If 9/11 was a inside job, How many people were involved?, page 1
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 3 times


reply posted on 13-10-2007 @ 07:35 AM by 11Bravo
reply to post by NoOneSpecialHere



Ask yourself how many people it took to cover up the attack on the USS Liberty.

Research that and you will have your answer.


reply posted on 13-10-2007 @ 08:04 AM by vladmir
Well have a peek at 'Hitler and the Reichstag Fire' while you are at it.
How Hitler became a Dictator is the name of the article.
www.fff.org...

Check this out too.
home.comcast.net...

You see, this is what i am saying.
Do yourself a favour, and research how government-sponsored-terrorism is used as a pretext to enslave their own populations, throughout history.

After all,its all out in the open.


[edit on 13-10-2007 by vladmir]


reply posted on 13-10-2007 @ 03:29 PM by malcolmdelaney
reply to post by seanm



Your opening statement is totally inaccurate. Several 9/11 truthers including Webster Tarpley and David Ray Griffin have addressed this exact question. The idea that it would take thousand of know participants simply isn't true. All that would be needed would be a handful of knowing partipants in key places.


reply posted on 13-10-2007 @ 05:50 PM by seanm
Originally posted by malcolmdelaney
reply to
post by seanm



Your opening statement is totally inaccurate. Several 9/11 truthers including Webster Tarpley and David Ray Griffin have addressed this exact question. The idea that it would take thousand of know participants simply isn't true. All that would be needed would be a handful of knowing partipants in key places.


You all need to read more carefully. You don't even have to address those who might be in on a conspiracy. You forgot the hundreds, if not thousands, of people who have direct knowledge of events AFTER AA11 hit WTC 1 until today, who would necessarily know if something did or did not happen on 9/11. No one, including the government, would have any prior knowledge of who those people were and no post-event knowledge either - unless those people spoke up. None of those people who knew events were different than what was being represented by anyone would have any compelling reason not to speak up.

What you want us to believe, for instance, is that if any of us witnessed anything OTHER than AA77 hitting the Pentagon, we would not say so. Why wouldn't we? If we told no one, no one would know that we knew AA77 did not hit the Pentagon. Who or what would compel us to say nothing? No one, of course. The government wouldn't know who we were so we couldn't be threatened. Nor do we have any reason to think we would not be able to speak freely.

For the same reason, 9/11 Truthers - Craig Ranke, JP, Ultima 1 - being prime examples so far on this forum - want us to believe that hundreds of firemen, rescue and wreckage recovery workers who had direct access to the Pentagon, were inside it, and recovered the bodies and wreckage, either do not exist or would never say what they saw and recovered. Not even one of them.

You want us to believe that these hundreds of key people with direct knowledge would not, under ANY circumstances, want to blow the case wide open just as you think you are doing here! Not even one of them!

It should be no surprise that no 9/11 Truther has ever addressed such obvious facts as who would know definitively what actually transpired and would know if we were being lied to - and would have no reason not to come forth.

That is just another reason the 9/11 Truth Movement became the 9/11 Denial Movement 5 whole years ago. You all just refuse to question your own beliefs.













[edit on 13-10-2007 by seanm]

[edit on 13-10-2007 by seanm]


reply posted on 13-10-2007 @ 06:42 PM by Leo Strauss
reply to post by NoOneSpecialHere



What you are failing to acknowledge is the range of possible explanations.

It has been confirmed beyond reasonable doubt that there was foreknowledge of the events including specific intelligence warnings from multiple sources regarding the type and timing of the attacks. Therefore at a minimum there is the Let It Happen on Purpose (LIHOP) theory of 9/11.
This explanation would only require a few with insider knowledge.

There are many examples throughout history of sucessful conspiracies.

Have you looked at Operation Northwoods. When you consider the Joint Chiefs signed off on this plan and presented it to President Kennedy I would say it would force you to at least consider the possibility of an Inside Job on 911.

A few others:
CIA overthrow of Mossadegh in Iran in 53.
Secret bombing of Cambodia during the Vietnam War.
Gulf of Tonkin
Pearl Harbor
USS Liberty
Reichstag Fire
The Battleship Maine
The Lusitania

The list goes on and on throughout history.

So I think what many people are calling for is an independant investigation of 911. There are far too many inconsistencies, deceptions
and irregularities with the events of that day and the official explanation.

Also, as stated above, the official story is that 19 hijackers pulled off the entire operation...now you are telling us it would take thousands!! Don't you see how that fact could undermine your theory??
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



Flight 93 was headed for Building 7
  Posted 10 days ago with 48 member flags
9/11 INTERCEPTED
  Posted 2 days ago with 45 member flags
9/11: The WTC Elevator Key
  Posted 13 days ago with 43 member flags
What are your favorite 9/11 debunking tactics?
  Posted 6 days ago with 17 member flags
Who is the Joker on ATS radio now running their mouth?
  Posted 14 days ago with 13 member flags
Was the government a co-conspirator?
  Posted 16 days ago with 9 member flags
British Police Want Us To Present False Flag Terror Evidence.
  Posted 6 days ago with 8 member flags