It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by eyewitness86
ONE hole, not two..but TWO big 6 tons each engines..strange huh? NO wings broken off outside from hitting the biulding: The story is that they somehow ' followed ' the plane into the 10X12 foot opening!!! And some people actually believe this stuff!! Unreal. The witnesses have NOT confirmed the official story; on the contrary, as Craig Renke has shown here on ATS, witnesses say totally different things and have different perceptions based on many factors..often eyewitnesses are the worst evidence to rely on: just ask the men released from death row lately after DNA proved them innocent: They were ALL there because of a POSITIVE eyewitness!! A witness who was WRONG!!
There is MASSIVE evidence of NO plane at the Pentagon, and NO evidence presented so far that proves it. Just the fact that the FBO will not release the many videos it has of the event tells it all: The big shots believe that it is in the ' interest of national security ' that the people not know that a group of insiders pulled 9-11 off for their own agendas, using their official positions to commit murder and treason...they think it would unravel our nation and cause a scandal that we could not recover from..they cover it up, just like Kennedy..just like B. Kennedy..just like...
Originally posted by simnut
Let's go over a couple of things here.
First of all , show me proof that it was only a 10x12 entrance hole. Most photos and details brought forward show a hole up to 30-35 feet. There was a 10x12 hole in the pentagon, the so called "punched out hole", three rings in. Oh, by the way, what would have created that "punched hole" ?
Originally posted by jthomas
What many 9/11 conspiracy theorists forget is the number of people who would know that the government was lying about what happened after the fact IF 9/11 was an inside job and the government was trying to cover it up.
Originally posted by jthomas
Originally posted by OrionStars
Originally posted by jthomas
I find it interesting that people are still claiming AA 77 did not hit the Pentagon. The claim is based entirely on the notion that the government wants us to believe a 757 hit it but in reality something "else" supposedly hit it, like a missile.
Then perhaps you will consider reading Dr. Peter Tiradera's book 9-11 Coup against America! The Pentagon Analysis
Actually, that doesn't address my post.
Actually, it does if you read the book. It explains and substantiates why a 757 did not hit the Pentagon. Dr. Tiradera is an ex-USAF officer, whose job duties entailed investigating military jet crashes. As a physician, it served well in forensic examination of bodies and remains as well. He was also involved in forensically examining the debris of crashed aircraft. In other words, he is credible experienced professional expert substantiating what he wrote in his book.
Did you expect laypersons in forums to be able to explain, or even fully substantiate, what takes expertise from an experienced field hands-on professional or career technician?
[edit on 16-12-2007 by OrionStars]
Originally posted by eyewitness86
Not a single one? Please go to : Patriotsquestion911.com site and read the list of military, professional and others who DO make a point about it!! There are some there who were at the Pentagon that day and KNOW that there was no plane there..if you have not seen that site you really have not seen the major list of people in the know who want some real answers.
You will be suprised at who you see there, like the former FBI director and others like that, Generals, etc. Go read the names and see what they say and then come back. Thanks.
"Following a cool-down of the resulting fire, this crash site would have been very easy to collect enough time-change equipment within 15 minutes to positively identify the aircraft registry." (Who says? What is his evidence for that claim?)
"If an aluminum Boeing 757 had struck that fortified building, there would have been more aluminum on the ground outside than what went inside." (According to whom or on what data? This is just a claim, not evidence.)
"CNN Pentagon correspondent Jamie McIntyre reported from the Pentagon on September 11th: "From my close-up inspection, there is no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the Pentagon." (McIntyre refuted this claim long ago. Why is it still posted?)
"It was only later when pictures emerged showing the inappropriate damage to the Pentagon - reported to have been caused by a large aircraft crashing through several layers of external wall - that professional doubt was aroused in my mind." (What is 'inappropriate' damage? Where is his evidence?)
"Why was there no evidence of a passenger jet debris at the Pentagon crash site? " (There was - inside and outside.)
"There was a dearth of visible debris on the relatively unmarked [Pentagon] lawn, where I stood only minutes after the impact. Beyond this strange absence of airliner debris, there was no sign of the kind of damage to the Pentagon structure one would expect from the impact of a large airliner. " (Tell us what 'one should expect.' Again, an opinion, a claim, nothing more.)
"And when you look at the damage, it was obviously a missile." (Yet this person never saw the wreckage and makes a claim on what he thinks he 'should have' seen.)
Originally posted by OrionStars
Originally posted by jthomas
What many 9/11 conspiracy theorists forget is the number of people who would know that the government was lying about what happened after the fact IF 9/11 was an inside job and the government was trying to cover it up.
What some people may not be aware of is that low to high level conspiracies go on all the time, and have throughout recorded history - many quite successfully for years. Eventually, there are those that are exposed.
Any time two or more people are involved in secret activities, that is a true conspiracy. Every secret society is a conspiracy.
Well, unless the fuselage circumference of a 757 is less than 30-35', the "official" verision already has a severe problem. Then there are wings and tail fins attached to a 757.
Originally posted by OrionStars
Actually, it does if you read the book. It explains and substantiates why a 757 did not hit the Pentagon. Dr. Tiradera is an ex-USAF officer, whose job duties entailed investigating military jet crashes. As a physician, it served well in forensic examination of bodies and remains as well. He was also involved in forensically examining the debris of crashed aircraft. In other words, he is credible experienced professional expert substantiating what he wrote in his book.
"Notice that there is no impact gouge or turf damage to the Pentalawn from any aircraft part. They just floated down like feathers, right?"
911exposed.org...
"Why is this part from the landing gear so heavy rusted? Other than the rust it has no other damage what so ever — there is no: scratches, gouges, deformation, or broken pieces. Notice the polished protrusion on the left, completely unscratched, and free of rust. It appears that this piece had been sitting in an outdoor scrap yard for some time. The protrusion was inside a fitting and therefore never was exposed to moisture, thus keeping its natural smooth finish. This part was not from any plane that hit the Pentagon. "
# Flight 77 was not a scheduled flight and interestingly was filled with an assortment of high-tech defense-contractor employees.
# Flight 77 was ten minutes late — this accounts for the reason that the 9/11 Commission had to change the time of attack.
# Flight 77 never went off course.
Did you expect laypersons in forums to be able to explain, or even fully substantiate, what takes expertise from an experienced field hands-on professional or career technician?
Originally posted by eyewitness86
What a bunch of nonsense!! As if NO evidence equals evidence..this is getting aggravating. WHERE are the parts being hauled out of the Pentagon? Where are the supposed 1000 people who claim to have seen the engines and luggage? Where are they? Where are the photographs they took? The fact that they do not exist means nothing to some people; some folks would rather believe in the most outlandish garbage rather than plain logic.
The first newsman, Jamie McIntyre, says that there are no plane parts there and no evidence of a plane crashing there....and some call this NOT real facts?
America Under Attack: Bush Holds Press Briefing
Aired September 11, 2001 - 14:20 ET
Outside the Pentagon, CNN's military affairs correspondent Jamie McIntyre.
And, Jamie, you got very close to where that plane went down.
JAMIE MCINTYRE, CNN CORRESPONDENT: That's right, Judy.
A short -- a while ago I walked right up next to the building, firefighters were still trying to put the blaze. The fire, by the way, is still burning in some parts of the Pentagon. And I took a look at the huge gaping hole that's in the side of the Pentagon in an area of the Pentagon that has been recently renovated, part of a multibillion dollar renovation program here at the Pentagon. I could see parts of the airplane that crashed into the building, very small pieces of the plane on the heliport outside the building. The biggest piece I saw was about three feet long, it was silver and had been painted green and red, but I could not see any identifying markings on the plane. I also saw a large piece of shattered glass. It appeared to be a cockpit windshield or other window from the plane.
...
WOODRUFF: Jamie, Aaron was talking earlier -- or one of our correspondence was talking earlier -- I think -- actually, it was Bob Franken -- with an eyewitness who said it appeared that that Boeing 757, the American jet, American Airline jet, landed short of the Pentagon.
Can you give us any better idea of how much of the plane actually impacted the building?
MCINTYRE: You know, it might have appeared that way, but from my close-up inspection, there's no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the Pentagon. The only site is the actual site of the building that's crashed in, and as I said, the only pieces left that you can see are small enough that you can pick up in your hand. There are no large tail sections, wing sections, fuselage, nothing like that anywhere around, which would indicate that the entire plane crashed into the side of the Pentagon and then caused the side to collapse.
transcripts.cnn.com...
Try 2.3 trillion that the Pentacon have lost in 2001 ALONE and dont know where it is.
According to law enforcement officials and press reports, the 19 suspected terrorists received flight training from at least 10 U.S. flight schools.
apologies. Poorly trained as pilots.
originally posted by: cardinalfan0596
Where do you get the idea that they were "poorly trained" at ?