It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Odessy
I understand what your saying, but I dont think speculation out of knowledge or experience requires proof.
Most of these experiences are internal, and the only proof one can give is the way they act in their daily lives, or perhaps to later take on students who share the same experiences, but that takes time and practice that some people are not willing to give.
I think many answers lie in study, meditation, perhaps the Akashic Records if they exist, but they take time, practice, and dedication.
And you should have stuck it out with college. There are some awesome career paths for anything physics, including fun stuff like flying jets
whatever way you believe, thats totally cool.
I believe everyone's path in life will yield similar results, its just how you live your life now that grants you perspective, knowledge, or speculation into the unknown.
Originally posted by Odessy
reply to post by grimreaper797
Everything starts off as an Idea.
Speculations are Ideas.
Knowledge leads to the creation of even more Ideas.
Therefore, knowledge grants speculation...
if X= this, then Y might = that.
and if Y does = that, then B might = something else.
If B does = something else, then A could = something crazy!
all based off our knowledge of X...
but basically what I'm trying to say is, from the knowledge I have gained through meditation and spiritual exersice, I now know that something else is out there...
since I know that, now I form ideas to what that is and why.
I create theories based on those ideas, or speculations, that all stem from my knowledge...
originally posted by grimreaper797
You say you experience it, but what you experience is your own view of reality.
Originally posted by Odessy
ah ha, but I can not prove to you what I know.
All I can tell you is that I have experienced spiritual things.
if speculation is the forming of a hypothesis, well, a hypothesis is defined as an educated guess...
What little knowledge I have of X, I still have enough to speculate new ideas, or hypothesis...
but, I don't expect everyone to see it my way.
I don't even know what my way of thinking is.
What I do know, is that crazy things are possible, even in this life, and I can only ponder what is going to happen in the next.
The truth is no one knows, but one (if compelled to do so) can live this life trying to find out.
You have to ask yourself why we, as humans, have a need to know what happens after death.
You may say that its from fear of the unknown, but I say its for knowledge of something we can feel.
again, just my thoughts.
Originally posted by Odessy
Balance is always the key, and curiosity is what leads us humans into getting lost in our imagination.
My imagination is something I will never give up.
But another question is, is it really too risky to tumble down the rabbit hole?
sure, you might become crazy to other people, but you might also stumble upon something amazing...
most genius minds are a little crazy, wouldnt you agree?
and you can also equate the pendulum effect into the thought process.
for every good, comes bad, and vise versa.
Originally posted by grimreaper797
Well no, there is a constant reality.
Our vision is blinded by our senses though, making it impossible to see. But it is still there. Controlling to what extent our senses distort it is the key in balance. Those whos imaginations are their own "reality" have not controlled it, and let the imbalance run their lives.
Originally posted by LastOutfiniteVoiceEternal
There is a constant imagination. There is a constant everything and a constant nothing.
There is never control. You are simply a reaction of everything else outside of you. You have no thought and thinking otherwise you are admitting that you are delusional. Even your thoughts are only a reaction of everything else exclusive of you.
Originally posted by grimreaper797
Nobody said there wasn't a constant imagination. The idea is to control your imagination.
There is always control over yourself. You are not simply a reaction. Not every thought has to do with the world around you. delusional is not the imagination but letting the imagination go wild. Letting it take over completely. That is delusional.
My thoughts are not just a reaction to the world around me. If that were true then it would be impossible to analyse yourself. The reason the only thing you can know is yourself is because that is the only thing that is not shaded a different color by your senses.
You don't need sight, or taste, or smell to know yourself. You need those thing for the world around you. But tell me, if I ceased to have vision, hearing, taste, smell, feeling of objects. If I ceased to have all the physical senses I have now, would I cease to think?
I would not cease to think because thought is not dependent on senses. It is not dependent on the outside world to have thoughts. What you will think about I am not sure as I have not lived a life without vision, hearing, smelling, tasting, and feeling. To try and say WHAT I would think about in such a position would be speculation. Thoughts themselves are independent of the senses we depend on to experience the outside world.
Originally posted by LastOutfiniteVoiceEternal
Correct, nobody did. Although starting a reply with "Well no..." may send a discrete innuendo to the contrary. Words are very important on these boards; they're all we have to go off of.
Every thought has to do with the world around you, with yourself and with the universe around you and within you.
Delusional is believing that you have the ability to control, when you are only controlled by your own thoughts and your own actions as reactions to the environment and thoughts that you live in and are surrounded by.
Yes, your thoughts are. And no it would not be impossible to analyze yourself. Since yourself exists your thoughts are a reaction of this concept. It's simple to take a look in the mirror and write down notes.
If I can only know thyself then in knowing you, you are also admitting that we are one and the same.
We are always the same, all of us and in all ways, even our differences.
There is no logical escape, and if you continue with confabulation with me you'll quickly see that the former is true if you are not hunched toward a bias.
Yes. You would no longer have the ability to process any information. Others can feel you, touch you, smell you, hear you (speech or not), see you. "Thought" is dependent on the senses.
So you're admitting that everything you just said is speculation and anything that I input from here forth on the topic of senseless thought is speculation, then I digress and will throw out no further information on the explanandum.
You also implicitly admit that the only thing that can be proven for fact is that thought comes from senses and the world around you, the rest would simply be speculation... yet before making those comments you make seemingly absolute claims that "I would not cease to think because thought is not dependent on senses." - "It is not dependent on the outside world to have thoughts."
You are contradicting yourself, you make these claims and simultaneously say that no one knows what one would think about. Then where is your evidence that there is thought at all without sense? Don't you see the mistakes you're making?
I know what I think about when I have senses and it is a dfirect by-product of my universe. That is not speculation, that is a fact and on that premise my argument stands and yours crumbles into empty conjecture and literally pointless arguing of non-existent semantics.