It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by mirageofdeceit
The 757 he was flying wasn't equipped with GPS (unless you are suggesting he had a hand-held GPS with him?).
[edit on 27-8-2007 by mirageofdeceit]
Have you ever flown into Reagan airport? You can see it while you land there.
Originally posted by mirageofdeceit
The 757 he was flying wasn't equipped with GPS (unless you are suggesting he had a hand-held GPS with him?).
[edit on 27-8-2007 by mirageofdeceit]
D. NAVIGATION SYSTEMS DESCRIPTION AND ACTIVITY
The Boeing 757 keeps track of its own position using the Inertial Navigation System (INS),
which uses acceleration sensors to calculate the motion of the airplane over the ground. The
INS position calculation is periodically updated and corrected using data from ground based
radio navigation stations, called “very high frequency omnirange stations” (VORs). By tuning
a receiver to the signals broadcast from a VOR, the bearing from the airplane to the VOR
can be determined. Tuning in two or more stations and knowing the positions of each, a fix
of the airplane position can be obtained.
The 757 has two VOR receivers. The crew can manually tune each of these receivers to a
desired station (provided the station is in range), and view the airplane’s bearing relative to
the station on a special display mode on the Electronic Horizontal Situation Indicator (EHSI).
This mode is most often used when the crew wants to fly either towards or away from the
selected VOR station, along a specific bearing or “radial” to or from the station. In other
modes, the airplane will automatically tune in VOR stations along the airplane’s route in
order to obtain position fixes. The system generally selects stations whose bearings from the
airplane differ by about 90 degrees; this configuration results in the most accurate position
fixes.
Originally posted by mirageofdeceit
Because the aircraft was built in 1996 and GPS wasn't an option at that time. It could be retro-fitted, but it was determined that this aircraft was never retro-fitted with it. It was a factory-fit option for new builds, but not all airlines took the option even then.
[edit on 27-8-2007 by mirageofdeceit]
Are you people beyond gullible?
Rhumb lines
A ‘rhumb line’ (or loxodrome) is a path of constant bearing, which crosses all meridians at the same angle.
Sailors used to navigate along rhumb lines since it is easier to follow a constant compass bearing than to constantly adjust the bearing as is needed to follow a great circle. Rhumb lines are straight lines on a Mercator Projection map.
Formula: Δφ = ln(tan(lat2/2+π/4)/tan(lat1/2+π/4))
if E:W line q = cos(lat1) (length of a circle of latitude)
otherwise q = Δlat/Δφ
d = √[Δlat² + q².Δlon²].R
θ = atan2(Δlon, Δφ)
where ln is natural log, Δlon is taking shortest route (
Originally posted by Conundrum04
So debunkers let me get this straight:
The hijackers are flying towards the pentagon but decide to make a 330 degree turn to re-align the plane to hit the one and only side of the pentagon that just recently got reinforced just in case of an attack on said pentagon. Said hijackers, instead of doing the most obvious bonzai straight dive into this penta-gon, decide that it would be easier to fly in feet above the penta-gon lawn to hit the only reinforced section of the penta-gon causing the least amount of damage to said penta-gon possible.
Yeah, that's believeable.
Are you people beyond gullible?
Are you people even smart enough to discern a Spielberg movie from the real world?
originally posted by conundrum04
The hijackers are flying towards the pentagon but decide to make a 330 degree turn to re-align the plane to hit the one and only side of the pentagon that just recently got reinforced just in case of an attack on said pentagon. Said hijackers, instead of doing the most obvious bonzai straight dive into this penta-gon, decide that it would be easier to fly in feet above the penta-gon lawn to hit the only reinforced section of the penta-gon causing the least amount of damage to said penta-gon possible.
Originally posted by Conundrum04
...to hit the only reinforced section of the penta-gon causing the least amount of damage to said penta-gon possible.
Originally posted by mirageofdeceit
Was a skilled pilot flying, and not a hijacker? Well, given the altimeter reset on the way down, this is likely. Whoever it was, it wasn't this incompetent hijacker that we're told was flying.
The plane was hijacked, and Hanjour was given the controls to pilot the plane into the Pentagon at 9:37 A.M. Hanjour obtained a commercial pilot's certificate in 1999 and according to the chief instructor, "Despite Hanjour's poor reviews, he did have some ability as a pilot." and "There's no doubt in my mind that once that (hijacked jet) got going, he could have pointed that plane at a building and hit it," he said.