It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Tom Bedlam
We've got several generations of weapons up there now, from hydrogen fluoride lasers to little semi-autonomous robots.
Originally posted by Vixion
Weaponization of space ? Its .... poop, i carnt see how us placing weapons in space is going to come across to other races in the universe, we can NOT do long race inter galatc travel, so a race of people who can, dont have weapons to match our own >?
Take Care, Vix
Originally posted by Murcielago
you people are a little..."out there". lol
Unisol, I very highly doubt we have such an infrastructure, the only satellite networked system that covers the whole globe in GPS...which grant it, is military by its nature...but it has no weapons...but is used to guide weapons.
Originally posted by Murcielago
you people are a little..."out there". lol
Unisol, I very highly doubt we have such an infrastructure, the only satellite networked system that covers the whole globe in GPS...which grant it, is military by its nature...but it has no weapons...but is used to guide weapons. all the GPS sats also can detect a nuclear explosion anywhere on earth.
Originally posted by Beachcoma
GPS -- 24 satellites
Globalstar -- 40 satellites
IRIDIUM --66 satellites
GLONASS (Russian GPS) -- 24 satellites
Originally posted by Beachcoma
Then why mention GPS? Though it's a military satellite constellation first, it's far from being an "attack satellite."
Originally posted by Murcielago
I was basically saying we have no sats that are for attacking an enemy on the ground.
Originally posted by Murcielago
I dont believe there currently is a world wide coverage of satellites that can "attack".
and I believe there is currently 27 operational GPS sats.
Globalstar & Iridium are telecommunication sats (as is milstar).
and GLONASS is a joke, they dont have that many sats, they have no where hear world wide coverage....they can only see like 1/4 of the world.....and most of that...is them.
The system offers a standard C/A positioning and timing service giving horizontal position accuracy within 180 feet (55 meters) and vertical position within 230 feet (70 meters) based on measurements from four satellite signals. P is a more accurate signal for Russian military use.
There are very few inexpensive GLONASS-only receivers for consumers on the market. However, commercial GPS receivers often are capable of receiving both NAVSTAR and GLONASS data.
This GLONASS system provides accuracy that is better than GPS with SA on and worse than GPS with SA off.
www.spacetoday.org...
Comparative Overview of GPS and GLONASS
A comparative overview of GPS and GLONASS is apropos before proceeding.
GPS and the Russian GLONASS system have some similarities and some
substantial differences as well. While GPS space vehicles operate with one L1
frequency for the entire constellation, GLONASS satellites each have their own
discrete frequency. The frequency allocation scheme for GLONASS, which
employs the Frequency Division Multiple Access (FDMA) technique, is 1602 +
K(0.5625) MHz , where K = the frequency channel number. Each GLONASS
satellite is identified by a unique orbital slot number.
Another difference between the two SATNAV systems is that the Russian
government does not implement a policy of signal degradation on the L1
frequency. Hence, the stand alone accuracy of a GLONASS receiver is
measurably better than that of a CA Code GPS receiver. L1 GLONASS rms
accuracy is about 16 meters; L1 GPS is 100 meters rms with SA on
pro.magellangps.com...
The navigational signals transmitted by the satellites are received by GLONASS-receivers. These receivers determine object’s position by the method of received signals’ triangulation. Used by the civil marines the code allows determine position of an object with the accuracy up to 50 - 70 meters. In the mode of usual access the GLONASS system exceeds the GPS system in accuracy, at the same time providing opportunity for operation in areas of higher latitudes.
www.dkart.ru...
I would bet that USAF is building a solid state laser satellite, but that would be considered an anti-satellite weapon....
and not one that could strike ground targets.....that tech is around 15 years off.