It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Blitersety
And this is what I came up with: the only reason the government would want a depression is so that it would be easier to wipe out the existing government and its supporters and set up a communist government and have complete control of the superpower in order to insure their world domination.
Originally posted by Blitersety
to h(ell)town (no offense; just joking): I came up with the answer because I used the IQ that I happen to have, which is way higher above average than it should be for my age. Can you come up with a better answer?
Originally posted by MaskedAvatar
Just to avoid your embarrassment, IQ is in no way dependent on age.
Originally posted by MaskedAvatar
Originally posted by Blitersety
to h(ell)town (no offense; just joking): I came up with the answer because I used the IQ that I happen to have, which is way higher above average than it should be for my age. Can you come up with a better answer?
I think jagdflieger was on to something.
Just to avoid your embarrassment, IQ is in no way dependent on age.
[Edited on 18-1-2004 by MaskedAvatar]
OK, first of all, what EXACTLY did jadglflieger say? And second if all, what I meant by that is the fact that I am only 12 years old and there are other people who are 50 years old and have had a lot more time to learn and study than me and yet I am still smarter than them and have a higher IQ than them. ( I was hinting thta I was a pretty smart person).
Originally posted by surfup
Originally posted by MaskedAvatar
Just to avoid your embarrassment, IQ is in no way dependent on age.
I disagree, it is dependent to some extent on your age.
Obviously a nine year old IQ is much lower than the IQ of a person of your age, (unless you are less than nine years old and I hope you are not).
But under special cases and very very very very rare cases it is not.
Originally posted by surfup
Originally posted by MaskedAvatar
Just to avoid your embarrassment, IQ is in no way dependent on age.
I disagree, it is dependent to some extent on your age.
Obviously a nine year old IQ is much lower than the IQ of a person of your age, (unless you are less than nine years old and I hope you are not).
But under special cases and very very very very rare cases it is not.
Originally posted by MaskedAvatar
This is the notion I was trying to get across - an adult's IQ is not higher than a child's at all.
The IQ of a nine year old normed against a population of children on a child centred test will be the same as an adult IQ for an adult of the same ability level normed against adults. It's just how it works. IQ as a measure is not dependent on age at all. Experience and knowledge may be, but not IQ. That's off topic, but there are reasonable IQ topics here.
Originally posted by specialasianX
Look what happened when the economy collapsed in germany in the 20's and 30's the NAZI's rose to power... now if the government were to collapse the economy it would pave the way for a more radical government to take place or possibly as has been discussed various times (in realtion to terror atacks all be it) martial law... which would give the government more control over the country...