It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by GradyPhilpott
Don't be surprised if the Corps is still using the Osprey in 2045.
Originally posted by PopeyeFAFL
Like the old Seaking that the Canadian Army is still using.
Originally posted by Canada_EH
That on top of your pointless statement about V-22 numbers being ridiculously low in 50 yrs to the point of 3 airframes sorta puts doubts about how seriously your statement can be taken.
Originally posted by PopeyeFAFL
Originally posted by Canada_EH
That on top of your pointless statement about V-22 numbers being ridiculously low in 50 yrs to the point of 3 airframes sorta puts doubts about how seriously your statement can be taken.
If you have no sense of humour, you got a bigger problem, then I do...
The lack of ability to autorotate to a safe landing is also going to be a serious problem with the V-22. If power is lost below 1600 ft. while in helicopter mode the most likely outcome is a fatal crash.
Originally posted by iskander
Does Osprey even have enough wing lift to belly land with 50% or o power? How will the props be sheered of, automatically, (explosive mounts like on LA-50/52) or will they just tear the crap out of the entire craft?
There are eight exits points in the V-22. In addition to the crew door and the hydraulically activated ramp there are three pyrotechnically released panels in the cabin. There is also a manually released maintenance access hatch located overhead in the aft fuselage which also serves as an emergency access point. Two pyrotechnically released side canopy windows provide emergency escape points for the cockpit crew. The emergency exits will permit evacuation of the flight crew within 30 seconds and all passengers within 60 seconds using half of the aircraft exits.
The blades simply fray into individual strands that pose no harm to the occupants.
Bell Boeing V-22 Program Director Gene Cunningham thanked the employees of Bell and Boeing who build the V-22 and noted that 12 MV-22 Ospreys are now in Iraq performing combat missions with VMM-263
.
The United States Air Force recently awarded a contract to build its new aerial refueling platform to the European defense consortium EADS. Incredibly, sources inside the Pentagon reveal the EADS design is unable to refuel the service's revolutionary new tilt-rotor V-22 aircraft.
.
Continuing his reorganization of Bell Helicopter, Chief Executive Richard Millman has shaken up the company's engineering leadership and confounded some longtime Bell people by bringing in a past critic of the V-22 Osprey.
.
The hiring of Lappos, in particular, has set off alarm bells and stirred anger among some current and former Bell employees because of his past criticisms, in public and on Internet forums, over the marketing claims and actual performance of the V-22 Osprey and Bell's much-touted, long-delayed BA609 civil tilt-rotor aircraft.
Originally posted by what-lies-beneith
The lack of ability to autorotate to a safe landing is also going to be a serious problem with the V-22. If power is lost below 1600 ft. while in helicopter mode the most likely outcome is a fatal crash. How can you have a combat transport that will be hauling loads of troops into hot LZs and not be able to safely land when the inevitable hits to engines and proprotars occure.
I understand how bad the Marines want this aircraft to work, unfortunatly for a combat transport that is how it operates...badly.
Originally posted by Phoebus
Originally posted by what-lies-beneith
The lack of ability to autorotate to a safe landing is also going to be a serious problem with the V-22. If power is lost below 1600 ft. while in helicopter mode the most likely outcome is a fatal crash. How can you have a combat transport that will be hauling loads of troops into hot LZs and not be able to safely land when the inevitable hits to engines and proprotars occure.
I understand how bad the Marines want this aircraft to work, unfortunatly for a combat transport that is how it operates...badly.
For that to hapend, both engines need to die simultaniously...
the Osprey is build so that one engine can power both blades if a single engine fails.