Originally posted by Kokasion
Lokey is Just being a Troll. I can understand you perfectly because intelligence is trandcendent. You're not speaking in another language so you're fine. Shame on you Lokey, either you're out of ideas or just tired of the subject, I suppose.

lol thats wot i thought tbh i am very very tired and have not so long ago got back from a night shift but i tend not to care to much as to wot some fool who seems to think there is no way forward for other energy in the next 20yrs or other Untapped source's of energy he sure is cutting edge stuff

maybe he should look up "hydrates" fusion, solour, wind turbine's, god theres loads nuclear even all could replace the more polluting oil, with in 5-10yrs if pushed! hard enuff by your government! ok maybe not fusion power in that time but the 20yr mark easy, but hey just let the fool ramble on about his oil & still being deppendant on it in 20yrs

That was the most interesting part of the Video. In the Beginning, Tom showed a Chart of Countries consupmtions or whatever, Nuclear Energy. Blah blah blah. I've been up all night.

[point] US was the lowest. Because they're looking at other energies. I think France was highest. It could have been Russian because the flags are so similar, I don't know. Even though America was on top of the Nuclear Energy thing.

[edit]That looked kind of Confusing. America was the lowest consumption of Nuclear Energy, Though we were the frontiersmen for the industry.

[edit on 14/3/08 by Kokasion]

You guys are way off topic, we aren't talking about nuclear energy or tesla. If you would like to have a discussion about different means of energy I propose the two of you start another thread; since all you have been doing here is having a conversation with one another.

[edit on 15-3-2008 by Lokey13]

[edit on 15-3-2008 by Lokey13]

Originally posted by Lokey13
I don't think I have to comment on you gramatical errors you should be able to see them, you made enough. But if you realistically think a different energy source is going to be readily available in the next 20 years your crazy.

I think you mean grammatical, not gramatical, correct? Also, it's you're, not your. As in you are, your implies possession. Cracks me up when people rag on grammatical errors that have grammatical errors in their(not there) posts.

On topic: You would have to agree there is definitely a finite amount of oil on our planet. Last time I checked, we were not on an infinite amount of matter. Another poster made a good point about cheap oil and extracting it. At some point, we will run out of available cheap oil and the cost of extracting other oil sources will prove to be too costly.

Originally posted by Lokey13
I posted many articles stating why the Earth will not run out of oil, maybe you should read them. tsop taerg ruoy rof sknaht

I did read the articles and disagree with them for the reason I stated above. No comment on your poor grammar, eh?

You're correct, I haven't contributed anything intelligent like this:

"I don't think I have to comment on you gramatical errors you should be able to see them, you made enough. But if you realistically think a different energy source is going to be readily available in the next 20 years your crazy."

I guess if I disagree with you, it's unintelligent. I offered a very simple explanation. It's quite obvious that there is a finite amount of oil because the rock that we live on is finite in size.

"antaginistic" WOW! And you rag on others grammar. The next time you knock someone else's grammar and then butcher the English language the way you have, prepare to be called out.

You're still being quite "antaginistic", you hadn't showed up on this thread till now and your only purpose seems to be to back up someone else who couldn't find my grammatical errors as easily as you seemed to; so Kudos for finding something that had nothing to do with you. Also your "opinion" is just simply an "opinion" you didn't state any factual information or link to any credible sources: so yes your posts are still very unintelligent and antaginistic since you still haven't contributed anything to the thread in the way of what the topic states. Unless your a Professor of Geology your opinion in this matter means nothing, not just to me, but to anyone looking to be educated on the matter. I'm happy you have a great understanding of the english language and I hope it furthers your "opinions" in the future since your not here to trade information but instead are here to trade blows on a different front. The matter with the other two posters had nothing to do with you and still doesn't. Maybe if I entered every post I had into MSWord before I posted it my errors wouldn't be so noticable too; only if I had time for that sort nonsense. Next post I would like some information that will educate me further on why your "opinion" is credible: if there isn't any you will be ignored. Again thanks for your great post, I've learnt so much.

[edit on 16-3-2008 by Lokey13]

Hey people, i thought this was a good thread, with great subject matter.
But this isnt on topic, and is turning into a slug fest.
Relax.....

[edit on 16-3-2008 by Denied]

Let me get this straight: I need to post factual evidence the world we live on is finite in size? Do you know the difference between infinite and finite? Apparently you don't and I can feel my IQ points slipping discussing this inane subject with you.

One other point for you: it's not necessary to post in MS word to know your grammatical errors. You see that red line under your grammar errors when you are posting? Didn't think so, because you can't seem to grasp the obvious. Buh-bye!

Edit to add: Don't worried Denied, I won't be posting on this thread any longer because I can't seem to find the link to prove the world is finite in size.

[edit on 3-16-2008 by nyarlathotep]

Double post oops.

[edit on 16-3-2008 by Denied]

I don't know if its ever been proven that oil comes from plants or ortherwise, I hope someone has an answer there?
This Lindsy williams fellow is to me a very credible, straightforward individual. He comes across as very pashionate and honest, though, we don't really know?
I watched a video by him about money, and he was saying that if america was flooded with cheap alaskan oil, then really the whole system would collapse. The system requires that we spend, every last dollar we earn, the system doesn't allow for cheap oil. Which is why petrol/gas is going up and up, even though supply is on the up as well. The U.S. media is reporting oil supplies down, while the opec suppliers are saying they are meeting more than the demand requires?
So who's telling the truth. I read and have been told years ago about the neverending supply of oil, However, I don't think people factored in massive population growth as well as everybody (including former "third world" countries) driving cars. China licenses twenty odd million new cars every year, india is not far behind. If you added up the amount of fuel being burnt each day, worldwide, I think the answer would shock, thats a lot of oil,and the amount is growing by the day, its easy to see that something has to give..