 |
|
Topic started on 5-10-2007 @ 10:10 PM by SmokeyJo
|
Israel may have tricked Syria radars to hide raid
www.news.com.au
 ISRAELI fighter planes may have managed to escape detection by Syrian radars during their September 6 raid by forcing the detection system to
make a mistake, Aviation Week magazine reported.
(visit the link for the full news article)
[edit on 6/10/2007 by Mirthful Me]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 5-10-2007 @ 10:10 PM by SmokeyJo
|
Wow, so they can take over as systems administrator.?? Doesnt this mean they have access to the network. Thats exactly what it means, this also means
they must have somebody on the inside.
I seriously dont believe this report. Just the Article headline is off putting "Israel may have tricked Syria radars to hide raid"
www.news.com.au
(visit the link for the full news article)
[edit on 6/10/2007 by Mirthful Me]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 5-10-2007 @ 10:12 PM by uberarcanist
|
With every week that goes by, Israel tries to find another way to use this story (however true or false it may be) to make their military "penis"
look larger.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 5-10-2007 @ 10:17 PM by SmokeyJo
|
Originally posted by uberarcanist
With every week that goes by, Israel tries to find another way to use this story (however true or false it may be) to make their military "penis"
look larger. 
Have the Syrians even acknowledged the raid/bombing/fuel tank drop/munitions firing/assassination of NK engineers.
Any of the above
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 5-10-2007 @ 10:19 PM by uberarcanist
|
reply to post by SmokeyJo
I just want to know where the independently verifiable proof that any of this happened is. All too many are simply taking Israel at its (historically
very tarnished) word.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 6-10-2007 @ 12:06 AM by Project_Silo
|
Originally posted by SmokeyJo
Originally posted by uberarcanist
With every week that goes by, Israel tries to find another way to use this story (however true or false it may be) to make their military "penis"
look larger. 
Have the Syrians even acknowledged the raid/bombing/fuel tank drop/munitions firing/assassination of NK engineers.
Any of the above 
Yes the Syrians acknowledge the strike,except they are saying it was on a military building under contruction and it had no nuclear materials or
N.Koreans in it.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 6-10-2007 @ 12:13 AM by BitRaiser
|
Link/Source?
This is the breaking news section... you need to show your sources.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 6-10-2007 @ 12:17 AM by Fuggle
|
If this report were true, wouldn't Uncle Russia be TO'd? And maybe patch the exploit?
If, indeed, they exploited a bug or wrote a wallhack, certainly it'd be to the Israeli's disadvantage to take screenshots of it (so to speak).
Frick
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 6-10-2007 @ 12:27 AM by section8citizen
|
I'd like to know the source of the things quoted by the OP. Where is any of this being reported?
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 6-10-2007 @ 12:39 AM by Xfile
|
the heros of entebbe .destroyers of iraq nuke facility etc,etc.only the goose stepping anti semites here at ats would doudt this story.im sure the idf
would crush your lame ass countries air defenses as easily as their arab enemies,lol.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 6-10-2007 @ 12:46 AM by BitRaiser
|
I tried some searches on this, but have so far come up empty.
Again, need sources 'n links!!
reply to post by Xfile
Wha de hull wazzat?
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 6-10-2007 @ 12:49 AM by Beachcoma
|
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 6-10-2007 @ 12:53 AM by section8citizen
|
reply to post by Xfile
Just say no!!
I have not seen anyone doubt the story, I have only seen people (myself included) ask for a source. I'm sorry but I do not believe anything I read
just cause it is posted. Since when did wanting to do research and validate a claim become antisemic?
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 6-10-2007 @ 12:57 AM by Mirthful Me
|
Just a minor...
Formatting error by the OP... It's corrected so let's focus on the topic at hand.
Thanks.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 6-10-2007 @ 01:09 AM by Beachcoma
|
 
Digging deeper I found the source from Aviation Week.
Why Syria's Air Defenses Failed to Detect
Israelis
 The big mystery of the strike is how did the non-stealthy F-15s and F-16s get through the Syrian air defense radars without being detected? Some
U.S. officials say they have the answer.
U.S. aerospace industry and retired military officials indicated today that a technology like the U.S.-developed “Suter” airborne network attack
system developed by BAE Systems and integrated into U.S. unmanned aircraft by L-3 Communications was used by the Israelis. The system has been used or
at least tested operationally in Iraq and Afghanistan over the last year.
The technology allows users to invade communications networks, see what enemy sensors see and even take over as systems administrator so sensors can
be manipulated into positions so that approaching aircraft can’t be seen, they say. The process involves locating enemy emitters with great
precision and then directing data streams into them that can include false targets and misleading messages algorithms that allow a number of
activities including control.
Also a reminder to all, the above is a blog entry, not to be confused with an actual report... but that is not to say it can't be true.
Heh. Hacking into the system. The next generation of warfare better damn well have a hacker unit. So next time you hear reports about Chinese hackers
and what nots... no double standards, please.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 6-10-2007 @ 03:05 AM by SmokeyJo
|
Originally posted by BitRaiser
Link/Source?
This is the breaking news section... you need to show your sources. 
ewww sorry, my bad. But yes, Mirthful's link is the same source..
Thanks for the edit also Mirthful
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 6-10-2007 @ 03:09 AM by jpm1602
|
Regardless of the actual methods employed, it must have been very heavy for the lack of dialogue and secrecy on the event.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 6-10-2007 @ 05:07 AM by bodrul
|
Originally posted by Xfile
the heros of entebbe .destroyers of iraq nuke facility etc,etc.only the goose stepping anti semites here at ats would doudt this story.im sure
the idf would crush your lame ass countries air defenses as easily as their arab enemies,lol. 
could you explain why saying anything against the state of israel is anti semites? shouldnt it also be anti islamic as a 1/5 are muslim
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 6-10-2007 @ 06:09 AM by Duby78
|
Well, if Syria's air defense network is run on MS Windows, everything is possible... especially if they use the Explorer  
If such system actually exists and is capable as stated, then why to buy new expensive aircraft, such as F-22 or B-2? Bring in old good Phantoms,
Intruders etc. Hell, maybe a couple of Spitfires, too
There is also an interesting possibility I've read on one forum - the strike might have been commenced by the US, using B-2 or stuff like that, and
Israel taking the 'credit'.
But really, we really have so little actual info on this event. Both sides are pretty silent, and that is VERY strange. Makes you wonder...
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 6-10-2007 @ 05:52 PM by Kacen
|
Well, perhaps because Israel is a country founded on Judaism for the Jewish people? And it is the -only- Jewish country in the world?
I know that being anti-Zionist does not equal anti-semitic as there are anti-Zionist Jews I am just stating the logic other people use and how it can
be perceived.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |