Originally posted by TheLoony
Nice to see someone still thinking, at least, about the anthrax after 9/11. Seems to have been a forgotten part of the story.
There are many forgotten parts, not just that one, but yeah, agreed.
Along those lines, I want to remind you all of the evidence that the hijackers were pursuing crop dusters and related information. Some think that
might have been just a cover to throw off intelligence agencies. Others contend that there were other elements to the plot that were thwarted, that
being one of them- and the mysterious painted van being another. It is a huge web of uncertainty, this case. Who to trust, who to believe, and who to
follow. Don't be misled by anyone or any "truth" movement enclave. It's still all up for grabs, and open to interpretation.
The pentagon may soon find itself in a bind if it is discovered that they destroyed or tampered with the tapes/media of the incoming whatever it was.
Imagine if the reason for FOIA denials lies more in that they do not want to disclose a covert technology than them not wanting to show us what hit
it. At that point you have to ask the Supreme Court Justices who's side they are really on, when they are sworn to neutrality. But hey, you said it
was flight 77. Prove it.