It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Zaphod58
Originally posted by dead steve
Here is a silly question.
What is stopping some one from grabbing a chunk of Ram coating and mailing it to some other country?
Dead Steve
Even if they did, from what I've heard, it's almost impossible to reverse engineer it. That was one of the things brought up with the F-117 that was shot down. They can see what it does, but it's incredibly difficult if not impossible to reverse engineer. One of the nasty things about RAM, at least the early stuff, was that if you had a relatively minor problem, like an engine fire (and I mean minor in the sense that most planes turn off the engine, fire goes out), in the F-117 the RAM would catch fire, and once that went up, you weren't getting it out short of landing and having specialized fire fighting equipment used on it.
Originally posted by ShatteredSkies
The YF-23(Never designated F-23) and YF-22 were exclusively part of the ATF competition between Northrop and Lockheed Martin. The YF-22 won out for many reasons, the YF-22 was the better "Master of none" aircraft, meaning all around it was the better choice, due to political, economical, and also the performance of the craft.
Shattered OUT...
Originally posted by ghost
Originally posted by ShatteredSkies
The YF-23(Never designated F-23) and YF-22 were exclusively part of the ATF competition between Northrop and Lockheed Martin. The YF-22 won out for many reasons, the YF-22 was the better "Master of none" aircraft, meaning all around it was the better choice, due to political, economical, and also the performance of the craft.
Shattered OUT...
ShatteredSkies,
Sorry, but I think you picked up the Political Disinformation! What you just summed up was the "Official Reason" why the F-22 won. I rank this story right up there with the old "There is NO Area 51" BS the government threw at people. Preformance had Nothing to do with it. The YF-23 was Nearly equal in agility to the YF-22( which only had a slight edge at high-alpha in the post stall range). The YF-23 was also Faster, Steathier,had a higher ceiling, higher payload and better range.
As for economic, the F-22 was cheeper them the F-23, but then again the F-15 is cheeper then the F-22. What's your point?
My instincts tell me that Someone got PAID OFF to take the F-22 over the F-23. Politics was the deciding factor. I think it's strange that General Dynamics (who was on the F-22 team) got accused of fraud on another contract around the time the F-22 won. A-12 anyone?
Tim
Originally posted by WestPoint23
That picture says C. 2004, so I assume it's from 2004? And the YF-23 used F-119 engines without the TVC right. They never did develop the F-120 for the test model.
Originally posted by indian_sukhoi
This is How it Looks now.