OK, first to the mods. Hopefully this thread isn't deleted and I am sorry if it breaks the conduct rules (I did check them). It was not intended to be offensive to anyone

I have seen many members throw accusations at other members calling them government agents/disinfo agents/ trolls etc etc. My self being on the recieving end of a couple of these too

So here's a challenge to all the users throwing the accusations around. Why dont you name the members you think are trying to mislead the ATS population and why you think they are providing false info or covering up stuff? Lets keep it civil and mature though and let members have the option to defend themselves if necessary

Oh and feel free to add me to your list if you must

I dont believe this....44 views and not one person has named a disinformant

C'mon guys half of you out there do it, but are unwilling to name anyone. Does this mean that people are just accusing members that dont agree with them?

Although I agree with your challenage, I dont think anyone will answer because it is much easier to throw around the accusations when someone presents information to you, that you yourself can not dispute....then to try and proove to everyone why you think someone is a disinfo agent.

Its just like school kids. They get in a fight, one throws out some words (which are probably true) and the other says "well well well your just a big dummy and your mamma is fat!"

Fact is, nobody can proove it. It is impossible. It is just so easy to name call when you are sitting anonymously behind a screen name....and someone is trying to debate with you....and they say you are wrong.

I think if someone here feels the need to cry and call someone a 'disinfo agent"...they need to step up to the plate, be accountable for their accusations and lay before us exactly how this person is a disinfo agent. Until then, its just childish, insecure name calling.



(whew. i m really long winded tonight....and i have another drink...my excuse for my poor typing tonight)


[edit on 13-4-2008 by greeneyedleo]

Originally posted by greeneyedleo
I think if someone here feels the need to cry and call someone a 'disinfo agent"...they need to step up to the plate, be accountable for their accusations and lay before us exactly how this person is a disinfo agent. Until then, its just childish, insecure name calling.
(edit on 13-4-2008 by greeneyedleo]

Exactly

Thats why I asked them to show supporting evidence on why a member was a disinfo agent

So I take it that everyone posting in here is a disinfo agent.
Thanks for leting us know who you are.

The problem with disinfo agents is the problem that we have always faced with the agents of our immediate opposites - their power is only effective insofar as we trust them.

If we didn't trust them, then they would not be able to use their subversive methods of control to stop us from realising the truth.

Take a look at your nearest net-buddy, and ask yourself; "What do i really know about this character?"

*takes the biscuit*

Originally posted by Creo Coactum
So I take it that everyone posting in here is a disinfo agent.
Thanks for leting us know who you are.

If you are accusing us....please give a reason why you think we are disnfo agents

Okay, i'm sorry - i'm purposefully spreading the seeds of paranoia here aren't i?

*puts the biscuits away*

edit; with all that said, i do infact sincerely doubt that the powers that be are acting that subversively - after all, i don't have any evidence.

[edit on 13-4-2008 by Anti-Tyrant]