Originally posted by TKainZero
As the craft exits in this video, a bunch of lights come out of where, and the person decides to stop recording in the middle of the event.
thats
a big clue
If i were taking video of a UFO, i dont think i would be recording for just a few seconds, but rather take a lot of photoage, even interviewing people
areound after the object has disaperaed from view.
I think this is all to common mistake.
"When the evidence in question is not done how I would have done it. It must be fake."
This in my personal opinion is not a healthy rational.
" It's too shaky. "
" It's too still. "
" It's too blurry
" It's too clear " Yes I have read complaints about images being to clear.
I'm sorry if I sounding like a smug git. But all the above phrases in quotes have become rather old in the debunking arena.
And I apologize to TKainZero. I am not trying to insult you or be rude in any manner.
But its just like I said. The whole " I would have done it different so it must be a hoax. " Debunking method is just... old.
None of us really know how we would react if we were to witness a UFO.
Oh sure we talk big about how we would handle the situation like one cool Daddy'O.
But the truth is until we have been in that situation fist hand, we really don't know what we would do. We can only speculate.
And also this in not a criticism on the skeptics. We need to be skeptical, We have to be. Just we need to be skeptical in a logical manner.