It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ShiftTrio
Been looking for verified documents from companies that have a similar look and feel as well from the 80s. But the font history is a great idea. The issue is there are SO many sub sets of original fonts may be hard to nail down. But I will put my effort into it.
Originally posted by SkepticOverlordIt is highly improbably to have a mixture of fonts and italics on a page using typical office document preparation software and printers of 1986.
Originally posted by RandomThought
Here's an example of how good CGI is now days
Looks real don't it?
Originally posted by wildone106
Poor? Show me better examples then..
And the objects depicted in the photo are very CGI, if you work with it you can just tell the feel of the rendering technique.
Originally posted by corda
What I would say though, is that the examples of 'photorealistic' CGI are poor comparisons at best. The pictures of the cars and vehicles are very, very easily spottable as CGI. Whilst there are certain elements of the CARET photos that point towards CGI (some of the shadows and texturing have some CGI characteristics) I don't think it's possible to say one way or another."
By the time you get to the fourth, fifth and sixth words, the problem has spiraled out of control. Now imagine trying to add the billionth word to the list (imagine also that we're working with an infinite alphabet so you don't run out of letters) and you can imagine how difficult it is for even a computer to keep up. Needless to say, writing this kind of thing "by hand" is orders of magnitude beyond the capabilities of the brain.
Originally posted by TheExaminer
The government will watch us squabble and sit back and laugh just like GR just did.
They have been successful in their plan to place doubt about any and all evidence presented on this site.
Originally posted by RandomThought
Here's an example of how good CGI is now days
Originally posted by ShiftTrio
Ok this should put this to rest about the dates,
Orginal Macs had the font Palatino, as did the the Apple Laser Writer in 1985, one of only 10 fonts to use on the printer. Read the link. The Mac was fully capable of creating and printing this document in 1985
www.printerworks.net...
Edit, oh guess where the macs were invented at the time, any one,, Pala Alto Ca lol
[edit on 27-6-2007 by ShiftTrio]
Originally posted by Now_Then
Trying to wrap my head round this infinite alphabet , whats the verdict on that? Way to describe a vastly more complicated alphabet? Or literally an infinite alphabet? How would an infinite alphabet be possible, for an alphabet to work each symbol has to have meaning, you can’t go on adding symbols for ever - it would be nonsense.
Or is my mind too small?
Originally posted by RandomThought
Here's an example of how good CGI is now days
Looks real don't it?
Originally posted by Now_Then
I haven't had time to read much past the first and last page of this thread (15 pages in 22 hours, I missed getting in on this one from the first floor)
Read the link given by the OP, in fact continuing to re-read, really good stuff, not perfectly written, in my head that sort of adds a bit.
I've seen lots of posts saying genuine, lots saying hoax. Up to this point I have read none saying this is PART of the general hoax. The entire thing is very well done from start to this point - got us lot going! (Although admittedly this is what we are here for). Could the author of the link be in from the start? From the level of detail on that site I would not (necessarily) say he/she is a tag along.
By the time you get to the fourth, fifth and sixth words, the problem has spiraled out of control. Now imagine trying to add the billionth word to the list (imagine also that we're working with an infinite alphabet so you don't run out of letters) and you can imagine how difficult it is for even a computer to keep up. Needless to say, writing this kind of thing "by hand" is orders of magnitude beyond the capabilities of the brain.
Trying to wrap my head round this infinite alphabet , whats the verdict on that? Way to describe a vastly more complicated alphabet? Or literally an infinite alphabet? How would an infinite alphabet be possible, for an alphabet to work each symbol has to have meaning, you can’t go on adding symbols for ever - it would be nonsense.
Or is my mind too small?
Originally posted by LoDGiKaL
I was just playing around with the documents in photoshop and discovered there's something which looks like a watermark in the paper.
Here, take a look. I uploaded two enhanced pictures to photobucket.
Anyone know what this could mean/stand for?
Originally posted by ExquisitExamplE
Originally posted by j_kalin
I vote hoax. Anyone who worked on this project for as long as Isaac claims would have a lot of technical knowledge, If he really wanted to disclose this technology, he would have relayed some technical data, ie equations, etc that explain the principles behind "antigravity." Instead, he rambles on for pages and pages about his motives, his employment history, etc, but never providing any useful information. It's just someone's idea of fiction. Nice pics of who-knows-what.
How can you know if they even had equations. He said himself that not only did they really have no idea where to begin with these "artifacts", The military brass wouldn't supply them with all the data they needed to make good progress.
And it seems to me that he did provide "equations" in the form of the linguistic primer. If these symbols were the medium with which they were working, would it not make sense to describe their application in the same context?
Originally posted by LoDGiKaL
I was just playing around with the documents in photoshop and discovered there's something which looks like a watermark in the paper.
Here, take a look. I uploaded two enhanced pictures to photobucket.