It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ShatteredSkies
MiG-31 being a serious threat? Sure it's fast, but is burning out it's fuel reserves in less than 5 minutes really the best tactic for an endurance battle?
They better hope that they get one shot and their one shot doesn't miss because if they have to come over again they'll be out of fuel before they know it.
Shattered OUT...
I was reading a book that had pilot interviews from the KAL 007 incident. Those who remember it may recall that in the days following the US sent a squadron of F-15s from Alaska along with an E-3 to either Japan or SK don't recall which, and were told in not so many words to be aggressive and if the opportunity presented itself, to make an example. Fortunately cooler heads higher up found out and immediately put the brakes on THAT attitude but in the meantime the USSR sent some Mig-31s into the area as a counter. In the words of one of those Eagle pilots "the Mig-31s made the run down (about 600 miles IIRC) at Mach 2.6". Mach 2.6 for 600 miles is nothing to dismiss whether they used afterburners or not. This isn't meant to start a pissing contest of "who would have won the Migs or the Eagles" but just to point out that if you've got the gas and you don't need to manuever then what does it matter?
Originally posted by FredT
The phased array in the Mig 31 while powerfull may be able to pick up the Raptor within the kill range of a AIM-120C which is 65 miles...
Originally posted by WestPoint23
Originally posted by FredT
The phased array in the Mig 31 while powerfull may be able to pick up the Raptor within the kill range of a AIM-120C which is 65 miles...
I think you are seriously underestimating the stealth capabilities of the F-22 Raptor. I would be surprised if even a NATO AWACS could detect the F-22 at that distance, maybe an AEGIS (ship borne radar) but not anything else.
The AWACS would see the Mig-31 as soon as it takes off directing escorting fighters to vector. Given that the F-22 will not be detected by the Mig-31 (therefore the Mig does not know to change vector to avoid interception) it can get into a good position to attack (the F-22 isn't slow either). As for escaping an AMRAAM, it has to know one is in the air and from what vector to be able to outrun it. No doubt against such a target the missiles NEZ will be lower but if the Mig-31 is inside the AIM-120D's NEZ then no matter what it does it will be shot down.
Originally posted by The Winged Wombat
Honestly, the things the propaganda of invincibility will make people say!
Originally posted by The Winged Wombat
The whole point is that the use of the MiG-31 increases the commitment required to protect the AWACS.
Originally posted by The Winged Wombat
The MiG-31 is not interested in killing Raptors, it wants to kill the AWACS - the onus is on the Raptors to prevent the MiG-31 getting a shot (and the MiG-31 has a top speed almost 1.5 times that of the F-22 - good luck on the intercept.)
Originally posted by The Winged Wombat
Welcome to the real world, folks.
Originally posted by northwolf
Could the threath caused by Mig-31 attempting to close in on AWACS be enough to draw F-22s into the engagement envelope of the S-300 Batteries...
Bergeson noted that "very few, if any" Red Air survived the F-22-led Blue force attack.
The F-22s went against ground threats simulating real-world air defenses, including communications jamming, networked surface-to-air missiles, and anti-aircraft artillery. The Aggressors attempted to lure the F-22s into "SAM-bushes," trying to get the Raptors to pursue them into areas densely defended by surface weapons.
Source (Page 18) PDF
Originally posted by Harlequin
westpoint is a `patriot` and thus believes the invincibility of the US warmachine - ...is of no importance as that was 16 year ago and thus must be out of date technology...
Originally posted by WestPoint23
I think you are seriously underestimating the stealth capabilities of the F-22 Raptor. I would be surprised if even a NATO AWACS could detect the F-22 at that distance, maybe an AEGIS (ship borne radar) but not anything else.
Several developments of the MiG-31 have been produced. The MiG-31M is an improved version of the original MiG-31 with a new radar and is capable of carrying the advanced R-37 and R-77 missiles. The cockpit has been redesigned and now features 3 multi-functional displays. The MiG-31M also has larger fuel tanks, upgraded engines and more refined aerodynamics. The MiG-31D version was designed to carry an ASAT (anti-satellite) missile. The MiG-31B was an improved version of the original with a better computer and in-flight refueling and also a new radar. The MiG-31BM is a variant with some ground attack capability. The MiG-31FE was a multi-purpose version capable of carrying most Russian air-to-ground weapons.
Originally posted by kilcoo316
Has it not been established that the F-22 is good for evading fire-control radar, but not long wave search radar.
Originally posted by kilcoo316
You continually overestimate the effectiveness of the stealth technology on the F-22.
Originally posted by kilcoo316
Its RCS is brilliant from certain azmuthal angles (which gives you the quoted -40 odd dB), and good from others - doesn't make it undetectable, far from it.
Originally posted by kilcoo316
A squadron of MiG-31s would be able to cause some serious headaches for a carrier group limited to F/A-18s (be they legacy or 'super' hornets).
Originally posted by WestPoint23
Anyway, despite our different views on the Super Hornet why would the USN not be able to use it's impressive radar and missile systems in this scenario?
Originally posted by WestPoint23
Established? No. Hinted at, yes.
Originally posted by WestPoint23
I only go by that real world results have indicated. Even when the OPFOR has been given an AWACS they still could not detect the F-22 at useful ranges.
Originally posted by WestPoint23
It has all-round stealth (RCS reduction), more and less from certain angles, of course. As for being undetected, hopefully you don't take me for that much of an imbecilic.
Originally posted by WestPoint23[
Anyway, even if the F-22 is not optimized for long wave radar it does not mean the range at which it will be detected by those radars will be the same as a conventional fighter. As far as the scenario above goes, being optimized for high frequency is not a handicap.
Originally posted by WestPoint23
Originally posted by The Winged Wombat
Honestly, the things the propaganda of invincibility will make people say!
Figuring it out and developing systems to counter it are two different things, how many western AWACS have been shot down in operational history? Even while operating with hostile Mig-25's in the vicinity. By the way, since when did Russian enter this discussion.
......
Originally posted by FredT
The phased array in the Mig 31 while powerfull may be able to pick up the Raptor within the kill range of a AIM-120C which is 65 miles but the D varient has a projected range of at least 100 miles.