It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by GT100FV
reply to post by OzWeatherman
Please cite just one example where mutation in a species has been of benefit(the mutation produce a weak offspring which dies off). There has never been a case where the mutation was a positive thing. Natural selection and inherited traits aren't proof of macroevolution.
The offspring are still the same species. There is no evidence of a species evolving into another. The laws of Thermodynamics and entropy show that things do not go from the simple to the complex, but rather the other way around. These are but a few holes in the macroevolution theory.
Originally posted by Austin9599945
Isnt bacterial mutations a positive thing?
they become far more resistent to drugs and then reproduce..continuing the resisitence.
Originally posted by andre18
Ummmmm just wondering…why is this thread still going.. I mean….it’s not like a Christian is going to magically show actually solid scientific evidence that creation is the slightest bit feasible… and so why are you even wasting your time…al they’re going to say….faith….or some other BS….it’s honestly like talking to a brick wall
Originally posted by SilverSmith
Originally posted by Austin9599945
Isnt bacterial mutations a positive thing?
they become far more resistent to drugs and then reproduce..continuing the resisitence.
When was bacteria anything but bacteria? Bacteria can become resistant to something but does this then indicate it has mutated into another species or it is still bacteria? It would be something if that bacteria evolved into a more complex thingy, eh?
Originally posted by SilverSmith
Originally posted by andre18
Ummmmm just wondering…why is this thread still going.. I mean….it’s not like a Christian is going to magically show actually solid scientific evidence that creation is the slightest bit feasible… and so why are you even wasting your time…al they’re going to say….faith….or some other BS….it’s honestly like talking to a brick wall
Your confused. Your presuppositions tell you that there is no God because you deny all things metaphysical. To you there is only "science" and "evidence".
To demonstrate this to you please take note of your statement.
"it's not like a Christian is going to magically show actually solid evidence....."
Why use the word "magically"? It's because you view it as a fable, fantasy and myth. You mock it. This would be your presuppositions. No amount of "evidence" would convince you that God is the Creator. Why? Well because any evidence would be seen by you as having another meaning or explanation, there is nothing other than our physical world to you, thus any and all evidence MUST have a physical or empirical basis.
You're then an empiricist and thus base your knowledge on the (empirical) observation of the world around you yet you cannot tell me how you gain knowledge through observation. Before you scoff at that think deeply upon it. Using only your empirical senses, how do you gain knowledge through observation? How did you come to learn the word "evidence" via empirical means?
In a nutshell, you have no idea what evidence would be for creation because your mind has already stated that any and all evidence MUST be that of evolution. Again your presuppositions will not allow it and to claim you have no presuppositions would then be your presupposition......that you have no presuppositions.
Originally posted by AncientVoid
but why in the world does it always come back to evo?
Originally posted by Fromabove
and the time and place were right for a bolt of lightning to come down and in impossible odds, it hits the pool.
Originally posted by SilverSmith
reply to post by Austin9599945
Thanks for the correction Care to reply in greater detail to that same post?
Now, can you name something that has evolved from one species into another species? I'm not speaking of small changes within a species because I acknowledge that, what I am asking is do we have any testable and repeatable evidence of one species, say a frog, changing into another species, say a bird?
I'm sure you know of the Coelacanth correct? So what's that "evidence" say in regards to millions of years in terms of evolution? Well it could be that evolution stopped for that species or it could be that evolution doesn't work the way most claim or it could be that evolution is wrong.
I already know the answer of most evolutionists. What say you?
Originally posted by melatonin
My opinion is that with such circumstances (billions of galaxies, billions of habitable planets in each, billions of years, billions of simultneous trials) life was pretty much inevitable solely via natural tedencies of chemistry and physics. The same reasons why the universe appears to be teeming with the building blocks even in relatively harsh environments like space.
Moreover, the point with playing with odds is that even if we pull odds out our asses of 1 in 10^-50, there is nothing stopping it happening the first time, and with multiple simultaneous events and long periods, it would be quite likely a few times
Originally posted by Austin9599945
now..as others have said..this topic is getting off topic.
where is the evidence for creationism etc?
I personally dont see any.I would love to believe that when I die some part of me,some feeling,remembering part of me will continue on...but I find no evidence that suggests this is more than wishful thinking.
there are THOUSANDS of confident religions...they cant all be right.In fact,they all could be wrong.
when we kill a god out of history and theology(like old greek gods)we sure find a quick way to create new gods.
odd right?
I find the christiant god to be rather cruel.
Originally posted by SilverSmith
Originally posted by Austin9599945
now..as others have said..this topic is getting off topic.
where is the evidence for creationism etc?
I personally dont see any.I would love to believe that when I die some part of me,some feeling,remembering part of me will continue on...but I find no evidence that suggests this is more than wishful thinking.
there are THOUSANDS of confident religions...they cant all be right.In fact,they all could be wrong.
when we kill a god out of history and theology(like old greek gods)we sure find a quick way to create new gods.
odd right?
I find the christiant god to be rather cruel.
I am arguing for creationism yet I am not doing so based on "evidence", at least not empirical at the moment.
You personally don't see any evidence because, once again, your presuppositions will not allow you to believe. What evidence are you seeking? Do you even know what to look for?
You use the word "evidence" but what does that mean to you? You're an empiricist so using empirical means how did you come to even know the word "evidence" and what it means? Were you able to touch it and know what it meant? Did you smell the word and grasp it, did you see the word and then understand it, did you taste the word and then comprehend it or did you perhaps hear the word and then realize what it meant?
The obvious answer is, "I learned it in school, duh!" That though is not what I'm seeking. Based on your empirical world view, how do you gain knowledge?
You are correct in not all religions or world views can be correct for Truth is absolute. Truth cannot be relative for to deny Truth is Absolute is to confirm it. Truth is never all inclusive but rather exclusive. To argue that truth is relative and everyone should believe that is to then make "relative truth" an absolute belief for everyone. Thus relativism crumbles into skepticism and skepticism cannot stand for one who is a skeptic would have to then be skeptical of being a skeptic. So *IF* Truth be Absolute, where did it come from?
You claim that God may just be another created myth. I would ask you to think deeply upon this then. Why would man create such a God as the one found within Scripture? Why a God that demands perfection from His creation, why such a Holy and Righteous God? Also, please create for me a God greater that the one revealed in Scripture.
Thanks
Originally posted by SilverSmith
Originally posted by Austin9599945
now..as others have said..this topic is getting off topic.
where is the evidence for creationism etc?
I personally dont see any.I would love to believe that when I die some part of me,some feeling,remembering part of me will continue on...but I find no evidence that suggests this is more than wishful thinking.
there are THOUSANDS of confident religions...they cant all be right.In fact,they all could be wrong.
when we kill a god out of history and theology(like old greek gods)we sure find a quick way to create new gods.
odd right?
I find the christiant god to be rather cruel.
I am arguing for creationism yet I am not doing so based on "evidence", at least not empirical at the moment.
You personally don't see any evidence because, once again, your presuppositions will not allow you to believe. What evidence are you seeking? Do you even know what to look for?
You use the word "evidence" but what does that mean to you? You're an empiricist so using empirical means how did you come to even know the word "evidence" and what it means? Were you able to touch it and know what it meant? Did you smell the word and grasp it, did you see the word and then understand it, did you taste the word and then comprehend it or did you perhaps hear the word and then realize what it meant?
The obvious answer is, "I learned it in school, duh!" That though is not what I'm seeking. Based on your empirical world view, how do you gain knowledge?
You are correct in not all religions or world views can be correct for Truth is absolute. Truth cannot be relative for to deny Truth is Absolute is to confirm it. Truth is never all inclusive but rather exclusive. To argue that truth is relative and everyone should believe that is to then make "relative truth" an absolute belief for everyone. Thus relativism crumbles into skepticism and skepticism cannot stand for one who is a skeptic would have to then be skeptical of being a skeptic. So *IF* Truth be Absolute, where did it come from?
You claim that God may just be another created myth. I would ask you to think deeply upon this then. Why would man create such a God as the one found within Scripture? Why a God that demands perfection from His creation, why such a Holy and Righteous God? Also, please create for me a God greater that the one revealed in Scripture.
Thanks
Originally posted by SilverSmith
reply to post by Austin9599945
Again you skirted my post and questions. There is a starting point in all things, even arguments, yet when one party continues to open more rabbit trails and avoids that starting point then no one gets anywhere.