post by Freeborn
That's because the architects or the gods or whatever you want to call them have always been around (and always will)! But they are even
better than Bill Clinton when it comes to "plausible deniability"!

For architects or gods...substitute the word ...demigods.
For "plausable deniability" substute the words counterfit.
Here is the catch or knowlege to understanding a counterfit and how a counterfit works.
A counterfit is not the opposite of the real thing ..it is as close to the real thing as possible so as to pass for the real thing.
Things or conditions must be made to look or appear as if everything is in order ..even when denying.
I will give you a textbook example of a counterfit for which if you have ever heard preachers preach on this they are usually hesitant or never make
this connection with a counterfit or the counterfitter.
IN the Bible there is a narrative of an event where some PHarisess come before Jesus bringing a woman...caught in Adultery ....in the very act.
John8:3.
They inquire of Jesus ...What say you Rabbi concerning this matter?
THese Pharisees quote that the Law of Moses declares that such should be stoned.
First off they didnt care one whit about the woman caught in adultery.
They wanted to discredit Jesus in his interpretation of the Law of Moses.
THis was nothing more than politics.....just as it is counterfitted today...nothing new here. Some might call this "Gotcha politics" even way back
then.
Most preachers tend to use this to teach that Jesus told the woman ..
"Go and sin no more" after asking the Pharisees ..He without sin cast the first stone."
But watch what actually happened here...for which most never want to make the connection for us. The counterfit...of the counterfitter.
The pharisees claim and boast of keeping the Law of Moses in all parts..zealously and faithfully. THey claim to have caught a woman in adultery ..in
the very act.
They bring this woman ...caught in the very act before Jesus for Judgement.
Note that they do not bring the man caught in the very act. You cannot catch a woman in adultery...in the very act... without catching a man. Not
possible.
THe Law of Moses by their own words..requires stoning for Adultery. However it declares that they shall be stoned. Meaning more than one.
The law the Pharisees claim to be keeping says that women get stoned for adultery men dont. Why.,..the man was absent.
The pharisees were not keeping the Law of Moses at all...but another law.
This also means that they were keeping another god than the God of Moses and the Law.
They were counterfitters. Their god was a counterfit too.
They had switched gods and not told anyone ..conducting themselves as if nothing had changed and they were still obedient holy men.
Not much different from our politicians today with "plausable deniability."
Give me the name of the counterfitter??!!
You dont have to be particulary bright or rocket material to catch it.
Notice that the pharisees were attempting to overlay this counterfit doctrine or practice on the Law of Moses as if it was the Law of Moses...when in
fact is was no such thing. It was a counterfit and they were of the counterfitter.
There are many examples of this type of conduct around you if you have enough informations and can think outside the blocks or placebo issues
(counterfits) which confront us daily to keep us off the main truth or issues.
To keep us neutralized or ineffective while someone else stays on course.
Well...we are getting a bit off the main topic line of Islamic Extremism but it applies there too.
Thanks,
Orangetom