Disinformationists....where?, page 1


Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 12 times


reply posted on 12-4-2008 @ 10:45 PM by dizziedame
reply to post by OzWeatherman


Thank you for addressing this subject. The insistence by some members that there are government disinformation agents posting on ATS has bothered me since I have been enjoying my time reading threads here.

I find it difficult to believe there are disinformation agents posting in ATS forums.

Having had to have federally mandated certifications for several jobs I have done over the years it has become apparent that, believe it or not, the federal budget is tight. I've been in classrooms with a projection room but no equipment. It was common for instructors to not have necessary items to use in the classes and was always given the same explanation as to why the lack of what was needed......not enough money.

Yes, we are spending gross amounts of our tax dollars for our military, government salaries and excessively priced services for our government.
But it is a pick and choose game and it seems unreasonable for the PTB to pay agents to infiltrate internet sites.

Are we that important to the alphabet organizations? I doubt it.


reply posted on 12-4-2008 @ 11:16 PM by OzWeatherman
reply to post by dizziedame



I completely agree with you.

It is absurd to think that the government would waste time, money and resources on presenting false inofrmation on ATS.

Its just that people dont like being proven wrong and in some cases dont even like being challenged. Interesting to see that nobody has yet named anyone



reply posted on 13-4-2008 @ 02:14 AM by SantaClaus
reply to post by OzWeatherman



You beat me to this post. I was thinking about this and didn't quite know how to word it. If I were to think about it, I'd automatically discount all posts from a person who ever cried disinformant.

Its a silly theory with possibilities if this were more than a forum. But to the gov, we are just a bunch of looney tunes anyway. They don't care about us. If they were smart, they'd have disinformants, I don't give them that much credit.

Starred and flagged.


reply posted on 13-4-2008 @ 02:54 AM by greeneyedleo
reply to post by Anti-Tyrant




Take a look at your nearest net-buddy, and ask yourself; "What do i really know about this character?"

*takes the biscuit*



Hey some "net buddies" know quite a lot about each other

They just dont share it all out in the open.

*hands you another biscuit*





[edit on 13-4-2008 by greeneyedleo]


reply posted on 13-4-2008 @ 02:59 AM by Creo Coactum


I wonder how much this ad cost in 50`s for disinfo? Which by the way fails to mention radio active fall out.



reply posted on 13-4-2008 @ 03:00 AM by Anti-Tyrant
reply to post by greeneyedleo



*takes the biscuit*

Yep, i acknowledge the truth of that.

Don't you think that if there was indeed a disinfo agenda they would have thought of the fact that many people actually collaborate in person as well as on the internet though?

Just because He seems like a good chap, and for all intents and purposes he is one, doesn't mean that he can't pop to the bathroom and upload the recorded conversations from his (or her) phone to a private databse.

Ah, the mobile phone - Spykit of the future.

*opens his own pack of biscuits and offers to share*

[edit on 13-4-2008 by Anti-Tyrant]


reply posted on 13-4-2008 @ 03:09 AM by OzWeatherman
reply to post by Creo Coactum




Please stop posting youtube links and explain why you think all of us are disinfo agents. You havent explained anything

Maybe your just one of those people that posts useless unrelated BS


reply posted on 13-4-2008 @ 03:13 AM by Anti-Tyrant
reply to post by OzWeatherman



I say, that's a little harsh, is it not?

*plays devil's advocate*

He is after all only providing information from sources that are in the public domain, you can't be suspicious of a guy for doing something like that.

[insert moral superiority facet here - "Innocent until PROVEN Guilty"]


reply posted on 13-4-2008 @ 03:20 AM by OzWeatherman
Originally posted by Anti-Tyrant
reply to
post by OzWeatherman



I say, that's a little harsh, is it not?

*plays devil's advocate*

He is after all only providing information from sources that are in the public domain, you can't be suspicious of a guy for doing something like that.

[insert moral superiority facet here - "Innocent until PROVEN Guilty"]


All right smarty pants...lol

He is avoiding my question thats all...I just want a straight answer

Care for a biscuit?
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



Are You Offended??? SO WHAT!!!
  Posted 9 days ago with 97 member flags
The Image of Baphomet: Upsetting Folks Since 1855.
  Posted 9 days ago with 39 member flags
New Scientific Report Destroys Global Warming!
  Posted 7 days ago with 32 member flags
Al Azif: Is The Necronomicon Real?
  Posted 8 days ago with 25 member flags
What The Hell Is This?
  Posted 5 days ago with 9 member flags
How copyright enforcement robots killed the Hugo Awards
  Posted 7 days ago with 4 member flags