For a black hole of one solar mass (about 2 × 10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000kg), we get an evaporation time of
100,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 years—much longer than the current age of the
universe.
en.wikipedia.org...
(I filled in the actual zero's for effect_
Well well well... what do we have here???
What the heck am I doing looking up 'Hawking radiation' first thing in the morning you may well ask.. SAD!!!
But.. assuming Stephen Hawking to be cleverer than most and his theory of black holes to be correct.. then all we have to do is find a black hole
larger than one solar mass to prove the big bang.. and the age of the universe wrong..
To simplify the point in question(simple enough for me so please don't shoot it down)
'virtual photons' are broken down on the event horizon into two particles.. one + which escapes and one - which gets sucked into the black hole
DECREASING the mass of said black hole faster than the expansion due to matter it sucks in..
(This must be why they don't continue to expand and swallow everything locally.)
In calculating the 'shrink time' applied to this theory.. any black hole the size of our sun would be(as said in the above quote) OLDER than the
universe(AND therefore the BIG BANG)..
Any one else's brain starting to hurt?
Hehe glad I could help to disturb anyone into this stuff
[edit on 11-1-2008 by AGENT_T]