The 9/11 Coincidences - best documentary out there

Ok, I realized that this documentary may not have been seen by everybody here. Its the best and most complete of them all in my opinion. So Ive linked to every part of it below for your convenience. Enjoy.

Its called 9/11 Coincidences, and here is the list of its parts. There is no need to watch them in order since they are all about a single topic.

Part 1 - Introduction

Part 2 - All 3 buildings collapsed at free fall speed

Part 3 - Explosives in the buildings

Part 4 - Government refuses to release pictures from cameras near the Pentagon

Part 5 - Project for a New American Century

Part 6 - Cheney ordered Rumsfeld to give him control of NORAD during 9/11

Part 7 - WTC Building 7 intentionally "pulled" for profit

Part 8 - Steel doesnt melt by jetfuel

Part 9 - Presidents younger brother installs "new security system" in WTC before 9/11

Part 10 - About the 9/11 commission report

Part 11 - Who benefited from 9/11? Not bin laden. Not Saddam. Not Al Quida.

Part 12 - Bush saw the first plane hit, Bush admits to explosives in buildings

Part 13 - The Bush-Laden connection

Part 14 - The Bush-Laden connection continued

Part 15 - Osama Bin Laden and the CIA connection

Part 16 - Faked Osama Bin Ladens and fake hijackings

Part 17 - When the stocks hit bottom on 9/12, somebody made a fortune

Nobody has any comments on this excellent documentary? I find the part where they install the "security system" aka explosives in WTC quite interesting, as well as who really profited from this event.

Nice find, Copernicus - flagged.

I'm going through them now, I wish there weren't quite so many parts though

You get a flag and a star C.
I have seen these about 3 times and I think these really are the best videos for this topic. Glad to see someone finally put them up here, lrts see the skeptics debunk these then!

Excellent set of videos! I found part 11 about who benefited the most interesting. I still have a few left to go through however.

Can anybody tell me where part 10 is? I skipped that earlier because I couldn't find it. Now when I click on the link provided it says that the video has been removed.

yes this is a great documentary, it was one of the first videos i saw that opened up my eyes to what really happened on the day of 9/11.

One part in particular I'm skeptic of. The part where they try to debunk that Bush saw the plane hit, and that they think he might have confused the first plane with the second. They show the quote at the bottom when Bush is in the classroom- along the lines of an aide saying "a second plane has hit". How do we know he was not saying "A plane" and not "A second plane". Bush could be confusing the planes. Very weak point being forced upon the viewer.

I gave you another star. How can you argue with the melted steel episode? Kerosene heaters do not melt as they burn what is essentially jet fuel. How much more down to earth can an argument get? The episode on the put options was good also.

reply to post by theshow47

---

I believe Bush states that he saw the FIRST plane hit and thought that it was just an accident. It wasn't until his staff notified him of the second plane hit, that he new the country was "under attack". Nothing to be skeptical about really.

Nice copernicus. My first Flag

btw im new to ATS...Hello everyone

Yes, youtube removes parts of this documentary all the time. Guess they dont want people knowing the truth. Specially part 8 and 11 have been removed a lot in the past.

I cant edit the original post myself, so if a moderator could replace part 10 in the original post with the one below, I would be grateful.

Part 10 - About the 9/11 commission report

I checked the other links as well and they work for now.

Video about part 8 being removed:

YouTube Link

Video about part 11 being removed:

YouTube Link

Keep telling me about dead links.

Thanks!


[edit on 13-10-2007 by Copernicus]

reply to post by POKEMANS

---

Welcome to ATS hope your stay is as good as everyone else's!

Hope you find your way around ok

Omen

Some comments....

Part 8

Jet fuel didnt need to melt any steel...just soften it, which happens at a temperature much lower than the melting point.

Part 9

Marvin Bush was gone from Securacom long before his brother was elected President and Wirt Walker isnt related....unless its the fourth cousin of a third in-law twelve times removed (in other words NOT). And Scott Forbes? give me a break...he knew about a couple floors that his company was in....nowhere NEAR a "power-down" of the whole building let alone the OTHER tower....

Part 17

Yes someone guessed correctly that AA and UA's stocks were going to suffer around sept 11, 2001. Couldnt possibly have had anything to do with the fact that both airlines were going to release quarterly reports that were expected to be bad. Of course, someone also bet against those stocks about half a dozen times that year.

When I feel the need for a laugh, Ill watch the others....

wow....some of the best evidence i have seen or heard so far

So where did the molten metal come from? Where did the sulfur come from? You can't debunk half of the evidence or half of the statement. The big picture includes the pools and chunks of molten metal in the basement.

I believe that the cut I-beams were in part 8 also, how does softened metal shear through an I-beam at that type of angle and leave melted metal to solidify on the cut?



I don't know about any of this. It would seem to be pretty straight forward to identify Bush family members and their place of employment. Scott Forbes believes what he believes, it is pretty minor evedince about the construction on the other floors. But the power outage would be easily verifiable, if you wanted to prove it one way or another. Wish I could have been there to see "the internet upgrade" for myself.



That was one phenominal freaking guess!

Anyway...

This was a pretty good series and NufffRespect has part 18 posted to his YouTube page now. I don't see how anyone can look at the big picture and still believe the official story! I wonder if it is the wave of wacky theories out there (holograms, nukes, rocket soldiers, etc.). I personally couldn't help but notice that NufffRespect has links to some of the whacky ones and even to David Ickie! Still the story speaks for itself. The 911 commision was so neocon inbread, they obviously ignored a lot of basic facts and admittedly couldn't get their hands on all the evidence requested.

Thanks for the heads up mate.

Part 18 - Rescue workers says it looked like a bomb went off in the lobby



[edit on 25-10-2007 by Copernicus]

So far, one skeptic wanna-be has tried to debunk a few things and made some claims, but where is the supporting info? At least a link to a news article or something?

I'd like to see some more attempts to counter the info in this doc.

bump

Okay looking for sources huh?

Put options on UA and AA...
www.business.uiuc.edu...

Also, check into the number of put options placed on the airlines for all of 2001. The trading around Sept 11, was neither unusual, nor unexpected considering the information available on the airlines performance that was released the last week of August/first week of September.












www.marketwatch.com... if you care to look through a few hundred pages of history....

American's stock prices...

finance.yahoo.com...

Not quite so sinister....



You mean the cuts that were made by the people clearing away the wreckage of the buildings AFTER 9/11?

Presenting a documentary (if you can call it that) is not an argument. If you have a particular part you are interested in, bring it up. Then it can be discussed. But using someone else's entire documentary as your argument is not a valid argument.

This is simply another amateur video of conspiracy cliches. All of which are very easily debunked. But presenting them as a big batch is just an attempt to feel victory because no one wants to be bothered with having to address 10 conspiracies which ALL have already been discussed on the forum 1000s of times already and arguments for all of the claims have already been made over and over on this very forum.

So again, bring up a part of it that you are most convinced of and I would be more than happy to offer some explanations. Heck, in this very thread people are already talking about melted steel, when there was no melted steel to begin with. Just one good example for you.