posted on Mar, 12 2008 @ 11:04 AM
jthomas - if your impeccable use of logic forces you to conclude the reason no journalist attended the European Parliament was "lack of interest" I
won't be enrolling in your class.
Former Italian President Francesco Cossiga is frequently quoted in the media but when he asserts that the 9/11 attacks were an inside job and that
this is common knowledge amongst global intelligence agencies his statement suffers from "lack of interest" and is not covered.
When the Japanese Prime Minister is challenged for 30 minutes in a session of the defence and foreign affairs committee about the lies of 9/11 every
single mainstream journalist shares the same "lack of interest".
Was it through "lack of interest" that Bush & Co didn't want an investigation into 9/11 in the first place?
In the U.K. only a tiny minority of people are aware of the 9/11 truth movement. Although many use the internet, most still get their news from
mainstream broadcasting and papers. U.K. TV has given zero coverage to the truth movement (unless you count the single documentary the BBC made to
discredit it). I doubt the situation is very different in the Netherlands. Yet, I've never found anyone who's not interested in the subject when
introduced to it.
So, 1,000 journalists are invited to attend the European Parliament's 9/11 Independent Commission of Enquiry - and, as you say, "ZERO attended. Not
one journalist showed up. Zero." If that doesn't convince you that the mainstream media is monolithic and state controlled, nothing will.
I should put aside your logic textbooks for a moment and learn a little about how intelligence agencies control the media and orchestrate mass
delusion: William Schaap - (Part 1 of 8) - The Media, CIA, FBI & Disinfo.