It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by TheStarMan
How would you know that is an explosion? I would be more likely to believe that the sound is one of the upper floors pancaking onto the lower floor. To me that sounded like an impact, not an explosion.
Originally posted by Azriphale
Seen this video many times. Its been in a few recent 911 "documentarys". Obviously something strange happened that day. And that noise, if real, was certainly no pancaking floor or building impact. It was a loud explosive.
Originally posted by Zenagain
Anyone who doubt's that's an explosion is living in a fantasy world.
Originally posted by BeZerk
In the video i posted, there was a documentary which showed the firefighters on the phone but dramtically cut out the bit with the loud explosion, i will try and find this video for you and you can have a look. If it was not an explosion why did they cut it out?
I will try and find this documentary that was aired on PBS i believe.
BeZerK
Originally posted by CaptainObvious
While you're searching for that ...make sure you find the countless "truther" videos that ADD explosions, screams, and also ones that loop video clips.....
It would be naive to think that there wasnt any explosions....just once again... i have yet to see any proof that the explosions were bombs.
Originally posted by BeZerk
If your looking for proof that explosives were used there are plenty of characteristics of a controlled demolition. Squibs, loud explosions, basement explosions etc.
Originally posted by BeZerk
Now lets examine what NIST said:
"Did NIST look for evidence of the WTC towers being brought down by controlled demolition? Was the steel tested for explosives or thermite residues? The combination of thermite and sulfur (called thermate) "slices through steel like a hot knife through butter.
NIST STATEMENT: "NIST did not test for the residue of these compounds in the steel."
Why did they not test for the residue for explosive compounds? Were they afraid they were going to find some residue that could link it up to explosive material?
Maybe it has something to do with the $3 Million of funding the investigation only recieved? Yep thats it.... spot on....
BeZerK
Originally posted by CaptainObvious
Your so called squibs are up for serious debate. We can start an additional thread for that. My opinion..compressed air.
Loud explosions: Transformers, Fireballs, Steel Falling...etc...This has all been documented by NYPD, FDNY, NYPA.
Basement Explosions were in fact fireballs.
First of all 3 million dollars? I thought it was A LOT more than that!?
They didn't test for thermite because they felt they had no reason to. Also..there is not one piece of evidence from the steel that showed a thermite cut beam or column.
Originally posted by BeZerk
Oh thats right the compressed air theory is like the theory of the tooth fairy giving you a shiney gold coin when in the process of taking your tooth from under your pillow
Good one... How does compressed air travel through the elevator smashing out windows 70+ floors below the collapse. If that is what your saying then your level of intellect really does not surprise me.
Originally posted by CaptainObvious
Bezerk...if you would like to debate issues here, i suggest you refrain from your playground antics. I will be more than happy to answer your questions in a mature manner. I give your posts the due respect. I suggest you do the same.
If you would like to continue with your 3rd grade posts aimed at insulting me, you wont get much in response.
That being said i will respond to your post. ... i just need to grab another beer
First of all 3 million dollars? I thought it was A LOT more than that!?
Originally posted by BeZerk
Want to prove me wrong?
The agency received $16 million for the investigation in September 2002 from the FY 2002 supplemental appropriation. NIST redirected $3.4 million in fiscal year 2002 to begin a three-part plan in response to the WTC disaster. The FY 2003 appropriation included an increase of $3 million for related research and development.
The President's FY 2005 budget request of $9 million (including a $4 million increase) focuses on using the results of the World Trade Center investigation to provide the technical basis for improving standards, technology, and practices for building construction and for the safety of emergency first responders.
Originally posted by BeZerk
Explosives OR thermite. There was plenty of evidence to suggest that explosives were present in the building. What type of explosives i would not know thus a thorough testing for these compounds would have distinguished what type of explosives was used.
Lets examine the following pictures:
Originally posted by CaptainObvious
No problem:
The agency received $16 million for the investigation in September 2002 from the FY 2002 supplemental appropriation. NIST redirected $3.4 million in fiscal year 2002 to begin a three-part plan in response to the WTC disaster. The FY 2003 appropriation included an increase of $3 million for related research and development.
The President's FY 2005 budget request of $9 million (including a $4 million increase) focuses on using the results of the World Trade Center investigation to provide the technical basis for improving standards, technology, and practices for building construction and for the safety of emergency first responders.
wtc.nist.gov...