reply to post by disgustedbyhumanity
Your post makes sense. the only additional problem is, as the article points out, we may not really have all of the gold to back up the dollar that
we think we have. In other words, the gold is not officially hand counted, therefore by the FEDS using it to pay commitments, it is dangerous because
we do not physically have the gold in our reserves. Without having the actual gold in our hands, we cannot back the dollar for squat. That is why,
as marg pointed out, China is backing off.
Ya know, a funny thing i read on a survival thread here on ATS is that the person suggests a list of things to have when the stuff hits the fan. He
suggests to have things to trade with. The number one thing he says to have is gold, as it will always be wanted. I wonder if he still recommends
that.