The state of 9/11 Truth: not pretty, page 16
Pages: <<  13    14    15    16  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 2 times


reply posted on 21-3-2008 @ 01:48 PM by weedwhacker
reply to post by bsbray11



bs, I guess I touched a nerve. Didn't mean to....

I suppose, conspiracies will exist, always and ever. JFK has gotten lots of traction, but RFK hasn't. Why!?!? Since I'm in the 1968 era, what about Martin Luther? Why the silence, compared to the HUGE JFK stuff?

OK, back to now....let's tear this thing (9/11) down, and find the conspirators, if they exist! Seriously, if this was a psych-op, then it MUST be revealed! Because, while trying to keep politics out of it, we can't when we consider the nature of USA political nature, and the subsequent actions of these traitors...(Oops, I just revealed MY bias...)


reply posted on 22-3-2008 @ 01:35 PM by coughymachine
reply to post by jthomas


I'm just delighted to have demonstrated the following:

  • You are dishonest
  • There is an 'official' account of the events of 9/11
  • The 9/11 Commission Report is flawed in many ways
  • Notwithstanding the above, you agree with the Report's conclusions

And to think, you started this thread to argue that the state of 9/11 Truth was not pretty.


reply posted on 22-3-2008 @ 01:51 PM by coughymachine
reply to post by jthomas


Yes, you stick with the evidence developed by a Commission that was set up to fail and whose Official Report is based in part on lies.

Yes, that makes perfect sense.


reply posted on 22-3-2008 @ 02:04 PM by jthomas
Originally posted by coughymachine
reply to
post by jthomas


Yes, you stick with the evidence developed by a Commission that was set up to fail and whose Official Report is based in part on lies.


Your premise is wrong. The evidence never depended on the 9/11 Commission nor was it "developed" by the 9/11 Commission.


reply posted on 22-3-2008 @ 02:13 PM by coughymachine
reply to post by jthomas


Is it your position that the 9/11 Commission never developed any evidence relating to the events of 9/11?



reply posted on 24-3-2008 @ 06:23 PM by gottago
reply to post by tha stillz



And don't forget that pipeline. The poppies only pay the rent at Langley.

And more generally, war is good for business--especially if it's in backward places that have lots of oil, natural gas and poppies, and particularly if you happen to be ex-oilpersons (can't forget Condi!), sons of top spooks, and former CEOs of top military contractors.
Pages: <<  13    14    15    16  >>    ^^TOP^^



Flight 93 was headed for Building 7
  Posted 10 days ago with 48 member flags
9/11 INTERCEPTED
  Posted 2 days ago with 45 member flags
9/11: The WTC Elevator Key
  Posted 13 days ago with 43 member flags
What are your favorite 9/11 debunking tactics?
  Posted 6 days ago with 17 member flags
Who is the Joker on ATS radio now running their mouth?
  Posted 14 days ago with 13 member flags
Was the government a co-conspirator?
  Posted 16 days ago with 9 member flags
British Police Want Us To Present False Flag Terror Evidence.
  Posted 6 days ago with 8 member flags