It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by sir_chancealot
Ok, I'll buy that ***IF*** you can give me a plausible explanation for this one.
Andrews Air Force Base is 16 miles BY CAR from the Pentagon. It is tasked with defending Washington DC in the event of attack. That is an INDISPUTABLE FACT.
How did a guy in a cave in Afghanistan get Andrews Air Force Base to stand down, and not launch fighter jets after the second tower was struck?
Originally posted by seasalt
Originally posted by sir_chancealot
Ok, I'll buy that ***IF*** you can give me a plausible explanation for this one.
Andrews Air Force Base is 16 miles BY CAR from the Pentagon. It is tasked with defending Washington DC in the event of attack. That is an INDISPUTABLE FACT.
How did a guy in a cave in Afghanistan get Andrews Air Force Base to stand down, and not launch fighter jets after the second tower was struck?
Dear Friend
kind regards
Andrews Air Force Base is 16 miles away.
You are correct.
What does that have to do with 9/11 and my theory?
I assume you are refering to Osama, when you ask me how a guy in a cave gets Andrews Air Force Base to stand down, and not launch fighter jets after the second tower was struck?
He didn't.
He was in Afghanistan.
The 19 hijackers assigned to that task did the job.
Osama was a key mastermind.
Yours thankfully
John
yes i think you are the only one left becuase there is a lot of proof the government did it eg certain people some how made profits from the 9/11 disaster and on the same day 11 years before 9/11 in 1990 bush Sr talked about NWO
I believe the point is............. why if the base is so close, and if they were doing their jobs did they allow a plane to even approach the pentagon. P.S. if you say the hijackers turned off the transponder.... its called radar
Hi John, Sorry I can't in good conscience go along with your theory, there are too many questions that need answering before I'll concede to the governments and your theory. As a previous poster wanted to know, and yes I do too, is how no fighter jets were launched to defend the DC area, when it was known that wayward passenger aircraft were heading to Washington, how could this happen? even if the situation was very, very confusing, wouldn't fighters be launched? I think so, and if not, everyone in charge should have been fired, not promoted. As for Alex Jones, George Noory, and those at loose change, I assure you, they have not made a penny from me, so for you to even throw that out there, is presumptuous at best. I'll wait for that retraction, And if those responding after me........... Could you let us know if you have paid for information from those mentioned?
Originally posted by sir_chancealot
Originally posted by seasalt
Originally posted by sir_chancealot
Ok, I'll buy that ***IF*** you can give me a plausible explanation for this one.
Andrews Air Force Base is 16 miles BY CAR from the Pentagon. It is tasked with defending Washington DC in the event of attack. That is an INDISPUTABLE FACT.
How did a guy in a cave in Afghanistan get Andrews Air Force Base to stand down, and not launch fighter jets after the second tower was struck?
Dear Friend
kind regards
Andrews Air Force Base is 16 miles away.
You are correct.
What does that have to do with 9/11 and my theory?
I assume you are refering to Osama, when you ask me how a guy in a cave gets Andrews Air Force Base to stand down, and not launch fighter jets after the second tower was struck?
He didn't.
He was in Afghanistan.
The 19 hijackers assigned to that task did the job.
Osama was a key mastermind.
Yours thankfully
John
Ok, for the sake of debate, I'll buy that "19 hijackers assigned to that task did the job".
My question now becomes: How did 19 hijackers get the air force based tasked with defending Washington DC to stand down, and not intercept whatever it was that hit the Pentagon?
*HOW* did two of the worlds tallest buildings disintegrate into piles of dust after burning fuel took out the top level of one of the towers and a bit further down on the other. Weren't these towers supposedly built to prevent collapse in case of collision? Why did the pancake?
*HOW* did some of the supposed hijackers turn up alive in the middle east complaining about identity theft?
*WHY* did firemen in the trade centres hear MULTIPLE explosions, from all up both buildings, minutes after the initial impact? What exactly was blowing out the structural reinforcements?
*HOW* did a plane leave an 18 foot hole in the pentagon and also disintegrate, leaving little or no wreckage?
*WHAT* DNA evidence has the FBI got of the alleged hijackers? Why hasn't this been brought out into the public forum, to appease the truth seekers (sorry conspiracist loonies).
*WAS* NORAD aware of the four hijacked planes veering off course even before being reported by the FAA? If not, please explain why NORAD which monitors 7000 flights a day, was unable to track the four aberrant flights. I would love to hear your answers in good faith. If you plough through these I will happily direct you to a link (below) with lots and lots of questions still unanswered?
Originally posted by saturnsrings
reply to post by seasalt
Hi again John,
Everyone here is aware that drills were going on on 9/11, but since when do our armed forces advertise their drill intentions?
I sure can't, for the life of me, remember, the air force advertising, drills that day. Perhaps you can provide proof that these drills were indeed, made public before 9/11. Perhaps, years before, because the planning had to be done over a period of years, according to experts anyway.
I don't believe coincidences are all that common, sure, I will concede they do happen, but and this is a BIG but, that many coincidences on THAT day, are just too many to be happenstance.
Now this conjunction of an immense military establishment and a large arms industry is new in the American experience. The total influence -- economic, political, even spiritual -- is felt in every city, every Statehouse, every office of the Federal government. We recognize the imperative need for this development. Yet, we must not fail to comprehend its grave implications. Our toil, resources, and livelihood are all involved. So is the very structure of our society.
In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist. We must never let the weight of this combination endanger our liberties or democratic processes. We should take nothing for granted. Only an alert and knowledgeable citizenry can compel the proper meshing of the huge industrial and military machinery of defense with our peaceful methods and goals, so that security and liberty may prosper together.
Akin to, and largely responsible for the sweeping changes in our industrial-military posture, has been the technological revolution during recent decades. In this revolution, research has become central; it also becomes more formalized, complex, and costly. A steadily increasing share is conducted for, by, or at the direction of, the Federal government.
...Partly because of the huge costs involved, a government contract becomes virtually a substitute for intellectual curiosity. For every old blackboard there are now hundreds of new electronic computers. The prospect of domination of the nation's scholars by Federal employment, project allocations, and the power of money is ever present -- and is gravely to be regarded.
Yet, in holding scientific research and discovery in respect, as we should, we must also be alert to the equal and opposite danger that public policy could itself become the captive of a scientific-technological elite.
External quote from link :
- Between September 6 and 7, the Chicago Board Options Exchange saw purchases of 4,744 put options on United Airlines, but only 396 call options… Assuming that 4,000 of the options were bought by people with advance knowledge of the imminent attacks, these “insiders” would have profited by almost $5 million.
- On September 10, 4,516 put options on American Airlines were bought on the Chicago exchange, compared to only 748 calls. Again, there was no news at that point to justify this imbalance;… Again, assuming that 4,000 of these options trades represent “insiders,” they would represent a gain of about $4 million.
- [The levels of put options purchased above were more than six times higher than normal.]
- No similar trading in other airlines occurred on the Chicago exchange in the days immediately preceding Black Tuesday.