It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
If true, it would mean that you yourself reading this article are more likely to be some momentary fluctuation in a field of matter and energy out in space than a person with a real past born through billions of years of evolution in an orderly star-spangled cosmos. Your memories and the world you think you see around you are illusions.
Originally posted by slymattb
I dont remember the bible saying what nation the antichrist would come from. I think its possible for him to come from Jews or Islam. I think most likely he will be dark skin
Originally posted by aaaauroraaaaa
Egyptian bloodline goes all the way to the British throne.
Isn't there something in the bible or some prophecy that he will hold the hind hoove or the hind hoove is evil and he will lead his sheeples?
That is the only Published picture of british royalty ever shown holding a sheep. Let alone the hind hoove. Ever. It is not hosted on any USA or British websites that I know of. The linked one is from Australia.
Not to mention When does he turn 30? The year 2012.
[edit on 15-1-2008 by aaaauroraaaaa]
Originally posted by mattguy404
Originally posted by slymattb
I dont remember the bible saying what nation the antichrist would come from. I think its possible for him to come from Jews or Islam. I think most likely he will be dark skin
Right . Why? Because Jews, Muslims and black people are currently labelled as 'bad guys' by a lot of people?
That's ridiculous. We don't need an antichrist when there's religious and racial superiority sprayed around.
Originally posted by MurderCityDevil
egyptian bloodline? do you have all the books of the years of all the family trees?
30 in 2012? what significance is that?
Google Video Link |
Originally posted by MurderCityDevil
reply to post by aaaauroraaaaa
ive seen zeitgeist
how much of that is speculation and how much is fact
just cause someone made a video doesnt mean its truth
Originally posted by runetang
In Daniel it says he will worship the God of Force, a God his Father's did not know. Would anyone like to elaborate their opinion on this line?
POST BY Kacou///
The word Anti –Christ is in fact referring to Anti-Christos, which mean Anti Messiah.
The early Roman Christian church was very cleaver in the sense where in promulgating this kind of dogma they close the door of any future Messiah from any religion. This look like a Machiavellic power of all prediction, therefore only the Christ can return hence the second coming.
Anti-Christ don’t mean Anti-Jesus!
Because Jesus was not refer as Christ when he was teaching.
Kacou.
Post by St Udio///
no...it's my slant on things that the key is the re-established Sanhedrin
doing Political maneuvering who will announce that a certain person
will be deemed a 'peace-maker'
The Jews were allowed to keep their Sanhedrin, their council of high priests and elders of the people; but the power of the Sanhedrin was strictly limited. The Sanhedrin, for example, could not impose the death penalty without the permission of the Roman ruler, to whom belonged the highest authority in Israel.
Forget Royal bloodlines!
Originally posted by jdposey
There is this descritpion in Daniel 11:37-38 in regard to the Anti-Christ:
Neither shall he regard the God of his fathers, nor the desire of women, nor regard any god: for he shall magnify himself above all. 38 But in his estate shall he honour the God of forces: and a god whom his fathers knew not shall he honour with gold, and silver, and with precious stones, and pleasant things.
Originally posted by jdposey
So, we have covered this scripture somewhat. I wonder what everyone's speculation on the wording: ...nor the desire of women... would allude to, and, if that can fit into any certain doctrine of belief, what woud that be?