It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
Originally posted by jfj123
Matter is neither created nor destroyed. Where did the pieces go if not into the building?
Maybe if you knew what the nose was made of you would not need to ask that question.
Please do research before posting.
[edit on 21-4-2008 by ULTIMA1]
Originally posted by WraothAscendant
reply to post by jfj123
LoL!!
Isn't a graviton beam fiction? Thusly nailing down and refuting the use of a graviton beam would be a exercise in futility because someone could always come up with different attributes.
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
Originally posted by tezzajw
[Where did the wings go? Why were the alleged wings never forensically identified to any plane?
Without wing debris, it's kind of difficult to assume that a plane crashed.
Yes, plus the fact that 80 ton planes would have left parts and debris, but we still have no information on the parts and debris matching any of the planes.
Originally posted by WraothAscendant
reply to post by jfj123
While I am at it why don't I try to prove or disprove the existence of a higher power?
THEN I am on to world hunger.
World peace.
Where those one socks of a pair go when you do the laundry.
Originally posted by jfj123
I bet that you can't not prove that a heavy graviton beam didn't, not do it... can you ???
Originally posted by _Del_
This is ten times crazier than those guys in the flat earth thread.
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
Originally posted by _Del_
This is ten times crazier than those guys in the flat earth thread.
Whats even more crazy is how you can still live in a fantasy world and not accept facts and evidence presented to you.
I have proven (even with the frames of video posted by others) that the nose, wings and tail did not make it into the building.
The composite and aluminum could not stand up to the steel.
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
Originally posted by jfj123
I bet that you can't not prove that a heavy graviton beam didn't, not do it... can you ???
Just more proof you live in a fantasy world and cannot face reallity.
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
Whats even more crazy is how you can still live in a fantasy world and not accept facts and evidence presented to you.
I have proven (even with the frames of video posted by others) that the nose, wings and tail did not make it into the building.
The composite and aluminum could not stand up to the steel.
Originally posted by jfj123
If the plane never made it into the building, where did it go?
It was a physical plane so the physical parts went somewhere.
Originally posted by tezzajw
Any competent analysis of the crime scene should have recovered wreckage from the plane, which should have been positively identified. Why wasn't this done?
Originally posted by Pilgrum
and the nose, wings & tail are clearly shown from multiple angles enteringthe building
Originally posted by Pilgrum I'm not listening' argument because there simply isn't the solid evidence of conspiracy required OR no-one has presented it yet
Originally posted by tezzajw
Originally posted by jfj123
If the plane never made it into the building, where did it go?
Again, that's the billion dollar question. It's difficult to reconcile that planes hit the towers, when no plane parts have ever been positively identified.
It was a physical plane so the physical parts went somewhere.
How can you state that it is a physical plane, when you can't provide any proof of where the parts went?
Any competent analysis of the crime scene should have recovered wreckage from the plane, which should have been positively identified. Why wasn't this done?
Originally posted by jfj123
Obviously there are 2 choices:
1. Physical, real planes hit the towers
2. Holograms were used to make it look as if real planes hit the towers.