinox99
reply to post by The Nighthawk
Well there is actually a difference between following the Pope, and following the bible. A true Christian follows the teachings of Christ. A Catholic follows the teachings that the Pope tells them to follow. Big difference.
I don't need a Gucci wearing "holy man" telling me how to believe in my faith.
Your constant Catholic bashing is unreal, and I really hope you don't call yourself a "Christian." If you do, it is sad to see a so called Christian bash ANY religion...Not very Christian like at all.
Not all Catholic's are bad, as pointed out many times in this thread about all the abusers outside of the Catholic religion. The problem is not religion, it is PEOPLE. People do bad things, bottom line. I myself would not blame it on society, but the people that did it.
How many stories do we see about politicians, cops, doctor's, high up people etc. doing bad things? It has nothing to do with religions. ANY group in society is going to have bad people....Welcome to life.
You can also bash the Pope as much as you like. Catholic's would not follow the Pople if he preached something that went against the Bible.
Your hatred is showing....You obviously know nothing about the Catholic religion and are generalizing all Catholic's. Let's not forget that the Catholic Church was the FIRST Christian religion.
All I know is as a Catholic, I don't talk down about anybodies religion...Even if you are not a Christian, the constant bashing of others faiths causes many problems in this world with your mentaility.
Originally posted by The Nighthawk
There's a whole separate sect that believes itself to be the "True" Catholic Church, with their own Pope, whose basis for belief is that the "Mainstream" Catholic Church has strayed too far from Scripture--especially after the Vatican II conference.
Originally posted by Rockpuck
reply to post by Maxmars
Priest and the ordained are subject to Vatican Law and most countries try to allow that legal system to work before imposing its own local laws.
Where the hell do people get this crap? Seriously? That is a blatantly false statement. Priest are conducted according to National, State, Local laws before "Vatican law" ..
Many hold a dual citizenship in the Catholic 'national' structure - the Vatican, and the countries of their birth.
Lol, wow, really letting your ignorance shine through huh?
To be a CITIZEN of the Vatican, one must be BORN IN THE VATICAN! You cannot Immigrate to the Vatican. You can live there, you can work there, but you are not a Citizen, you do not hold Duel Citizenship.
They where moved because the Church when they found out feared if the priest stayed there any longer then the community would eventually come forward and accuse the priest.
Aside from that, it is possible that in many cases the Church had no idea a priest was abusing some parishioners because in the Catholic Church, at least in America, priest are moved from parish to parish on average every 3 years..
Very rarely does a parish keep the same priest for to long.
our legal system often (not always) 'yields' to the church's traditional legal system
America, one of the most anti-Catholic populations "yields" to the Church? almost funny.
whereas the Catholic Church relies on Vatican Law which must, by its own precepts, have faith in the power of 'forgiveness'. The two approaches are obviously not very mutually compatible.
This has nothing to do with it.. the reasons the priest where covered up by the Church is that the Church knew exactly what would happen if people found out.. and the knew that American's have a tendency, when a wrong is done to them, to bring civil cases against institutions in the form of class action lawsuits.
The Church was trying to protect its reputation, protect its assets.
Doesn't make it right at all, it was greedy and immoral but it had nothing to do with what ever the hell your talking about..
Originally posted by Rockpuck
reply to post by Maxmars
Many hold a dual citizenship in the Catholic 'national' structure - the Vatican, and the countries of their birth.
Lol, wow, really letting your ignorance shine through huh?
To be a CITIZEN of the Vatican, one must be BORN IN THE VATICAN! You cannot Immigrate to the Vatican. You can live there, you can work there, but you are not a Citizen, you do not hold Duel Citizenship.
Originally posted by FlyersFan
The group you are referring to is the St. Pius X group.
Mel Gibson is one of them.
And no .... they did not break from the Catholic church because they believed that the Catholics had strayed too far from Scripture. They broke with the Catholic Church after Vatican II because of NOVUS ORDO. The New Order of the Mass. Novus Ordo is NOT the same mass as before Vatican II and there was a pronouncement by Pope Pius V that the Mass was never supposed to change. Pope Paul LIED and told the people that the NOVUS ORDO (which is now used) was the same mass as what had been in the Catholic Church since Pope Pius V.
It definately is NOT the same mass. The Pius X group is 100% correct. They very well could be the remnant true Catholic Church.
My husband and I have been looking into this for a few years. We sometimes go to their masses even though they are excommunicated. Their mass is the real mass. The real deal. However, they go over the top with too many other things (all the women wear hats or scarves .. etc).
Originally posted by sapphirearaidia
To go with that... the Pope just released 7 new deadly sins...
One is against the "OBSCENELY RICH"...
puz:
Originally posted by The Nighthawk
Catholics, for the most part, accepted the change. Pope Paul may indeed have lied but most don't seem to care.
Originally posted by FlyersFan
And as for those new so-called deadly sins... :shk: They are just left wing PC crap. It even looks like the cardinal is pushing some marxism as well.
Dumb.