Ohio State Board of Education infuriates Evolution Supporters by new Lesson Plan, page 1
Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times
Topic started on 13-2-2004 @ 07:23 AM by BlackJackal
Well this just cooks my goose. Evolution supporters are pissed off because of a class titled "Critical Analysis of Evolution". The opponents of the class fear that it may lead to having intelligent design taught in the classrooms. Thats right, the lesson has nothing to do with "intelligent design" they just fear that it may lead to it.

This is nothing but censorship. Why in the hell can't our children be taught both the theory of evolution and the theory of Intelligent Design to allow them to be truly educated? What would that hurt? By only allowing one item to be taught you are basically starting a trend in which you will only learn what the government wants you to learn.

www.cleveland.com.../base/news/1076495549160490.xml

The State Board of Education gave preliminary approval Tuesday to a 10th-grade biology lesson that scientists say could put "intelligent design" in Ohio classrooms.

Setting aside an impassioned plea from the National Academy of Sciences, the board voted 13-4 to declare its intent to adopt the "Critical Analysis of Evolution" lesson next month.

The academy warned that doing so would give a green light to teaching intelligent design, the idea that life is so complex that a higher being must have created it.



reply posted on 16-2-2004 @ 03:47 PM by BlackJackal
Originally posted by amantine
Intelligent Design does not belong in any science class. It has no supporting evidence and is not falsifiable. Evolution has both these properties. Intelligent Design should be taught in the religion classes or maybe philosophy.


This is taken from a post I made here
www.abovetopsecret.com... but I think it fits here as well.

I am not quoting any religions beleifs when I stated that we had to have been created by intelligent design I am only posting what is logical.

It is illogical to think that something as complex as the human being could have created itself from raw materials on the earth. It is way more sci-fi to think that we were all created in a sludge pit of amino acids than to think of travelling at light speed. The dynamics that would need to be in place to have that interaction take place are staggering. Add to that the fact that after this first form of life created itself it would have to be able to reproduce itself or it would die out.

So think about what you are saying

1. Somehow everything just came together and chemicals that are not supposed to interact, interacted and created life.

2. This one life has created every form of life on earth that you now see. (If this is so then why and how did it change into different things) Why did certain creatures evolve just to be the food of other creatures. True evolution would mean everything would evolve to be the best not less than the best.

3. This first life somehow found a way to reproduce itself after it created itself.

A little far-fetched don't you think?


Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^



A MUST Read, "Written By A Female Cop"
  Posted 4 days ago with 34 member flags
Know your enemy ... the Daily Mail & Viscount Rothermere
  Posted 14 days ago with 17 member flags
***Programming The Nation FULL Video- Limited Time Only!!***
  Posted 0 days ago with 14 member flags
Pictures That Shocked The World (viewer discretion advised)
  Posted 2 days ago with 12 member flags