It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Lets see, 35 five miles
Originally posted by apc
there is simply no logical cause to test the first prototype on a Naval base, with an official desert test just months away.
The incredible blast wrecked the naval base and heavily damaged the small town of Port Chicago, located 1.5 miles away.
According to the declassified Oak Ridge documents, 15.5 kilograms of U-235 is needed for a gun-bomb.
The film shows a typical nuclear explosion, which would have been hard to simulate.
You take a 55-gallon drum and an M-142 and fill the drum with 105 pounds of smoke powder," he says. "The resulting chimney effect looks just like a nuclear bomb. It's better than stuff that would do real damage--it's just the looks. (source: www.metroactive.com...)
The seismic records show a very rapid detonation not characteristic of conventional explosions but the signature of atomic explosions
Study of the many published books of the Manhattan Project historical literature yields no attestation that any quantity of U235 had been separated during 1943. The author's task has been to satisfactorily confute that universally accepted precept of the Manhattan Project historical literature. Information published in this chapter will show that Philip H. Abelson, working at the United States Naval Research Laboratory with the liquid thermal diffusion uranium isotope separation method, did separate the U235 isotope during 1943 in quantity sufficient to permit the detonation of at least one Mark II bomb utilizing 9 kg U235 by 17 July 1944
The dense mass of the highly compressed cylinder walls and cylinder ends confined the active material for the brief fraction of a second necessary for the initiation of a nuclear fission chain reaction by means of a neutron source placed within the active, and thenceforth propagation of an explosive fission chain reaction.
The high explosive which encased the Mark II cylinder was itself confined by a casing of depleted uranium or lead beneath an outer cylinder of tensile steel, which collectively acted as a tamper. In total the Mark II weighed approximately 1,120 pounds (510 kg). Navy Captain William S. Parsons said the process of imploding a cylinder capable of momentarily containing an evolving fission chain reaction would be "like trying to squash a full can of beer without ejecting any of the beer." The Mark II was that theoretical can of beer. No illustration of the actual construction of the Mark II is available in the declassified literature. The Mark II was essentially a nuclear fission pipe bomb."
James Conant's 17 August 1944 report to General Groves that the Mark II could be developed for combat use in 3 or 4 months time was made specifically in consequence of the Port Chicago explosion.
Previous chapters have shown that the fireball and column of flame that did result from the Port Chicago explosion were typical of a nuclear fission explosion and could not have been generated by the explosion of the 1,750 tons TNT and torpex charge weight of munitions emplaced upon the Port Chicago Naval Magazine pier and loaded as cargo aboard the Liberty ship E. A. Bryan, which was moored to the Port Chicago Naval Magazine ship loading pier."
Originally posted by Peter Vogel
The book on the Web was written primarily for readers sophisticated in science and technology. I've now begun a re-write of the book that will be much simplified, to access a popular readership -- a "page-turner," as requested by Time Warner Books and several other trade publishers
Perhaps the re-write as a page-turner will induce assessments of the historial materials that will be based on informed analysis rather than uninformed opinion.
Originally posted by Zaphod58
Many black naval personnel complained about how bad and dangerous the conditions were for unloading the ammunition at that port. I don't see how it could have even been a SMALL nuclear blast, and people surivive it from less than 200 yards away from where it occured. I've seen and read many interviews with survivors that were on the dock less than 200 yards away from where the ship was, that were hurt badly, but survived.
Originally posted by Zaphod58
As far as the decontamination, what nuclear tests involving ships? This was 1944, less than 24 hours after the first nuclear test. The nuclear tests didn't start involving ships until AFTER the war. Someone should have noticed SOMETHING dealing with the radiation between 44 and the start of the tests involving ships, or there should have been an increase in cancer rates, or SOME evidence of increased radiation.
Originally posted by rogue1
Study of the many published books of the Manhattan Project historical literature yields no attestation that any quantity of U235 had been separated during 1943. The author's task has been to satisfactorily confute that universally accepted precept of the Manhattan Project historical literature. Information published in this chapter will show that Philip H. Abelson, working at the United States Naval Research Laboratory with the liquid thermal diffusion uranium isotope separation method, did separate the U235 isotope during 1943 in quantity sufficient to permit the detonation of at least one Mark II bomb utilizing 9 kg U235 by 17 July 1944
www.portchicago.org...