reply to post by vox2442
look....your missing my point.
i never said syria did or didnt have a right to be mad about the golan heights. i never said israil shouldnt accept the concequences of the actions
they have taken. you are reading far too much into what i have posted.
im simply stating, syria might have taken a routin servalence flight ( illegal or not) as a pretext to start a war, and to say "israil made the first
move". that would put syria in a position of response, instead of attack.
should they (syria) have the right to respond to a violation of there air space? sure. but why so heavy handed now, and not so all the other
times.
furthermore, if it was just a servalence flight, i find it very hard to believe syria is not doing some spying on there own. not to say two wrongs
make a right, but, why blow this out of perportion?