I'd like to point out what I've come to believe.
Anyone who watches the several good quality videos of WTC7 falling (oopsies, gov't) with a mind so open as to accept the fact that everything you
know is a lie... and even those who just see things for what they are.... can see that WTC7 was deliberately taken down. There's no question in my
mind about that. If you look at the collapse of the twin towers and you see where some of the debris did indeed hit the WTC7 building, and then you
compare it with the course of the collapse later on.... it just doesn't match up. Why would the building fall straight down, if the debris from the
towers only damaged a portion of one face of the building?
However... the question of explosives weighs heavily on my mind. Was it the use of explosives alone that brought the building down? I think lately
that there just wasn't enough signs of a controlled demolition using conventional high explosives. The simple fact is that explosions are loud and
are visible from the outside of the building.
C4.... there's no way c4 could've been used without it being obvious to everyone.
Thermite, possibly? That's what I've been hearing, but even that gives of massive amounts of heat and sparks, and it takes a few seconds to
completely burn through even a lightweight car frame. We're talking heavy duty steel colums here.
Sometimes, the most extraordinary angle is the one to look at.
Lately, I've been seriously considering the DEW theory.
look at this webpage here:
Manfred Zysk: Star Wars Defense Initiative
I also realized that these space based laser satellite systems could also be used directly as weapons to destroy military facilities and major
operations centers on the Earth’s surface, and automatic laser beam adjustments would be made to compensate for any atmospheric diffusion of the
laser beam. It seemed that laser beams of 4-inch thickness were possible.
These weapons exist. If you read the rest of that page, you'll realize that Manfred knew about this in the Early 60's. What do you think they have
now?
If one building was destroyed with directe3d energy weapons, then ALL of them were destroyed with directed energy weapons.
It is possible that it was a combination of exotic incendiary devices AND DEW... but I'm not so sure I'd bet my money on incendiary devices alone to
do the job to perfection. There's too much room for error, and we're talking about furthering an agenda that has been in planning for 40 or so
years. If that didn't go according to plan, the factions within the government would have been exposed. All the dirty laundry and the 60 odd years of
lies, secrecy, and hidden agendas within the alphabet agencies would have been spilled out onto the street. Billions and billions of dollars in
laundered civilian tax money would have been brought to light... and you might as well have started the Second Civil War on that day....
but almost everything seems to have gone directly according to plan... and I still can't explain how they did it so well.
All I know is just look at the videos of the buildings falling, watch them over and over and over, and you KNOW there's just no way it could've
fallen like that. The human mind... don't underestimate it's inherent ability be able to understand the physics of motion (just think of how well
some people can shoot baskets. You don't need to be a physicist to make the perfect shot.).
Anyway... I'm almost reluctantly starting to look at some of the information John Lear has presented about the destruction of WTC7 and the twin
towers.
If you seriously think about it, he can't be too far off base... at least about the DEWs. These are space based energy weapons that leave no trace
and no physical evidence at the scene of the crime. What a perfect backup plan, at least.
