The state of 9/11 Truth: not pretty, page 16


Pages: <<  13    14    15    16  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 2 times


reply posted on 21-3-2008 @ 01:48 PM by weedwhacker
reply to post by bsbray11



bs, I guess I touched a nerve. Didn't mean to....

I suppose, conspiracies will exist, always and ever. JFK has gotten lots of traction, but RFK hasn't. Why!?!? Since I'm in the 1968 era, what about Martin Luther? Why the silence, compared to the HUGE JFK stuff?

OK, back to now....let's tear this thing (9/11) down, and find the conspirators, if they exist! Seriously, if this was a psych-op, then it MUST be revealed! Because, while trying to keep politics out of it, we can't when we consider the nature of USA political nature, and the subsequent actions of these traitors...(Oops, I just revealed MY bias...)


reply posted on 22-3-2008 @ 01:35 PM by coughymachine
reply to post by jthomas


I'm just delighted to have demonstrated the following:

  • You are dishonest
  • There is an 'official' account of the events of 9/11
  • The 9/11 Commission Report is flawed in many ways
  • Notwithstanding the above, you agree with the Report's conclusions

And to think, you started this thread to argue that the state of 9/11 Truth was not pretty.


reply posted on 22-3-2008 @ 01:51 PM by coughymachine
reply to post by jthomas


Yes, you stick with the evidence developed by a Commission that was set up to fail and whose Official Report is based in part on lies.

Yes, that makes perfect sense.


reply posted on 22-3-2008 @ 02:04 PM by jthomas
Originally posted by coughymachine
reply to
post by jthomas


Yes, you stick with the evidence developed by a Commission that was set up to fail and whose Official Report is based in part on lies.


Your premise is wrong. The evidence never depended on the 9/11 Commission nor was it "developed" by the 9/11 Commission.


reply posted on 22-3-2008 @ 02:13 PM by coughymachine
reply to post by jthomas


Is it your position that the 9/11 Commission never developed any evidence relating to the events of 9/11?



reply posted on 24-3-2008 @ 06:23 PM by gottago
reply to post by tha stillz



And don't forget that pipeline. The poppies only pay the rent at Langley.

And more generally, war is good for business--especially if it's in backward places that have lots of oil, natural gas and poppies, and particularly if you happen to be ex-oilpersons (can't forget Condi!), sons of top spooks, and former CEOs of top military contractors.
Pages: <<  13    14    15    16  >>    ^^TOP^^



Why the Pentagon?
  Posted 3 days ago with 12 member flags
NEVER FORGET 9-11….Maybe we SHOULD forget.
  Posted 11 days ago with 11 member flags
Personal Theory on The Twin Towers Plane Pilots
  Posted 0 days ago with 8 member flags
The 9/11 Hijackers: Fraud in Official Video Exhibits Uncovered
  Posted 1 days ago with 7 member flags
Note from trapped workers surfaces 10 years after 9/11
  Posted 1 days ago with 6 member flags
Where were you when the world stopped turning...
  Posted 2 days ago with 4 member flags