It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by 7Ayreon
It is no joke. Already 105 dead as of today in Iraq and Globalization news points to a lot of political debate to wage war with Iran because, of this. There is a lot happening today, if you can't see it, than, you can't see it.
news.bbc.co.uk...
/7A out...
Originally posted by neformore
You know what saddens me?
The United States is turning something that affects the whole planet into a party-political issue.
You're shooting the messenger.
Read the message.
Originally posted by forsakenwayfarer
What happens to the messenger when the message he brings is a lie?
National and international science academies and professional societies have assessed the current scientific opinion on climate change, in particular recent global warming. These assessments have largely followed or endorsed the IPCC position that "An increasing body of observations gives a collective picture of a warming world and other changes in the climate system... There is new and stronger evidence that most of the warming observed over the last 50 years is attributable to human activities"
Originally posted by forsakenwayfarer
If Al Gore is such a big backer of the global warming myth;
WHY WAS AL GORE AFRAID TO TAKE THIS MAN'S WAGER?
AL GORE - A LIAR.
I can forsee problems arising with whiners about the site; here's ACCUWEATHER reporting on the issue - AL GORE - STILL A LIAR.
Originally posted by forsakenwayfarer
Point being - I don't buy it. We have a 10% view of a BILLION YEAR OLD SYSTEM IN ACTION.
The planet was covered to a rough extent of about 50% with ICE ten thousand years ago.
...has grossed over $24 million in the U.S. and over $49 million worldwide as of June 3, 2007, making it the third-highest-grossing documentary in the U.S. to date (after Fahrenheit 9/11 and March of the Penguins).
Originally posted by neformore
You know what saddens me?
The United States is turning something that affects the whole planet into a party-political issue.
You're shooting the messenger.
Read the message.
Originally posted by zeeon
..I'm directing my posts more towards those people who believe GW is a big corporate conspiracy and that the fact that the world is warming up is a big lie.
Just wanted to clarify.
Originally posted by Raud
I think it's great that his documentary became so succsessful, that means that a lot of people saw, and will see it. If that generates money, it's all very logic isn't it? I mean, he did try to get his message out didn't he? He made the movie and he owns the rights to it, doesn't he?
73 million dollars is nothing in the petro-economic world that spreads the rumor that there is no GW.
Anyway, it doesn't seem like any of us are gonna change opinion anytime soon so lets drop this.
Originally posted by Long Lance
so, you're disputing NASA's artticles? that's gross, because, frankly, what does qualify as a credible source, then? anything that floats your boat and helps your agenda? i'm not sure you want to go down that route - are you?
'pulled from the web archive' ... so mad that censorship has its limits?
oh yeah, just i case you really missed it: NASA is operating satellites, which in turn give them enormous amounts of data on the planet's surface developments... good enough? the data set is quite drastic, one day per year, three weeks in 20 years, do you think you'll need a peer review of the data? ice no ice, what gives, let's call it a consensus and publish
PS: i have no idea how much of Antarctica is currently melting and how much isn't, i just presented conflicting evidence, which many people would consider legit, your reaction to it is tale-telling, imho. oh and one last thing: i could not care less how many alarming papers you can dig up, as long as the points presented are not refute, they stand, casting a very bad light on the honesty of established climatology, because:
you can't just 'miss' an increase in the length of ice seasons by three weeks, can you?
Originally posted by forsakenwayfarer
No, lets not.
Why don't we start talking about the exact 'carbon footprint' that was made BY the film itself? The toxic chemicals used in production of the film, the petrol used to transport the film, the private jets that flew Gore around to screenings and production(because Gore is "too good" for public transportation.)?
Carbon neutral. Yeah. Right.
The ONLY good I see coming from this film is that proceeds are being donated.
The only problem is that only Al's PERSONAL profits were donated. The rest went to... you got it right, more big companies burning more fossil fuels. Vicious cycle, no?
No, let's not drop this.
Originally posted by zeeon
Chupa -
In response (quickly, I have to leave) my entire post wasn't directed at you, only segments of it.
Originally posted by zeeon
LOL - I'm using common sense to dispute your "evidence." don't get mad at me because your pulling outdated and removed information from the web archive and trying to pass it off as current information.
So the fact that NASA operates satellites is enough to help convince you that global warming is a sham? Despite the plethora of other well established academic and governmental agencies ..
And by the way, you are the one who is pulling data that floats your boat - and helps your agenda - not me. I don't, and shouldn't have to quote the miryad of available, consensual data that supports global warming.
It is people like you who try to refute the obvious that are reaching for any piece of supporting information to back your cause. Realistically, if global warming is really happening - your hurting, not helping.
Get real and try to understand that either way - wether or not global warming is really happening - being "green" is a good thing and we should all do it, not find excuses to be yet another lazy american.