Originally posted by Swingarm
An easy method for evaluating suspect information is noticing in what context a falsehood exists once you find one.

Nah, it's easier than that - based on posts in this thread it's quite obvious that the way you find a disinformationist is simply to look for anyone posting something which disproves your unsubstantiated conspiracy theory. And if the person concerned actually knows what they're talking about then it's a clincher ...

So, if someone claims that HAARP used chemtrails to sink Atlantis based on a dream their unidentified friend's neighbour's cousin had last week then you know that person is clearly telling the truth and anyone disputing the claim works for the CIA

since this is my opinion and cannot be proven or dis-proven.

my list would be

whattheory
deltaboy
oz
essan
andrewEwiggin

you gents seem to debunk ANYTHING that comes your way,,
do any of you think 911 was an inside job??
do any of you think there is a N.W.O??
do any of you think that the war on terror is a LIE???

Originally posted by Maya432
since this is my opinion and cannot be proven or dis-proven.

my list would be

whattheory
deltaboy
oz
essan
andrewEwiggin

you gents seem to debunk ANYTHING that comes your way,,
do any of you think 911 was an inside job??
do any of you think there is a N.W.O??
do any of you think that the war on terror is a LIE???

Thankyou for an intelligent post, which is more than some members have posted on here (ie. you gave a reason)

To answer those 3 questions

911- no
N.W.O- no
War on Terror- extremely likely

I have been battelling with this question myself. I am in the military (I know that automatically makes me part of the evil big brother lol) I have worked for the government for many years, I even have a very close relative in the FBI. I have gone to multipile federal training seminars, and have been to a multitude of military bases (even the infamous wright-patterson AFB, and Nellis AFB {the alleged area 51}) and not once in my years of government training have I met one single "disinfo agent" or even a propagandist for that matter. There is however an MOS in the USA called psychological warfare specialist, but these guys have far more pressing issues to address. Believe it or not guys not everyone in the government recieves special "propaganda training" to brianwash the American public, the media does that just fine by itself.

in a related post here, I embrace Mr. Oz. Its nice to see an actual scientific basis once in awhile. Its always more reliable to attempt to debunk claims and myths. That way if we cannot provide enough information to the debunking we are obviously left with something paranormal. Everyone on this website always claims to be "seeking the truth" yet most of the garbage being spewed from some of these people's mouths are just appauling. They make claims they can't back up, they are talking about things that they really have no comprehension of, and their so called evidence comes from just an unreliable source as they are, or they take half the story and twist it to fit thier agenda, thats not science thats propaganda folks.

Originally posted by Maya432
since this is my opinion and cannot be proven or dis-proven.

my list would be

whattheory
deltaboy
oz
essan
andrewEwiggin

you gents seem to debunk ANYTHING that comes your way,,
do any of you think 911 was an inside job??
do any of you think there is a N.W.O??
do any of you think that the war on terror is a LIE???

1. No. But that doesn't mean there isn't a cover up. We haven't been told everything. And no-one (IMO) expected the towers to collapse.

2. No. Although if a NWO does it exist it's possibly the most incompetent organisation in human history.

3. Not as such, but at the same time, I don't believe anything politicians or the media tell us.

Originally posted by jdr92487
in a related post here, I embrace Mr. Oz. Its nice to see an actual scientific basis once in awhile. Its always more reliable to attempt to debunk claims and myths.

Thankyou, finally some appreciation

Everyone on this website always claims to be "seeking the truth" yet most of the garbage being spewed from some of these people's mouths are just appauling. They make claims they can't back up, they are talking about things that they really have no comprehension of, and their so called evidence comes from just an unreliable source as they are, or they take half the story and twist it to fit thier agenda, thats not science thats propaganda folks.

I totally agree.

This is the reason why they turn to making chilidsh disinformation accusations. They cant debunk the debunkers so they make a personal attack on them and/ or their credentials

Whether "debunkers", "conspiracy theorists" or people totally disinterested in conspiracy stuff, most people are prejudiced and even mentally incapable of thinking beyond the prejudices of their environment. With regards to this issue, those accused of being "disinformationists" are probably as guilty of such prejudice as those who make the accusations....

Although it is entirely possible that there truely are disinformationists out here.... I just wouldn't put them solely in the "debunkers" corner

I agree. The govt. budget is very tight. I spent some time working for uncle sam, although I wasn't very high on the totem pole to gain all knowledge and operations which goes on behind locked doors. I do know that we used certain disinformation tactics against certain terrorist organizations. But most of this come as fake radio/t.v. broadcasts AND by infiltrating certain news sites with terrorists connections. But most of this was done by mil intelligence and maybe two other govt agencies, while some of these operations was given (much to the dislike of the NSA) to civilian owned broadcasting networks, and they where paid very well. But not to my knowledge has the govt. ever wasted the money nor time to imbed 'dis-info agents' on american 'conspiracy therorists' sites. In fact, the government likes the conspiracy theories, it keeps people focused on what could be further from the truth. But I don't know every thing, just know the govt. is cheap, very cheap. Why do you think they've gone to using so many contractors, they are 'cheap labor and expendable.