It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
Originally posted by Zaphod58
The floors below were designed to support them with SMALL movements, like from them rocking in the wind.
Well actually they were designed to support rather large movements from the wind.
A surviver from the 78th floor of the North tower stated the tower moved several feet when the plane hit but came back into postion just like it does in high winds.
Originally posted by Haroki
Actually, the quote from the survivor is that the tower swayed 20 ft, which is of course ridiculous.
NIST estimated, by looking at videos and measuring the movement, that it swayed 20 inches.
Originally posted by Zaphod58
And how does that person know that it was 20 feet?
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
Well i tend to think a person that is blind has a better feel for things that happen then a sighted person.
Originally posted by Zaphod58
And I would think that a person who has never felt the building sway like that before, and was in a total panic over what happened would have THOUGHT it was worse than it really was. ?
Originally posted by defcon5
Actually to a blind person it would feel worse then it was.
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
Originally posted by Zaphod58
Do you understand the difference between static and kinetic?
So even with the floors moving the floors below should have held the extra weight.
[edit on 8-12-2007 by ULTIMA1]
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
Originally posted by Zaphod5
The floors below were designed to support them with SMALL movements, like from them rocking in the wind.
Well actually they were designed to support rather large movements from the wind.
A surviver from the 78th floor of the North tower stated the tower moved several feet when the plane hit but came back into postion just like it does in high winds.
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
Originally posted by Haroki
Actually, the quote from the survivor is that the tower swayed 20 ft, which is of course ridiculous.
NIST estimated, by looking at videos and measuring the movement, that it swayed 20 inches.
I would rather believe the person that was actually there then NIST who was not there.
The building had expansion joints to be able to move a lot in the high winds.
[edit on 8-12-2007 by ULTIMA1]
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
Originally posted by Zaphod58
And how does that person know that it was 20 feet?
Well i tend to think a person that is blind has a better feel for things that happen then a sighted person.
He stated that him and a co-worker thought that the building was going to fall over before it stopped and righted itself.
Originally posted by Zaphod58
You think that someone is going to feel the building sway (supposedly) TWENTY FEET and is not going to panic, even a little? Oh right, you're also the one that said that the Flight 93 pilots should have responded instantly to the warning to secure the cockpit and CERTAINLY wouldn't have sat there in shock for a minute or two.
Originally posted by Disclosed
Sounds like a lot of sway caused by your fragile aluminum plane. Could it be that it had more force than you are saying, then?
Originally posted by Zaphod58
Do you have any idea how little sense that makes? "The plane hit with very little force, but since it has expansion joints it moved 20 feet."
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
Sounds like a lot of sway caused by your fragile aluminum plane. Could it be that it had more force than you are saying, then? [/quote
No, as i have shown with a number of reports and as stated by the surviver, the building was designed with expansion joints to move.
Please read post and do research before posting about something that has already been proven by facts and evidence.
[edit on 8-12-2007 by ULTIMA1]
Right there he asks if the planes could have hit with more force than you are saying, and you say "no". How is that misunderstanding you????
[edit on 12/8/2007 by Zaphod58]
Originally posted by Zaphod58
Right there he asks if the planes could have hit with more force than you are saying, and you say "no". How is that misunderstanding you????
Originally posted by Pilgrum
We've seen the photographic evidence of fractured steel columns, gaping aircraft sized hole, .