It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

WTC 7 Serious Proof of Controlled Demoltions

page: 1
14
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 7 2008 @ 06:17 PM
link   
No one has been able to prove that WTC 7 came down with anything but controlled demoltions.



How does a 47 story building collapse without destroying building feet away?



No doubt about it, World trade center 7 was brought down by controlled demolitions.



[edit on 7-4-2008 by IvanZana]

[edit on 7-4-2008 by IvanZana]




posted on Apr, 7 2008 @ 06:22 PM
link   












posted on Apr, 7 2008 @ 06:23 PM
link   
I'm sorry but you are not telling any one any thing new in your post You have to be blind if you don't think wt7 and the towers were controlled demoltions



posted on Apr, 7 2008 @ 06:25 PM
link   

Originally posted by duffster
I'm sorry but you are not telling any one any thing new in your post You have to be blind if you don't think wt7 and the towers were controlled demoltions



Or a government sponsored terrorist, hired to obsufecate the truth on 911 forums.



posted on Apr, 7 2008 @ 06:28 PM
link   
Here is what the newly rebuilt WTC 7 "Solomon brothers" building looks like,


As you can see how close the other building are and how little damage they suffered.

[edit on 7-4-2008 by IvanZana]



posted on Apr, 7 2008 @ 07:04 PM
link   
I love hearing all the "Tabloid" type of theories and Alice in wonder land logic in attempts to desperatly burry or confuse threads such as this one.


The official story is OFFICIALLY DESTROYED... spread the word

[edit on 7-4-2008 by IvanZana]



posted on Apr, 7 2008 @ 07:13 PM
link   
911 is a disgrace...anyone that wants to know what really happened just has to look on the internet..
..tghe people behind this are the people that gain from it..the bigger crime is that the real killers are free..many groups of people did there parts to make that day a complete sucess..compartmentalize...the company "Controlled Demolition"which did the clean up at both Okla and WTC,,,these are generation after generation demolition experts..I hears one of the wives working there that her family is as tight as the Mafia..They own big property out west..I keep thinking that there Mafia tight family (Best Demo experts)..are behind the actual placements of various differnt bombs,,example,.a thermate wraper around an importan beam..hundreds are attaced on the baring loads,..
..a 47 story is big..it is big to wire ..basement foundation beams of tremendous strenth they must be broken apart first so the basement can filled wth all the above stuff..47 story tall..the Mafia..never told the family secrets.,,..capesh ?...911may have been ,..



posted on Apr, 7 2008 @ 07:13 PM
link   
911 is a disgrace...anyone that wants to know what really happened just has to look on the internet..
..tghe people behind this are the people that gain from it..the bigger crime is that the real killers are free..many groups of people did there parts to make that day a complete sucess..compartmentalize...the company "Controlled Demolition"which did the clean up at both Okla and WTC,,,these are generation after generation demolition experts..I hears one of the wives working there that her family is as tight as the Mafia..They own big property out west..I keep thinking that there Mafia tight family (Best Demo experts)..are behind the actual placements of various differnt bombs,,example,.a thermate wraper around an importan beam..hundreds are attaced on the baring loads,..
..a 47 story is big..it is big to wire ..basement foundation beams of tremendous strenth they must be broken apart first so the basement can filled wth all the above stuff..47 story tall..the Mafia..never told the family secrets.,,..capesh ?...911may have been ,..



posted on Apr, 7 2008 @ 07:30 PM
link   
building #7 ...It have investications beibg stored there..the CIA had important material..held for investagations..Law offfices...full of importan cases...The IRS had a floor there..On going investigations m,..some of then most importian When that building,..that had only had sporatic firers...coming out oF some widows were small black...indicating that tthese fires in there were burnimg office furnitur and stuff..nothing really hot for making steel fale...and ALL fail at once..the governemt is a disgrace to make uis have to beleive our lying eyes...



posted on Apr, 7 2008 @ 07:38 PM
link   
What I can not understand is why no one on either side of congress says a word. You would think that the dems would find evidence to bring the republicans to there knees. Does this mean our intire government is involved. I just wish someone would explain this to me, because I to beleave that explosives had to be involved!



posted on Apr, 7 2008 @ 08:53 PM
link   

Originally posted by IvanZana
Here is what the newly rebuilt WTC 7 "Solomon brothers" building looks like,

As you can see how close the other building are and how little damage they suffered.

[edit on 7-4-2008 by IvanZana]




It looks like WTC7 got hit the most. And the other buildings in your photo were repaired.
All that is missing for the OP to be correct is evidence.

[edit on 7-4-2008 by beachnut]



posted on Apr, 7 2008 @ 08:59 PM
link   
Could someone please list the physical evidence of a CD please?

And can someone list some examples of other 47 story buildings that have been demolished so we can compare?

So far the only argument I see is that it simply looks like one. That of course is not a valid argument. I would like to see the physical evidence.



posted on Apr, 7 2008 @ 09:05 PM
link   
reply to post by snoopy
 


How many skyscrapers do you know come down with an announcement before collapse?



posted on Apr, 7 2008 @ 09:11 PM
link   

Originally posted by talisman
reply to post by snoopy
 


How many skyscrapers do you know come down with an announcement before collapse?



How many skyscrapers have been hit by tons of falling debris from collapsing buildings? Are you saying that a rare event doesn't justify a rare result? This is not a valid argument. I asked for proof, not conjecture. Can you prove that it was a CD?

By your logic, if something doesn't happen for the first time, then it's not possible. And therefore all existence is not possible. Was the first building fire impossible because before that no building had ever burned?

Or perhaps you can show us some examples of other buildings that were of the same design and suffered the same damage and still survived? Because even if you did, it still would not prove a controlled demolition.

And more importantly the announcement of the collapse was by the firefighters who could clearly see that the building was in danger of collapse due to fire. Understandable considering the building had been burning all day long with no aid or water. All firefighters know that buildings under such conditions are destined to collapse. Common sense. The firefighters there at the scene when it was happening even went so far as to discuss this on camera.



posted on Apr, 7 2008 @ 09:12 PM
link   
reply to post by beachnut
 


The problem with blaming *all* of the damage of building 7 on the collapse of the Towers, is that the South Tower collapsed right next to the North Tower and ejected its incredibly heavy steel right into the North Tower.

Yet, I don't see consistent damage to the North Tower from the South Tower~! Where are the gaping holes from this? We hear of some damage.
See my thread here as to not to go off topic here
www.abovetopsecret.com...

Building 7 came done in way that even convinced a demolitions expert. It kept its shape while falling and had the "prophetic" announcement of its demise made by the BBC and EMP who said "THE BUILDING IS ABOUT TO BLOW UP".

Coming down looking like a controlled demolition is one thing, but to have people predicting the UNLIKELY collapse is entirely another!



posted on Apr, 7 2008 @ 09:15 PM
link   
reply to post by snoopy
 


You point out all this damage that was done to building 7 by a random event. This *RANDOM* ejection caused what looked like a demolition. In other words, the planning that goes into controlled demolitions would never have to be used. Just blindly hit a building with enough material and start fires, according to this logic that your using, this would be sufficient for a controlled collapse! Not to mention people predicting the collapse.


[edit on 7-4-2008 by talisman]



posted on Apr, 7 2008 @ 09:17 PM
link   

Originally posted by snoopy
All firefighters know that buildings under such conditions are destined to collapse. Common sense. The firefighters there at the scene when it was happening even went so far as to discuss this on camera.


Can you back this up with precedence? Destined to collapse huh? Why do we even need Controlled Demolitions, Inc. then? You've just taken them out of business. You should start your own multimillion dollar company. Think of how much money you'd save compared to CDI. All you need is a crane with demolition ball, some kerosene and you're all set.

Yeah right.



posted on Apr, 7 2008 @ 09:17 PM
link   
reply to post by IvanZana
 

And this is the exact reason I became a "9/11 truther"!!!



posted on Apr, 7 2008 @ 09:22 PM
link   

Originally posted by Griff

Originally posted by snoopy
All firefighters know that buildings under such conditions are destined to collapse. Common sense. The firefighters there at the scene when it was happening even went so far as to discuss this on camera.


Can you back this up with precedence? Destined to collapse huh? Why do we even need Controlled Demolitions, Inc. then? You've just taken them out of business. You should start your own multimillion dollar company. Think of how much money you'd save compared to CDI. All you need is a crane with demolition ball, some kerosene and you're all set.

Yeah right.


Have you not seen the footage of the firefighters there as it was happening talking about it? I don't know how to search youtube for it, but I have seen it posted on this forum. They are pointing at WTC 7, talking about the fires, and saying that it's definitely going to come down. And that's why they decided to pull the firefighting effort. They all knew they couldn't save the building and they had already lost too many men. It wasn't worth it for a building they couldn't save. And countless firefighters form that day have talked about this in interviews. To them it's no contest.

Why do we need demolition companies? Because burning buildings all day long is not a reliable way to collapse a building. The whole point is to keep it controlled so it's safe and there is no damage to surrounding areas. While it may look nice and controlled from a low res small video clip on the internet, it was anything but that and a lot of surrounding buildings later had to be demolished form the damage caused by the collapse.

And again, could you point out a controlled demolition of a 47 story building?

And how about any demolition done using Thermite?

how about any physical evidence what so ever that shows WTC 7 was brought down with explosives?



posted on Apr, 7 2008 @ 09:33 PM
link   
Ok, I agree with your lovely demonstration about Building No 7 asa Silversteins Building that dropped like a pancake. My real question is......Where was Cheney when all this was going on, because it is a fact that on that fatal day of 9/11, dicky cheney was conducting some kind of plane games with norad, what a co-incidence. Will the authorities ever call up cheney and put him on the lie tester to see if he is sane or insane. Truly it's a national disgrace that the Government Agencies conspired to do all this, under the name of National Security. We have definately reached the depts of the Pits.



new topics

top topics



 
14
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join