posted on Mar, 12 2008 @ 05:40 PM
Just to further the discussion on what may have really happened on 911, here's my 'theory' that I think fits the facts better than any other.
Cheney and the NeoCons needed an excuse to strike pre-emptively at Afganistan, Irag and Iran. The plans for invading Afganistan were in place, ready
to go BEFORE 911(this has been documented). Bin Laden was a made to order patsy (and there is some evidence that he is in fact a willing accomplice of
the CIA resulting from the CIA funded war against the Soviet occupation of Afganistan).
The US military/intelligence community recruited and trained Mohamed Atta and the others (substantial evidence of training at US military bases) and
may have told them that they would be participating in military exercises involving simulated hijackings on 911.
Rumsfeld has to admit infront of Congress on September 10th, that 2.3 trillion $ of military spending can't be accounted for. Congress tells him to
find out what happened to the money. That task is assigned to a group of civilian analysts working for the Pentagon, who just happened to be working
in that part of the pentagon that was destroyed, thereby killing all of the analysts.
As many as 15 military exercises were planned for September 11th, some of which diverted fighter planes to Canada and Alaska while others flooded the
Air Traffic Control system with bogus radar returns from 'hijacked' airliners. (this has also been documented)
The four commercial flights were taken over by remote control using AWACS planes that were seen flying in New York and Washington on 911. The
technology to do this has been rumoured to exist for quite some time. The twin towers were hit by planes. The Pentagon was NOT hit by a plane. The
explosion was cased by preplanted explosives. Because hitting the building in exactly the right spot at ground level would have been very difficult to
do by remote control, and since no pilot would volunteer for a suicide mission, the plane was actually flown OVER the pentagon (as described by at
least one eye witness who was in a position to see it) and the commercial airliner was likely redirected over the ocean afterwards and allowed to
crash in the water. That's why no plane wreckage was found at the pentagon.
Flight 93 was shot down over Pennsylvania by fighters. This explains why the debris was scattered over 8 square miles and why witnesses on the ground
heard and saw an explosion in the sky. One possible explanation for shooting down that plane may have been that the pilot may have been able to regain
control and if the plane had landed intact, the temporary loss of manual control would have been 'embarassing' for the official version.
The twin towers were NOT brought down by the government. They were brought down by Henry Silverstein, who had leased them several months previously
and faced a mandatory billion $ bill to have all asbetos removed. The Mossad, who were filming the event as it happened, had warned Silverstein that
the towers would be hit by planes. Silverstein then insured both building for billions against a terrorist attack, then arranged to have the buildings
wired with thermite, which burns hot enough to cause the pools of molten metal found weeks later, and proceeded to cash in on the event.
Silverstein gets a huge multi-billion $ insurance windfall.
The pentagon no longer has to explain where the missing trillions went.
The NeoCons get their 'New Pearl Harbour'.
Atta and the other patsies make convenient scapegoats.
Other interesting facts.
Bin laden supposedly communicates with his minions by satellite phone. That satellite phone depends on a network of low orbit satellites owned by a
company that went bankrupt. The company was bought out and allowed to continue operating by the Bin Laden family(this has been confirmed and
documented). The Bin Ladens and the Bushes are close friends(not disputed) Is Osama just playing the role that Bush Senior wants him to play?