It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Our earliest ancestors gave up hunter-gathering and took to a settled life up to 400,000 years earlier than previously thought, according to controversial research.
The accepted timescale of Man’s evolution is being challenged by a German archaeologist who claims to have found evidence that Homo erectus — mankind’s early ancestor, who migrated from Africa to Asia and Europe — began living in settled communities long before the accepted time of 10,000 years ago.
The point at which settlement actually took place is the first critical stage in humanity’s cultural development.
Helmut Ziegert, of the Institute of Archaeology at Hamburg University, says that the evidence can be found at excavated sites in North and East Africa, in the remains of stone huts and tools created by upright man for fishing and butchery.
Professor Ziegert claims that the thousands of blades, scrapers, hand axes and other tools found at sites such as Budrinna, on the shore of the extinct Lake Fezzan in southwest Libya, and at Melka Konture, along the River Awash in Ethiopia, provide evidence of organised societies.
He believes that such sites show small communities of 40 or 50 people, with abundant water resources to exploit for constant harvests.
The implications for our knowledge of human evolution — and of our intellectual and social beginnings — are “profound” and a “staggering shift”, he said.
Professor Ziegert used potassium argon isotopic dating, stratigraphy and tool typology to compile his evidence. He will publish his findings this month in Minerva, the archaeology journal
Originally posted by Marduk
ah but its not so controversial
its an established fact that Homo Erectus was around from approximately 2 million to around 400,000 years ago.
there is evidence of one specimen from 1,700,000 years ago who lived into old age with only one tooth proving cooperative behaviour
500,000 years ago in china there is evidence that Homo Erectus understood the properties of charcoal which it utilised to control fire
for the vast majority of their existence they were unchanged and had a brain size ranging from 900 to 1200 cc (homo sapiens average 1400 cc)
Homo Erectus used many tools such as hand axes, picks, cleavers and scrapers which it manufactured itself by flint knapping
so its not so astounding
its a bit odd imo to think that they were around unchanged for 2 million years and only figured out how to work together fairly recently before they became extinct
so far as statistics go they are the most succesful Homo species that ever existed
compare their 2 million years with our 150,000
Originally posted by uberarcanist
Hmmm...maybe you'll start being open minded about OOP artifacts and fantastic lost civilizations such as Atlantis then?
Originally posted by Marduk
ah but its not so controversial
...
Homo Erectus used many tools such as hand axes, picks, cleavers and scrapers which it manufactured itself by flint knapping
so its not so astounding
its a bit odd imo to think that they were around unchanged for 2 million years and only figured out how to work together fairly recently before they became extinct
so far as statistics go they are the most succesful Homo species that ever existed
compare their 2 million years with our 150,000
Originally posted by Marduk
homo erectus was not involved with Atlantis
the Bronze age began around 3600bce in the fertile crescent and Atlantis is described as a Bronze age civilisation by Plato in 9600bce and is not known from any other credible source.
Athens features highly in the story and it didn't exist until 1500BCE at the very earliest
Atalntis is named after a Greek God who of course didn't exist until the Greek civilisation which has its earliest roots around 2000bce
you understand I'm sure that Plato was a Philosopher
you understand what Philosophers do right ?
they tell moral stories to teach people how to behave
theres being open minded and theres letting your brain fall out
Originally posted by Arcane Demesne
400,000 you say?
Cue the Zitchinites !!!
Seriously though. Does this guy have any more data that he relied on, or was it just something he'd take a wild chance on, in hopes of being right? It seems none of the other scientists agree with him.
Originally posted by Byrd
... erectus had known "factory sites" where groups would sit down and process out stone cores to make weapons and tools. There's some evidence of use of fire, too, so a village wouldn't be too far beyond the pale.
Originally posted by Arcane Demesne
Originally posted by Byrd
... erectus had known "factory sites" where groups would sit down and process out stone cores to make weapons and tools. There's some evidence of use of fire, too, so a village wouldn't be too far beyond the pale.
They actually sat down together to make tools in a uniform fashion? That's really neat. I never really gave Homo Erectus that much credit (aside from fire). I guess I need to look deeper into our very distant ancestry. Thanks for the fun fact Byrd.
Originally posted by uberarcanist
You had better start giving them credit! As far as we can tell, they were the first to harness fire and they also crossed 80 miles of open seas (the Torres Strait) to get to Australia!
Originally posted by Arcane Demesne
Erectus made it to Australia?! Criminy, I need to brush up on my Archeology!
So wait a minute.
that almost brings up that question of...Did we evolve from one clan of Homo Erectus, or did different clans of Homo Erectus evolve separately, but into the same species we are now? I'm officially confused again.
Originally posted by Byrd
A good question. The answer is "from one group of homo erectus." If we'd evolved from separate clans, each race would be very genetically different from the other. For instance, tigers evolved all over Asia, and the different groups are just different enough (genetically) that they're listed as separate subspecies.
Originally posted by TheWalkingFox
There wouldn't have been a lot of drive to work your butt off to build a home or grow crops, if it was just as easy to lay down where you were or reach over and grab some handy fruit.
Originally posted by Arcane Demesne
If the traveling Erectuses were smarter, why did they not survive?