Who decides who lives and who dies? Why.. the mighty do of course. History would allow no other alternative.
The strong will do what they can, the weak will suffer what they must.
Depopulation sounds bad, poor starving babies and the likes.. but the fastest growing populations are those that are artificially kept affloat.
Indonesia for instance cannot produce enough food to support its population. It imports large amount of food.. the reason rice is so expensive and so
many countries stopped sales of rice is because Indonesia put in a massive back order to feed her own people.. trying to stock up cheap because they
saw in the future a few months down the road they where #.
So why should we fly food from America and other nations that produce large abundances of food and send it to Africa, Asia or South America? .. If we
do.. we let the population expand. When that happens it takes more resources, and the population expands. Because the people are ignorant and all
they can do is make babies.. we have a perpetual cycle.
Remove artificial feeding and allow nature to regulate the amount of souls in one location depending on the population and what the Earth can sustain.
People will die. Boohoo. People die anyways, kids born to starving mothers to wither away, die, then their ignorant mother has 2 more kids and maybe
they survive to have 6 kids by 20 years old and have half die.
If they all died to begin with, there would actually be less death because they wouldn't be starving to give birth to starving babies who would give
birth to even more starving babies.
All because they cannot sustain themselves.
The longer its held off the bigger the chaos in the end.. if the famines pass this year, 20 years from now the famine will take 50X the resources had
we allowed nature to take her place in the world and regulate the eco system.
HUMANITY IS APART OF THE ECO SYSTEM. And artificially allowing Human growth to expand unchecked is a violation.
You say, who says who lives and dies. The strong do. Always has it been that way. you say why does Rockefeller or Kissinger have any more of a
right to live? they don't. But they have the resources, they control the resources. I wouldn't die. Hell I'd shoot someone and munch on their
leg before that happened. I'm sick SOB, but hey, I'd survive the rest.
Humanity is not God. Humanity is a mockery of God. We think we are God when in fact we truly ignorant. We will defeat disease, and Humans will
decay longer and experience longer lives until the ripe old age of 100 where they will continue to use resources and # their pants while consuming,
consuming, consuming. We may end wars, have peace, and grow as a worldly population perpetually with no end in sight. And we may conquer natural
disasters by fleeing the area, then using vast resources to rebuild in the same location just to repeat the process in another four years. We may end
hunger by flying genetically engineered food all over the world and assist in the growth of third world countries until the population exceeds are
rational. And we may keep people around forever. Shoot, we may just find the cure for death and become immortal in our own way and just reproduce
But in the end a new virus will kill us all. Over population will excite wars and death will mount in the millions. A drought will kill the crops, a
flood will wash away farm land, and millions upon millions will die. The rain will be acid from the manufacturing and the animals will die because
they ate genetically altered plants. We won't escape our world.. the Human fear of death and the Human fear of seeing death will ultimately lead to
If that makes sense.
I don't mean to sound like an ass. But there are to many people in the world. We need to stop finding ways to keep people alive, to cure disease
and to end wars, famine, natural disasters. We need a return to the status quo.
In my opinion, be it dark, morbid and twisted that it is.