It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Gun crimes in England have almost doubled since 1997, when a ban on firearms began.
According to the Sunday Times of London, crimes in which guns were used numbered 4,671 in 2005-06.
Also, government officials report that most gun crime is committed by children and teenagers under 18 years old.
David Davis, the shadow home secretary, told the Telegraph: "What this shows is that the majority of these crimes are committed by youngsters under 18.
"The government's policy has failed with the group most responsible for this increase in crime. It is long past time the Government stopped believing its own propaganda, and took measures to get a grip."
© 2007 NewsMax. All rights reserved.
Originally posted by electronQM
One conclusion that can be drawn from this, however: Wtf is wrong with kids today?
I also have to respectfully disagree with your assertion that criminals are more likely to break into a home they think contains no weapons.
[edit on 1-9-2007 by electronQM]
[edit on 1-9-2007 by electronQM]
Originally posted by electronQM
That assumes there is a causal link between the law passed in 1997, and the increase of gun crimes.
Originally posted by cavscout
Originally posted by electronQM
That assumes there is a causal link between the law passed in 1997, and the increase of gun crimes.
It doesn’t matter much if there is a link or not. The point is that gun bans don’t work. They never have, anywhere, and this one in the UK is a failure as well.
What you cant deny, however, is that without gun restrictions more law abiding citizens would be able to defend themselves from the ever increasing number of uneducated criminal thugs that have begun to plague the streets of the UK.
The UK gun ban has made the UK a much more dangerous place to live.
If the ability to carry a gun saves just one life, isn’t it worth it?
Originally posted by electronQM
Maybe instead of putting a gun in each citizens hand, we should put a book there
Originally posted by cavscout
What you cant deny, however, is that without gun restrictions more law abiding citizens would be able to defend themselves from the ever increasing number of uneducated criminal thugs that have begun to plague the streets of the UK.
The UK gun ban has made the UK a much more dangerous place to live.
If the ability to carry a gun saves just one life, isn’t it worth it?
Originally posted by sminkeypinkey
We've done this one to death here.
The recorded increses in UK gun crime are in very large part down to the increased use of replicas and air guns.
Not actual firearms as such.
Sorry and all gun fans but that's the truth here.
[edit on 1-9-2007 by sminkeypinkey]
That's one point to raise - 'gun crime', in UK statistics at least, includes replicas, air guns, bb guns and so forth as well as actual handguns/shotguns/rifles unless otherwise stated.
Originally posted by infiltr8uthe only people you will hurt with a gun ban is the non criminal homeowner/renter that wants to defend him/herself against rape or another violent crime and they wont have the means to do so
Originally posted by electronQM
That assumes there is a causal link between the law passed in 1997, and the increase of gun crimes. There is no proof that such a link exists, only that since 1997, gun crime has doubled. Why it has doubled is not clear.
Originally posted by sminkeypinkey
The recorded increses in UK gun crime are in very large part down to the increased use of replicas and air guns.
Not actual firearms as such.
Originally posted by spencerjohnstone
Look at knife crime compared to gun crimes, that far outways gun crime. More needs to be done to tackle knife crime as well as gun-crminal related offences.
Originally posted by spencerjohnstone
Look at knife crime compared to gun crimes, that far outways gun crime. More needs to be done to tackle knife crime as well as gun-crminal related offences.
Originally posted by donotdoit
If gun bans do not work why does Australia have such low gun crime rates maybe they might use a screwdriver instead of a gun. But it would be alot easier to defend against a screwdriver than a gun (you can also run away from a screwdriver).
(my bolding for emphasis)
Australia
The Australian government made sweeping changes to the firearms legislation in 1997. However, the total homicide rate, after having remained basically flat from 1995 to 2001, has now begun climbing again. While violent crime is decreasing in the United States, it is increasing in Australia. Over the past six years, the overall rate of violent crime in Australia has been on the rise – for example, armed robberies have jumped 166 percent nationwide.
The confiscation and destruction of legally owned firearms has cost Australian taxpayers at least $500 million. The cost of the police services bureaucracy, including the costly infrastructure of the gun registration system, has increased by $200 million since 1997.
“And for what?” asks Mauser. “There has been no visible impact on violent crime. It is impossible to justify such a massive amount of the taxpayers’ money for no decrease in crime. For that kind of tax money, the police could have had more patrol cars, shorter shifts, or better equipment.”
The Fraser Institute is an independent research and educational organization based in Canada. Its mission is to measure, study, and communicate the impact of competitive markets and government intervention on the welfare of individuals. To protect the Institute’s independence, it does not accept grants from governments or contracts for research.