It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by zysin5
to announce he will do what the terrorists want.
You can spin it like that if you want... But the way I see it here.. ITs what the PEOPLE want!! See many mistake compassion for weakness, sure thats true.. But the people of the USA didnt want a WAR!! And we sertinly dont want more bloodshead!!
Alot of people are under this mind control still...
They ask me.. Why do you hate America? Why do you hate our troops?
Why will you do what the terroist want you to do??
More spin IMO...
This nation was suppose to be build upon what is best for the PEOPLE..
Not what is best for Federal Banks, and big Governments..
Originally posted by photobug
I am so tired of all the media out there. They use the polls to justify their position and when they dont like the results they have to offer an explanation as to how the poll is possibly wrong. I didnt hear them mention that the poll may be wrong for rudy or any other candidate it's always about knocking Ron Paul. Watching parts of the debate it's really amusing when ron paul makes a statement how the onstage microphones pick up a laugh from another debater and the laughs always take on the tone of hahhahaha I cant believe he just said that. But in the end It's not the audience laughing but it's the audience applauding.
[edit on 6-9-2007 by photobug]
Originally posted by sp00n1
reply to post by Electro38
1) Osama bin Laden
2) Michael Scheurer, former CIA analyst. (Osama even referenced him in his last video for this fact.)
3) 9-11 commission.
4) The list goes on forever.
[edit on 9/7/2007 by sp00n1]
Originally posted by LordHrodric
It's sad how some people accept the spoon-fed medicine the media gives you without wondering if it's good or bad. Investigate yourself and read more than just FoxNews or CNN. Get a wide range of sources then decide for yourself.
I support Paul because he doesn't flip flop the issue and bases his ideas on the constitution. Now he has a stronger following. The other candidates and the media have to recognize it, not ignore it by calling him crazy. That's argumentum ad hominem
Originally posted by section8citizen
reply to post by Electro38
I think of it like this........ Let's say I go to your house. I kick the crap out of you and I stay. I stay as long as I want, I do what I want, and your opinion on it makes no difference. Then one day, I realize how wrong I am and I leave. Am I making any concessions? In the end all I really proved is that I can come back anytime I want and you couldn't stop me. If we were to leave the Middle East, all we really do is take our forces out of a place they have no business being in to begin with. However, is it not obvious that should we ever need a reason to return that it will not be a problem? So where is the concession in that?