It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Dark Skies
Originally posted by jimbo999
reply to post by xDove007
He was 'found' thousands of years ago 'The Beast' simply refers to the Roman Emperor. Any credible biblical scholar will tell you this.
J.
[edit on 29-1-2008 by jimbo999]
Not in the operative verse here. It is a man (the word used is "therion" for beast and "anthropos" for man in Greek)...
Rev 13:18 "Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a MAN; and his number [is] Six hundred threescore [and] six."
This implies the "antichrist" who may certainly lead a country or an organization or an army...but the antichrist is a single individual.
If you know of some "credible biblical scholars" who believe as you say, perhaps you can provide names.
I refer you to Chuck Missler,
HERE
Thx.
And WHAT exactly do you think the roman Emperor WAS? He was a man!! Julius Ceasar was a man. Nero was man. Claudius was - yep, you guessed it - a man.
No mystery here I'm afraid. The 'Beast' is, as scholars have always stated, the roman Emperor - who was also, yes...a man. It was a code word used by the jews and early christians when critcising the Emperor (a crime punishable by death, by the way..). Do the research - it 's all out there, and free to read.
Try Googling 'early christian studies+roman empire' for instance...
J.
[edit on 29-1-2008 by Dark Skies]
[edit on 29-1-2008 by Dark Skies]
[edit on 29-1-2008 by Dark Skies]
Originally posted by jimbo999
reply to post by Elisha4Yah
Problem is of course is that this was most likely 'written' by some itinerant jewish or christian priest. Revelation is a work of fiction - historically proven to be so in fact. The research is out there, easy to locate. All you've got to do is actually WANT to know the truth.
J.
Originally posted by DisgustedOne
reply to post by jimbo999
I am kind of new around here, so forgive me if my ignorance shows. I do not know who this "Chuck" is that is referenced, but there seems to be a debate as to his credentials. I'm OK with that for now. I am curious about who you would consider a credible source for this topic? I intend to compare.
Thanks
Originally posted by Elisha4Yah
Originally posted by jimbo999
reply to post by Elisha4Yah
Problem is of course is that this was most likely 'written' by some itinerant jewish or christian priest. Revelation is a work of fiction - historically proven to be so in fact. The research is out there, easy to locate. All you've got to do is actually WANT to know the truth.
J.
I've heard and read a lot of debunking of the book of Revelation and have yet to find anything worthy enough to even give a second thought. I am a skeptical person, believe it or not. But I'm more apt to investigate further when I read opposition against the Scriptures, especially the book of Revelation. My reason; my faith in Yahshua. I defend the truth and will continue to do so, no matter what. The book of Revelation is an unveiling of 'who' the Son of man is. Everything in it is about Him and what He did and what He does, what happens, what is happening, the blessings, the curses and so on. It is mainly intended to be a book of comfort for believers in this world, because while we are in this world we will suffer tribulation.
Here's a thought. How can a person who doesn't believe in Yahshua as Messiah ever think he/she can speak any truth whatsoever about Him? If you don't believe, you are in darkness and His light makes no sense to you. I don't understand all there is to understand in the Scriptures, I'm still here and continue to seek Him in faith and trust. But how can a person who doesn't even believe in Him talk about Him like he/she knows something? A non-believer listens to man and his lies, a believer listens to The Word of Truth, the ONLY one who can save us. Man can save you from choking but you might get hit by a bus an hour later. Yahshua can save you from all things. True life does not lay in the flesh.
Originally posted by ProfEmeritus
With all the talk about 666, I'd like to point out that recent discoveries of new manuscripts indicate that the actual number was 616, and many scholars believe that it referred to Caligula.
See the following link to details:
www.aymnetwork.com...
Originally posted by Quazga
Did you ever realize that revelation wasn't written by John of Patmos... it was written by another scholar (idiot)
Originally posted by jimbo999
Whose 'Truth'? Your 'Truth'? Biblical 'Truth'? It's fiction my friend Biblical scholars have proved this decades ago. Beyond a shadow of a doubt.
Sorry to break this to you.
J.
Originally posted by xDove007
Prephecies are like riddles. We could either take them literally, or analyze what it could possibly mean. Even so, not "everyone" can pick apart and find its meaning. It takes a person whose a) religious or b) a scholar of sorts.
Which leads me to say that finding the "beast" is not as easy as cutting out a piece of cake.
Originally posted by Quazga
Why do you people continue to believe that the rapture is some kind of actual doctrine? It was made up long after the reformation. Catholics don't have any doctrine of Rapture, nor to the Orhtodox, are they not Christians?
Geesh...