It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by bakednutz
PLEASE read about the founder of scientology, very interesting.
en.wikipedia.org...
Im sure after reading about the founder of scientology you will find he is a very nice fellow with great intentions.
There was never any attempt or intent on my part by the writing of these policies (or any others for that fact), to authorize illegal or harassment type acts against anyone. As soon as it became apparent to me that the concept of 'Fair Game' as described above was being misinterpreted by the uninformed, to mean the granting of a license to Scientologists for acts in violation of the law and/or other standards of decency, these policies were canceled."
In 1977, Scientology offices on both coasts of the United States were raided by FBI agents seeking evidence of Operation Snow White, a church-run espionage network. Hubbard's wife Mary Sue and a dozen other senior Scientology officials were convicted in 1979 of conspiracy against the United States federal government,
In 1978, as part of a case against three French Scientologists, Hubbard was convicted of "making fraudulent promises" and given a four year prison sentence and a 35,000₣ fine by a French court.[
The judgment of the High court of London (Family Division) quotes the single judge, Latey, that Scientology is "dangerous, immoral, sinister and corrupt"
Originally posted by DogHead
Ad hominem AGAIN?
What does the great book of L Ron tell you to do when that fails and no one wants to purchase any snake oil?
Watch another video by a sawn-off bisexual hollywood actor?
Any evidence to support the genuineness of Scientology? Its status as a religion in general terms? Its charitable works? How about a body of art and literature inspired by it? Oh that's right, it's all copyright and trademarked so no one within this supposed religion is allowed to actually add to its alleged religious corpus.
As far as the charity, I just did a quick search and found that they give alot of anti-drug lectures at schools.....
I'd be willing to bet that a few of those half million members have created art and literature inspired by scientology, what do you think?
You're stuck on religion in the "classic" sense. Times change buddy. Welcome to the age of for-profit-religion and copyrighted bibles. Show me a definition of religion where it says it can't be for profit and copyrighted. Your point is moot.
Originally posted by bakednutz
reply to post by benign.psychosis
First of all are you a scientologist?
Second, what else could possibly be meant by the following except for EXACTLY what was said?
"Fair Game" was introduced by Hubbard as a policy against people or groups that "actively seeks to suppress or damage Scientology or a Scientologist by Suppressive Acts." He defined it as: ENEMY — SP Order. Fair game. May be deprived of property or injured by any means by any Scientologist without any discipline of the Scientologist. May be tricked, sued or lied to or destroyed.
a person who possesses a distinct set of characteristics and mental attitudes that cause him to suppress other people in his vicinity. This is the person whose behavior is calculated to be disastrous. Also called antisocial personality.
SP Order. Fair game. May be deprived of property or injured by any means by any Scientologist without any discipline of the Scientologist. May be tricked, sued or lied to or destroyed.
That is funny, considering that hubbard was a Huge drug user.
Well I think your a betting man. And that your bet is in no way proof of the original question.
You tell me one legitimate church that is out there for profit. Not a cult, a mainstream church and evidence of such. Copyrighted bibles are not distributed by the a church or a religion so they are not making money off those. There is no definition of where it says religion cant be for profit and copyright but scientology fits more into the definition of cult rather than religion.
Originally posted by benign.psychosis
It also doesn't change the fact that catholic priests have been known to molest children. That is pretty evil and vile if you ask me.
Why don't you start a petition for Germany to ban Catholicism too? Do you think you've heard the last case of Child molestation by a priest?
How about Islam? Their religion promotes a Holy war against the Infidels and is the basis for some "terrorist" attacks.
Why not the Jewish religion too? It claims that they are the "Master Race" in no uncertain terms.
Most religions have a mythology that can not be proven, their own set of morals and guidelines, and they create a system so that people fall in line with themt. Scientology is no different in that regard...
I´m afraid you are mixing a few things up here. Of course a child molesting priest is unacceptable. But he does not do it on behalf of his church - or do you know a catholic scripture that advocates or requires catholics to molest children?
The difference is that Scientology has set guidelines and beliefs that go against the civil order. But the immediate big problem of Scientology is that they ARE primarily a business scheme in the german perception, but of course try and get the status of a church to reap the tax- and other benefits.
The Catholic church used to have the perception that anyone who questioned it was wrong, and so they were burned at the stake. Perception is not always right... as for taxes, I don't see that as an arguing point against Scientology. Many people on ATS protest taxes and cheer on individuals such as the Browns. In the end, the german government has the right to do what it sees fit according to its own laws, but the question of freedom of religion still stands.
Scientology in Germany takes this perception and tries to spin it around, calling it religious intolerance. It is not. Social standards are not universal, are different from society to society, and under the german perception Scientology is just a business dealing in alternate pseudopsychatry with some funny ideas.
It is curious that the worlds third largest pharmaseutical economy would have that perception, especially when an organized group of people boycott it, and spread the message of it's "evils." It is also curous that it is being associated with the Nazis.
Do you see something wrong with alternative medicine? By the way, the status-quo considers most subjects on this site as funny ideas, but does that make those ideas wrong?
All religions have a certain degree of freedom in their beliefs. There are also quite drastic passages in the bible... as well as very benevolent ones in all the old scriptures. An enlightened society can tolerate these under the assumption that any sane minded person would not take these passages literally, but rather as moral allegories. And as always, most of the passages in old texts as the Quran, the Bible or the Talmud can be interpreted quite broadly.
Does a broad interpretation a religion make?
Noone in Germany, or in the DOZENS of other countries where they ran into problems, has ever been stopped from believing into the whole Thetan and Audition business. Everyone is still free to believe into anything they like, and be it the mighty Spaghetti monster in the sky, and when they are discriminated against, they will be protected by the same laws that apply to any other believer of a certain faith. The ORGANIZATION Scientology and its spokespersons are just crying and kicking on the floor because their "Scientology Church" does not get the lawful status of a church according to german law and perception.
I recall that the majority of states used to have problems with black people, does that make black people wrong?
It's not as much as "crying and kicking" as it is that Germany is looking into procedures for a possible ban of the organized religion altogether.
Originally posted by benign.psychosis
...Have you ever read the official scientology bible, or whatever it is? If so, how did you obtain it? Or are you perhaps just getting your "facts" from the media spin and hate sites?
The Catholic church used to have the perception that anyone who questioned it was wrong, and so they were burned at the stake. Perception is not always right...
...as for taxes, I don't see that as an arguing point against Scientology. [...] In the end, the german government has the right to do what it sees fit according to its own laws, but the question of freedom of religion still stands.
It is curious that the worlds third largest pharmaseutical economy would have that perception, especially when an organized group of people boycott it, and spread the message of it's "evils." It is also curous that it is being associated with the Nazis.
Does a broad interpretation a religion make?
I recall that the majority of states used to have problems with black people, does that make black people wrong?
It's not as much as "crying and kicking" as it is that Germany is looking into procedures for a possible ban of the organized religion altogether.