Originally posted by Griff
Could it be that the towers were built sub-par? Could that be the conspiracy all along?
You know that got me thinking I had heard this before (they used cheap and dodgy materials to build the towers) and that was actually my first thought
on 9/11 when I watched the towers collapsed. It was like, ghee thoughts buildings must of been made out of plasterboard or something! No wonder it
collapsed in a big ball of powder, what's all the fuss about? What did you expect? America should be ashamed that it collapsed! It was almost
embarrassing, like what do you expect when you build these things out of plasterboard and cheap synthetics!
But I certainly did not realise they were supposed to have steel outer walls and steel core, and I also did not realise how damn huge these things
were! On TV you don't really get much idea of the scale, especially with the Manhattan skyline and neighbouring large structures. I never realised
these were two of the largest buildings in the world! I was shocked. I just assumed they were a bunch of very cheap concrete and plasterboard office
blocks or something.
I think that's what really got me mad about this whole thing when I began to learn more about the size and structure of these buildings (or alleged
structure) the huge amounts of steel contained in the cores and outer walls then knowing how much work and how long demolition takes and what would be
involved is almost incomprehensible. Demolition record breaking literally. The towers were steel giants, two of the biggest on Earth!
Anyway getting back to the point think about this. Up to about the 80th floor it was all moderate quality steel but the last 30 floors, since they
were on top and not having to support the additional load could be lighter weight materials, cheaper and synthetic. Almost like the top 30 stories
were like a separate Las Vegas style building with the real strong steel 80 stories below carrying all the load.
Also when you watch the collapse, its like the top 30 floors drop into the 80th floor than the rest comes down. I brought this point up before when I
noticed this but never thought the materials could also be different, its almost like the top 30 floors were a separate demolition of a different
building. If you took those top 30 floors down to ground level and ignore the rest it would of looked like an implosion from the bottom, if you get
me. Just like WTC7. That was just over 40 floors tho.
So basically what I am saying is it looks to me like they took out the top 30 floors like a separate building as if it were at ground level - then
imploded the rest, sort of like a double demolition. Perhaps this would also explain the tipping phenomena on the south tower collapse and how it
seemed to just vanish, because all the materials were so much lighter and weaker and were indeed something other than steel, it would also explain how
the plane could enter the building so easily and why I think that perhaps just the impact zones were sabotaged when infact it was everything above
floor 80 was cheap synthetic materials or substitutions.
Still it was reported they found tiny specks of steel in the dust clouds and that can't really be ignored, that's basically admitting that even the
steel was reduced to powder. I think that points heavily at the usage of a WMD (and I am not talking about a boeing or jet fuel).
Well it something to think about, and it's more realistic than holoplanes! Perhaps worth investigating further too.
[edit on 7-2-2008 by Insolubrious]