It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by intrepid
"......... with fava beans and a nice Chianti."
Not even to survive man. I hear people taste like Soylent Green and that's not chicken.
Originally posted by intrepid
I have to admit this is a pretty damn sick thread. Would you eat a person? Would you eat a loved one? Would you let your loved ones to eat you?
I think if you consider going to these extremes, you're no longer human. I don't care that canibalism has been practiced in the past, KEY WORD "past", eating a fellow human is just wrong. Once you go there imo you cease being human.
Why is YOUR life so damn important that you would cross a line that most wouldn't? Or is it just a role playing thing? How far would you go to survive?
What's on the menu btw?
Fillet of father?
Mutton of mother?
Steak of stranger?
Sirloin of son?
Sick # imo. I'd rather starve. NO ONE is that damn important.
Originally posted by earth2
I think if your little boy was starving you might reconsider eating the dead pilots ham.
It is sick I agree but starvation would definitly change your morals. I would do anything for my 2 kids. I would kill myself before I would kill another person though.
Originally posted by earth2
What is so humane about being dead?
Sorry mate, I disagree. I'd rather have my family die with the dignity of a Camp victim than survive as a Hannibal. Humanity means something imo.
ide rather die quickly of starvation
Originally posted by intrepid
"Humane" is a good word, do you know the root word? "Human." I don't recall in any of the reading that I have done that eating fellow "humans" was acceptable. I recall it in Stephen King's work though. You know what he mostly writes? HORROR.
I would shudder to think that "human"ity would have sunk to this level. If it has, we're all doomed.