It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by skyshow
Right now big religion does just as she pleases, it would be nice if there were in place something akin to an institutional review board (IRB) at Universities that oversees all research and makes sure that it (departments faculty, graduate students , grant based research etc...) conducts research in an ethical manner that does not in any way harm the participant...people are "participants" when they go to church, and with thousands of various denominations, and the rampant corruption we see and the huge history of bloodshed and horrendous crimes all in the name of God and religion...really it's now time more than ever for the organized religions to begin having in place ethical review boards.
Originally posted by skyshow
I would like to see a voluntary (initially) ethics review board made of community wide stakeholders (clergy, customers of the church, Professors, students, members of community leadership such as business and community organizations...Govn't would be great but there is a separation of state and religion so we have to leave out govn't, although couldn't members of the govn't be on such a board? essensually a board made of a well rounded and representative base representing society in general...)to oversee all religious activities...
Originally posted by skyshow
Churches who can't abide by what the board believes is in the the best interest of the people will have their charters revoked and be unable to practice religion in this country.
Originally posted by skyshow
And at the entrance to all churches and on the cover of the bible and all publications, just like on a pack of cigarettes the following message:
Warning: Religiosity may be dangerous to your intellectual and emotional health and may cause deficiencies in logic, artificial suspension of disbelief, mood swings, marital / family problems, delusional thoughts and behavior, acute psychosis, suicide, and economic hardship.
here's another
Warning: Big Religion may indoctrinate you into a belief system you wouldn't ordinarily in sound mind adopt, that may result in lack of funding for health care, education, social services, public infrastructure and increased funding for war and defense.
As I said in Europe it is solved by law. If Church or religious community violates the law, they are going to court. Simple as that. There is no need for regulation body. There is need for Act about religious communities.
Originally posted by skyshow
Because government is not always representative of the people, and particularly in those governments that are less democratic...I am proposing one made up of STAKEHOLDERS of the community. For example. several members from various churches, some clergy, a few randomly selected public citizens, community leaders, professors and graduate students....
Originally posted by skyshow
a broad based representation of society that would meet regularly to discuss the impact of these activities on all aspects of life...taking money for instance, from an elderly women who needs it to buy her medicine, would obviously get the ax. Using a state owned jet to fly your revival meetings around the country to save sinners, while buying the jet fuel with tax payers money would obviously not cut the muster. But the idea being that the government doesn't do it, thus it should be somewhat better protected from political ideologies, in that you would expect your review board to be made up of a "broad based representation of society".
Originally posted by skyshow
Also in our country (USA) we have separation of church and state as / per the Constitution, and also in legal precedent.
Originally posted by skyshow
Thus our struggles with prayer in school, having the ten commandments posted at the court house, or providing contraceptives to curb teen pregnancies and sexually transmitted diseases...or any one of the myriad of religious issues we face...the big struggle is depending on the issue, a push for more state control, or more church control. If we don't do something, someone eventually is going to push an amendment to overturn this, and then you'll have a government body like what this guy from the Eastern Europe area says they have...
Originally posted by skyshow
reply to post by Vojvoda
Your not understanding me. This is not a government agency for the umpteenth millionth time!!! It is a call, a bid for the churches and religious organizations to come together and create the IRB. What part of this is not government agency don't you understand?
Originally posted by skyshow
Otherwise, thanks for the information. This proposal is made up of a voluntary effort at self regulation (signed legally binding agreements to abide by the charter and recommendations, but they set it up), but inclusive of the greater community at large.
Originally posted by skyshow
That's not the same either. Although it's close. I'm using the stakeholder model....it doesn't just include people from the churches. Big difference there. it represents even the non-believers, because the behavior of the church can even effect them...I appreciate your good will and effort at contributing, but this organization is not exactly what I am proposing. In my model the foxes don't guard the hen house.
[edit on 21-1-2008 by skyshow]