It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Shawn B.
He said that, but did he say that we'd know what his words were? How can we be sure we know what his exact words were?
Originally posted by AshleyD
1) There were too many eyewitnesses still alive when the Gospels were written (three of them were even written by original eye witnesses) and would have exposed them as fakes. This was done many times- anytime someone tried to squeeze in a fake document, they were exposed as impostors.
2) It would make no sense for Matthew and Mark (where this prophecy is found) to twist it around- just say it like it is, guys.
4) The authors of these Gospels (as well as the other apostles with the exception of John and Judas) died defending their accounts- which would have been insane if they had all been lying. No one would die for what they knew was a lie.
5) It would be illogical for a warning to be issued then purposely twisted into something totally opposite. Remember, they thought it was fully possible for Jesus to return in their lifetimes. If the warning was something else, they would be giving that warning- not the exact opposite.
Some people seem to forget Jesus did not preach to a few dozen people. He ministered to TENS OF THOUSANDS and appeared to HUNDREDS after His resurrection. There are simply too many people who testify to the actual events, gave their lives declaring it was true (the apostles, early church fathers and laymen Christians), etc. It borders on the ridiculous to claim these teachings were not the original (especially when documented in the first and second centuries as being authentic by extrabiblical witnesses) and is just about as ridiculous as the argument to claim Jesus never existed.
Originally posted by Shawn B.
None were alive when a bible was made.
The people who exposed them as "fakes" were rulers of the country at that time
I'm not saying that it is incorrect, but that we can't prove what we're reading is his words.
Peter died because the Romans accused him of killing Simon Magnus. They died defending their accounts, but dissagreed with eachother on the accounts which is most likely why they contradict and leave things out that others have.
No, I know he preached to a lot, but I know that a lot including his own disciples dissgreed and forgot a lot of his teachings...
not to mention they weren't alive when the bible was made.
There were tons of different sects of christians for hundreds of years, then the government forced them together and now there's tons of different sects again.
1. In the prophecies of Patriarch Jacob about each of his sons becoming the progenitors of the tribes of Israel, the fate of Dan's ancestors is depicted in such a way that can only be ascribed to the Antichrist.
"Dan shall be a serpent on the way, an adder in the path..." (Genesis 49, 17)
2. In the prophecies of Ierenim: "From Dan himself...(Ierenim VIII,16)
3. In the prophecies of the Apocalypse, enumerating the remainder of all the tribes of Israel, marked by the Angel for salvation, the tribe of Dan is absolutely excluded. (Revelations VII, 4-8).
According to the teachings of the Holy Fathers, the devil, exalting the Antichrist, will try to vest his coming with all the signs of the coming of the Son of God to earth. (See St. Cyril of Jerusalem, the 150th catechistic word; St. Ephrem the Syrian, the 39th word, in the Russian translation Blessed Theodore, "A Short Exposition of Divine Dogma", Chapter 23, St. Ippolit, "The Legends of Christ and the Antichrist")
Originally posted by Shawn B.
Since Jews didn't accept Jesus as the messiah does anyone else think the messiah that the Jews will say/think is the messiah, Christians will say is the Anti-Christ? Could the second coming of Jesus and Anti-Christ thing just be there to misdirect people from the real Jewish Messiah?
Originally posted by Shawn B.
Do Jews even keep track of the living bloodline of David now?
You'd think they would since they say the Messiah will come from it.
Originally posted by MurderCityDevil
reply to post by Shawn B.
it lists all 12 tirbes of isreal well excpet daniel's
4 And I heard the number of them which were sealed: and there were sealed an hundred and forty and four thousand of all the tribes of the children of Israel.
5 Of the tribe of Juda were sealed twelve thousand. Of the tribe of Reuben were sealed twelve thousand. Of the tribe of Gad were sealed twelve thousand.
6 Of the tribe of Aser were sealed twelve thousand. Of the tribe of Nephthalim were sealed twelve thousand. Of the tribe of Manasses were sealed twelve thousand.
7 Of the tribe of Simeon were sealed twelve thousand. Of the tribe of Levi were sealed twelve thousand. Of the tribe of Issachar were sealed twelve thousand.
8 Of the tribe of Zabulon were sealed twelve thousand. Of the tribe of Joseph were sealed twelve thousand. Of the tribe of Benjamin were sealed twelve thousand.
Originally posted by Shawn B.
Do Jews even keep track of the living bloodline of David now?
You'd think they would since they say the Messiah will come from it.
[edit on 14-1-2008 by Shawn B.]
Originally posted by Shawn B.
Originally posted by AshleyD
Some think this is how it will happen with the counterfeit Jesus. Or that the corrupt church will merge with Islam to make one big fake religion that everyone is forced to worship or face death.
Well, how do you know both aren't fake religions? Seems like both only got to where they are by massive bloodshed and fear.
Originally posted by Pjotr
Please stop thinking about it and it will disappear and you will be free of it. You all are Christ and Anti-christ and God and whatever.
Originally posted by jdposey
At the same time, I am always mindful of Revelation 20:4
And I saw thrones, and they sat upon them, and judgment was given unto them: and I saw the souls of them that were BEHEADED for the witness of Jesus, and for the word of God, and which had not worshipped the beast, neither his image, neither had received his mark upon their foreheads, or in their hands; and they lived and reigned with Christ a thousand years.
Note BEHEADING and comparing that type of execution to the Muslims.
Jews didn't accept Jesus as the messiah does anyone think the messiah that the Jews will say/think is the messiah, Christians will say is the Anti-Christ? Could the second coming of Jesus and Anti-Christ thing just be there to misdirect people from the real Jewish Messiah?