It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Budget Cuts Could Shut Down Mars Rover
The Mars Exploration Rover (MER) folks that operate the Spirit and Opportunity robots on the red planet have gotten some bad news.
A directive has come from NASA Headquarters to take a 40 percent financial cut in their program — some $4 million in the remaining months of fiscal year 2008.
"We would have to make some very tough decisions about which one we would hibernate and which one we would keep active. That's a situation I do not want to face...but that's a future worry," Squyres added.
For now, the message back to NASA Headquarters is that, if the MER team has to take the first cut, there is going to be an impact on science return...and in fiscal year 2009, it will be much more severe.
Squyres emphasized that the rovers are in good health and doing good science. Another concern sparked by the budget cut, along with keeping the rovers healthy, is keeping the MER team together and morale high, he said.
SPACE.com has also learned that the venerable NASA Mars orbiter, Odyssey, is on the cost-cutting table, too. Odyssey has been in orbit since 2001.
Originally posted by Blueracer
I don't think that it's such a bad thing. Government spending needs to be cut back. This will save the tax payers a lot of money.
Originally posted by KATSUO
dont tell me they will just shut it down and walk away from 2 perfectly
working rovers.....
Originally posted by jra
Originally posted by Blueracer
I don't think that it's such a bad thing. Government spending needs to be cut back. This will save the tax payers a lot of money.
"A whopping $4 million... that's pocket change as far as Government spending goes."
Maybe. But it is a good start.
[edit on 3/24/2008 by Blueracer]
But shortly after CNN.com published the story, NASA administrator Michael Griffin said the agency will not shut down one of the two Mars rovers, according to spokesman Bob Jacobs.
"There is a process that has to be followed for any mission to be canceled and the cancellation of the Mars Exploration Rovers is not under consideration," Jacobs said. "There is an ongoing budget review within the agency's Mars exploration program. However, shutting down of one of the rovers is not an option."
Originally posted by Blueracer
I don't think that it's such a bad thing. Government spending needs to be cut back. This will save the tax payers a lot of money.
The brave, unflagging Mars rover Spirit, who has lived on the Red Planet for almost four years, has been given a death sentence by the U.S. government.
The U.S. government has forced NASA, this country's national space agency, to cut its budget by 4 million dollars. And that means only one rover, Opportunity, will survive. To say that this is a tragedy is an understatement. The Mars rovers have been one of NASA's proudest achievements, and the information they gather today can help future planetary colonists. While NASA is planning to land another rover on Mars within the next year, it's a shame to shut down a perfectly serviceable rover that could be supplementing what the new rover will learn.
With the Earth population skyrocketing, and urban overcrowding only likely to get far worse over the coming decades, preparing to colonize other planets should be more of a priority than ever. And every time we shut down a NASA program like the rovers, we step backward, away from the goal of leaving Earth. We also hinder our search for knowledge beyond this planet.
If we were talking about a $4 billion dollar budget cut, we'd be talking about an end to manned US spaceflight, most likely. Nasa's overall budget is around $17 billion yearly. Its not really surprising that they'd choose one of the rovers in the midst of a budget cut. They've long outlived their original missions, and while they're still contributing good science, I would imagine that Nasa and the government would rather the remaining funds be directed towards current space projects than a past program whose original goal has already been achieved.