Port Chicago - America's First Atomic Test, page 4
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 2 times


reply posted on 30-8-2005 @ 04:02 PM by Historian
May I please ask a very stupid question, perhaps because I was a lawyer in a former incarnation? And please excuse me for not wading through all the evidence online. I have seen a TV documentary about the mutiny and the consequences thereof. However, what I cannot get my teeth round is whether there is any proof that the vessels did not explode independently of any dockside nuclear device, so my query is whether the suggestion is that the alleged nuclear explosion caused the vessels and their munitions to explode or whether it was all arranged conveniently? As a subsidiary, why pick Port Chicago whose facilities if deliberately destroyed would cause huge logistical problems?

You might be interested to know of another, earlier, disaster in Liverpool:



S.S. Malakand, a steamer belonging to the Brocklebank line, she was berthed at the Huskisson No-2 dock with over 1000 tons of shells and bombs destined for the Middle-east.
No one Knows how, but a deflated barrage balloon slipped free of its moorings and became tangled with the ships rigging, fell onto the deck and immediately burst into flames, the crew managed to extinguish the fire, however while they were occupied with this particular fire a shower of incendiaries and high-explosive bombs had ignited some neighbouring sheds, and the flames from these soon enveloped the stricken ship. Though the crew fought valiantly to save the ship it was to no avail and the captain ordered the crew to abandon the Malakand. Desperately and with disregard for their own safety Captain Kinley and his crew along with A.F.S. personnel led by Officer John Lappin, tried to scuttle the ship and prevent a terrible explosion. Despite all their efforts a few hours after the all clear Merseyside shook with one of the greatest explosions of the entire Blitz.
The whole dock was destroyed, the Overhead Railway line was badly damaged, with some of the ships plates being blown some two and a half miles away. Though the explosion was one of the biggest during the Blitz, only four people were killed, two of the party who had tried so valiantly to scuttle the Malakand, and a newly married couple who were on their way home along the Dock road, when a huge fragment of the ship landed directly on their car killing them outright.



This is what the Huskisson Dock looked like afterwards:




Please excuse my query and thank you for putting forward your suggestion, and also to those whom have responded with very plausible counters.


reply posted on 9-1-2006 @ 02:39 PM by StellarX
Originally posted by mbkennel
(1) the US would NOT intentionally blow up its own ship, carrying vitally important ammunition, in its own shipyard, during a war!! I mean WTF? People actually took the working for victory thing seriously because it was not at all clear then the US would win.


Pearl harbour? Check out the links i just posted in previous post for more reason why this is no argument against the nuclear weapon test theory.

(2) would it somehow pack the only nuclear weapon ever in existence, made in a project so secret that few even in the military knew about its existence, into an ordinary freighter being loaded by hundreds of ordinary enlisted grunts, most of whom were black?


Black people don't know how to load ships? We really have no idea how many nuclear weapons they had at this time or a year later for that matter. All we have is what they tell us wich may even resemble the truth in some way.

(3) they barely got enough fissile material in time in mid-late 1945.


So they tell us. We are still told that diamonds are as rare as they say they are. Now the diamond thing is a rather obvious lie and yet how many people are aware of it?

(4) now known facts about the capacities and capabilities of the enrichment plants make it impossible for a weapon to be developed in 1944.


You mean to say no evidence you are aware of suggests such capabilities?

(5) the description of the nuclear weapons effects in that document? Note T-7. The "T" means theoretical division. At that time, it meant a whole lot of extremely smart people figuring out things all on their own from the laws of physics.


The laws of physics! You might be surprised to know how much those laws have changed over the last century or for that matter the last year. I do not think it's wise to try reinforce your point of view with appeals to scientific impossibility. It rarely holds up in retrospect or even in casual investigation of the subject matter at hand.

Stellar


reply posted on 9-1-2006 @ 02:40 PM by FredT
Originally posted by StellarX
I am not sure if this was really the result of a nuclear weapon test but i can assure you that the people in charge were easily capable of such atrocity.


Yes, perhaps, but again I repeat, why detonate a nuclear device so close to major industrial (shipping, ports etc) and population cneters. If Indeed this was a giant Bush / Nazi cabal (You can also throw in the Kennedy clan as well) what purpose does it serve? While its fun and easy to throw out grandiose schemes people ALWAYS have a reson for doing something like this. What purpose was served here?


Radiation poisoning ( and all the other fallout and exposure health riskes) is a rather poorly understood issue even today.


Seems pretty clear cut to me as well as groups like the CDC, OSHA et al. The simple fact remains Port Chicago is located in a major urban area. While in 1944 it may not have been as big as it was now, the site of a ground burst nuclear weapon WOULD leave fall out and background radiation that at the very least would be spread over a pretty good size area. Radiation is a causitive factor in cancer. one only has to look to the statistics compiled after the Hiroshima blasts that can be found here:

www.pcf.city.hiroshima.jp...

Now to be fair, I did come across this website that purports to have taken neasurments in the area around Port Chicago. It did notice a few areas with higher than average radiation levels, but please note that the naval shipyard there did store nuclear weapons during the cold war and Mare Island was the home to many nuclear submarines.
ian.kluft.com...





[edit on 1/9/06 by FredT]


reply posted on 9-1-2006 @ 04:11 PM by StellarX
Originally posted by FredT
Yes, perhaps, but again I repeat, why detonate a nuclear device so close to major industrial (shipping, ports etc) and population cneters. If Indeed this was a giant Bush / Nazi cabal (You can also throw in the Kennedy clan as well) what purpose does it serve? While its fun and easy to throw out grandiose schemes people ALWAYS have a reson for doing something like this. What purpose was served here?


I would have to do far more reading on this just to establish what in fact happened. What i posted was just in reference to claims that this could not be done because it would set back the war effort or that the men in charge were not capable. It is not fun and easy to talk about these things and i do not propose that i know the exact reasoning beyind planting a nuclear weapon in a harbour. As you say people do things for a reason and i would have to read more to come up with a opinion on why they might have wanted to do this.

Seems pretty clear cut to me as well as groups like the CDC, OSHA et al.


You can go look for the official UNSCEAR report but these make for better and easier reading. The original reads like all other UN( bureaucratic) reports but i can find it for you ( It's somewhere on my pc ) if your interested.

The Truth About Chernobyl Is Told

THE MYTHS OF CHERNOBYL

The UNSCEAR 2000 Report

The simple fact remains Port Chicago is located in a major urban area. While in 1944 it may not have been as big as it was now, the site of a ground burst nuclear weapon WOULD leave fall out and background radiation that at the very least would be spread over a pretty good size area.


Well just how fast does it in fact wash away due to environmental effects?


Radiation is a causitive factor in cancer. one only has to look to the statistics compiled after the Hiroshima blasts that can be found here:
www.pcf.city.hiroshima.jp...


Fortunately, the human body can repair most radiation damage if the daily radiation doses are not too large. As will be explained in Appendix B, a person who is healthy and has not been exposed in the past two weeks to a total radiation dose of more than 100 R can receive a dose of 6 R each day for at least two months without being incapacitated.


Only a very small fraction of Hiroshima and Nagasaki citizens who survived radiation doses some of which were nearly fatal have suffered serious delayed effects. The reader should realize that to do essential work after a massive nuclear attack, many survivors must be willing to receive much larger radiation doses than are normally permissible. Otherwise, too many workers would stay inside shelter too much of the time, and work that would be vital to national recovery could not be done. For example, if the great majority of truckers were so fearful of receiving even non-incapacitating radiation doses that they would refuse to transport food, additional millions would die from starvation alone.

The authoritative study by the National Academy of Sciences, A Thirty Year Study of the Survivors qf Hiroshima and Nagasaki, was published in 1977. It concludes that the incidence of abnormalities is no higher among children later conceived by parents who were exposed to radiation during the attacks on Hiroshima and Nagasaki than is the incidence of abnormalities among Japanese children born to un-exposed parents.

www.oism.org...


Dont think it may be wise to look at the site it comes from again! Does not look as objective as it could be in my opinion. No insult intended!

Now to be fair, I did come across this website that purports to have taken neasurments in the area around Port Chicago. It did notice a few areas with higher than average radiation levels, but please note that the naval shipyard there did store nuclear weapons during the cold war and Mare Island was the home to many nuclear submarines.
ian.kluft.com...


Well if your going to be policing your own mind ( as we all should) all i have to do is show you what i have found so far. I am sure you will deduce just about the same i did so enjoy the reading.

Stellar
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>    ^^TOP^^



F-22 Pilots Told Not to Talk
  Posted 18 days ago with 23 member flags
Eglin Air Force Base hangar Foam Party!
  Posted 10 days ago with 4 member flags
Space weapons / Anonymous / Afghan War plan
  Posted 3 days ago with 4 member flags
Reports of Rumbling in the Sky: Pulsejet Technology?
  Posted 13 days ago with 3 member flags