It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Haroki
Nothing but what was found in that pile is sufficient to turn metal molten.
Originally posted by Freelancer
Agreed. But unless any of the posters to this thread was able to obtain a sample of this molten liquid for further analysis or, show verifiable evidence from an outside source to the chemical make-up of this liquid any views or opinions expressed would be speculative at best.
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
Originally posted by Freelancer
Agreed. But unless any of the posters to this thread was able to obtain a sample of this molten liquid for further analysis or, show verifiable evidence from an outside source to the chemical make-up of this liquid any views or opinions expressed would be speculative at best.
Yes, FEMA was the only agency to do a testing of the steel.
NIST did not test for any explosives or chemicels
Originally posted by Disclosed
The NIST did in fact perform tests on the steel. The report is here:
wtc.nist.gov...
12. Did the NIST investigation look for evidence of the WTC towers being brought down by controlled demolition? Was the steel tested for explosives or thermite residues? The combination of thermite and sulfur (called thermate) "slices through steel like a hot knife through butter."
NIST did not test for the residue of these compounds in the steel.
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
So i will repeat my post again. You do agree that something else had to casue the heat the melted the steel and kept it molten for 6 weeks?
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
Originally posted by Disclosed
The NIST did in fact perform tests on the steel. The report is here:
wtc.nist.gov...
Thats funny because in this report they stated they did no testing for explosives or thermite.
wtc.nist.gov...
12. Did the NIST investigation look for evidence of the WTC towers being brought down by controlled demolition? Was the steel tested for explosives or thermite residues? The combination of thermite and sulfur (called thermate) "slices through steel like a hot knife through butter."
NIST did not test for the residue of these compounds in the steel.
NIST World Trade Center Investigation Team
100 Bureau Drive, Stop 8610
Gaithersburg, MD 20899-8610
Phone: (301) 975-6051
Fax: (301) 975-6122
Email: [email protected]
Originally posted by Pilgrum
It's also notable that this phenomenon was most evident under WTC2 but not WTC1 so would this suggest that they collapsed via different mechanisms?
Quick, but safe decisions regarding where to put the cranes had to be made, inspection of the slurry wall and water in the basement were conducted, while numerous fires were still burning and smoldering. Underground it was still so hot that molten metal dripped down the sides of the wall from Building 6. Cars - both burned and pristine - were suspended in the air balanced on cracked parking garage slabs.
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
Thats funny because in this report they stated they did no testing for explosives or thermite.
Originally posted by Disclosed
NIST did extensive tests on the steel. Just because they didnt test for your precious thermite does not mean they didnt do ANY tests on the steel.
Originally posted by totallyhuman
I have worked with C4 and dynomite and can tell you that the WTC buildings were man-demolished not fuel demolished.
Originally posted by Disclosed
Are you reading what you are posting?
FEMA was not the only agency that did tests on the steel. Why did you say that? I linked the NIST report showing their steel tests.
Originally posted by Disclosed
That IS what this post is discussing, isnt it? Jet fuel?
Originally posted by Disclosed
The subject is "Jet fuel made the WTC fires cooler". I didnt see explosives or chemicals listed in the original posters request.
NIST dismisses the possibility that jet fuel played a sustained role in the fires. “While much of the public attention has been focused on the jet fuel, most of this was combusted in only a few minutes.” (NCSTAR 1-5 p50, para3)